View clinical trials related to Chronotropic Incompetence.
Filter by:This is a prospective study, blinded for the evaluator, randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive standard management alone or combined with a program of training (aerobic alone or combined with strength exercises) that will be carried out in a single centre. After randomization, patients will be clinically evaluated. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, functional class NYHA II-III, and chronotropic incompetence criteria will be enrolled. A sample size estimation [alfa: 0.05, power: 80%, a 15% loss rate, and at least a delta change of mean peakVO2: +2,4 mL/kg/min (SD±2)] of 80 patients (20 per arm) would be necessary to test our hypothesis.
Implantation with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) leads to improvements in survival and quality of life, however, work capacity remains disappointingly low, at half of the expected value. Complex central and peripheral hallmarks of heart failure attribute to the continued work intolerance, to which heart rate may be a contributing factor. The purpose of this study is to clarify the impact of heart rate (by means of pacing) on work capacity (measured as peak oxygen uptake) in LVAD recipients.
The ADAPTION trial is an investigator initiated prospective randomized doubleblind cross-over pilot study in a multi-center setting. Aim: to assess the ability of minute ventilation (MV) sensor driven rate adaptive atrial stimulation to restore functional capacity and quality of life in heart failure patients with chronotropic incompetence. Methods: heart failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% & New York Heart Assessment II or III) who were implanted with a 2-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) device equipped with a MV sensor that are diagnosed with chronotropic incompetence will be included in the study. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to rate responsive pacing (MV sensor only) function ON (AAIR mode) or OFF (DDI mode). After 3 months the pacing mode will be switched to the opposite mode.
Some patients' heart rates do not increase as needed during activities and exercise, which can make them feel tired and fatigued easily. The patients in this study have a pacemaker with a FDA approved rate response sensor, which senses activity level by sensing motion (through a component known as an accelerometer) and/or breathing changes (known as minute ventilation). These changes in motion or breathing make the pacemaker increase the patient's heart rate. This study is being conducted to see which rate response sensor is better (motion driven or breathing driven). The study is also investigating whether optimizing the sensor based on the individual patient will give better results in terms of increasing the patient's exercise capacity. The hypothesis is that rate responsive pacing driven by the minute ventilation sensor results in improved functional capacity compared to accelerometer in chronotropically incompetent patients.