View clinical trials related to Chronic Lower Back Pain.
Filter by:After spinal fusion and decompression surgery there is a possible risk of developing chronic back pain. After surgery there is typically inflammation around the operation site and this inflammation can be painful and debilitating to patients. Many possible treatment plans have been incorporated to assist the patient with recovery - notably medications, physical therapy, and braces. However, few studies have looked at laser diodes that utilize high-power laser lights that are aimed at decreasing pain and inflammation. Investigators aim to look compare patients using a back brace with laser diodes within versus those who wear a normal brace used as a placebo. Investigators will also assess the patient's surgical wound to monitor the progression of wound healing while using the brace.
To study the prevalence of sarcopenia in a pre-retirement group with chronic lower back pain and factors associated between sarcopenia and chronic lower back pain in the pre-retirement group.
This research is studying whether changing an individual's behaviors may have an impact as a treatment or outcome for chronic low back pain. This research will try to understand how much an electronic, self-management website like PainGuide can help participants. The study hypothesizes that tailored digital interventions (plus using PainGuide) will demonstrate greater improvement in pain interference.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and the efficacy of an hydrogel (double cross-link microgel - DXM) injection into the intervertebral disc (IVD) space in patients with painful lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) over 24 to 48 weeks.
Randomized, 2-arm parallel group clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a self-administered Virtual Reality program for the treatment of chronic lower back pain compared to a placebo VR program.
This study will test the effectiveness of an evidence-based virtual reality therapy program as a non-pharmacological supplement to managing patients with pain due to chronic lower back pain. Outpatients will be randomized to receive one of three virtual reality (VR) programs: skills-based VR, distraction VR, or sham VR. All patients will receive a VR headset and Fitbit Charge 4 watch. Study devices will be delivered to the patient's home with instructions for use via FedEx; patients will receive remote technical support. Patients will be followed for 90 days and monitored for functional status, pain levels, use of pain medications (including opioids). Participants will also be asked to consent/authorization to access medical records from their treating facility.
Effective control of chronic pain is a top priority in the United States, as approximately 10% of adults have severe chronic pain most of which is chronic lower back pain (CLBP). However, despite the advances in neuroscience over the past 20 years, chronic pain is largely treated with opiate narcotics, much as was done in the Civil War. In addition to their high abuse liability and dependence potential, only 30 40% of chronic pain patients declare they receive satisfactory (>50%) relief from their pain through pharmacological treatment. In these patients a common clinical practice is to escalate the dose of opiates as tolerance develops which unfortunately has contributed to escalation in opiate overdose deaths, a resurgence of intravenous heroin use, and $55 billion in societal costs. Consequently, there is a critical need for new treatments that can treat pain and reduce reliance on opiates in individuals with chronic pain. The proposed study will be the first to employ a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design to parametrically evaluate the longitudinal effects of 16 days of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the primary motor cortex (MC) or the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) on self-reported pain and the brain s response to pain. This will be done in a cohort of patients recruited from the community as well as Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH) clinics with chronic lower back pain that have not been able to find adequate pain relief, whether or not they are using prescription opiates for 3 or more months. Participants will be randomized to receive rTMS to the MC, MPFC, or sham (50% at each site), using a Latin square randomization. Resting state connectivity will be collected 3 times: before the 1st day of TMS, after the 12th day of TMS, and before the 16th day of TMS (the last day administered).
Mechanical diagnosis and treatment (MDT) and Manual Therapy (MT) have both demonstrated efficacy in the management of CLBP. The use of a Point of Care (POC) design in this study will allow for comparison of these two treatment modalities in a clinical setting. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting, enrolling and collecting outcome data on CLBP patients utilizing the POC methodology.
This is a Phase III, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with an enriched-enrollment withdrawal (EEW) design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAM2038 in opioid-experienced subjects with moderate to severe CLBP that requires continuous, around-the-clock (ATC) opioid treatment ≥ 40 mg morphine equivalent dose (MED). The study includes 5 phases: A Screening Phase (up to 2 weeks), a Transition Phase (up to 2 weeks), an Open-Label Titration Phase (up to 10 weeks), a Double-Blind Treatment Phase including a Final Study Visit (12 weeks), and a Follow-up Phase (4 weeks). The overall duration of participation in the core phase of the study (randomized Double-Blind Phase) is up to 30 weeks, from the Screening Phase through the Follow-up Phase. Subjects who complete the Double-Blind Treatment Study Phase will be offered an opportunity to continue treatment in an open label safety extension for up to 60 weeks. Additional subjects may be recruited to open label safety extension to meet the goal of 100 subjects with 60 weeks of treatment.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ASP7962 relative to placebo. This study will also evaluate the efficacy of ASP7962 relative to placebo on pain on walking, function and stiffness; the time course of efficacy of ASP7962 relative to placebo; the improvement in overall patient status of ASP7962 relative to placebo as well as the safety and tolerability of ASP7962 relative to placebo.