View clinical trials related to Chronic Headache.
Filter by:Therapeutic exercise, including aerobic activity and strength training, has shown promise in treating primary headaches with a moderate effect size, despite limited evidence. Implementation requires specialized professionals, infrastructure, and defined care pathways. These strategies are cost-effective for similar chronic pain conditions. More research is needed to better understand the varying effects on headache frequency, duration, and intensity in larger patient samples.
The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and feasibility of coiling the lumbar vein for the treatment of chronic headaches in patients with Nutcracker physiology and retrograde lumbar vein flow with epidural venous plexus congestion. All patients are extensively evaluated by a headache trained Neurologist confirming high pressure headache refractory to other treatments.
The prevalence of chronic primary headache in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is 54.4%. Several studies have shown that the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at the primary motor cortex (M1), primary sensory cortex (S1), or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is effective as adjuvant therapy in primary headache. Using a double-blind design, this clinical trial study will investigate the effectiveness of tDCS as an adjuvant therapy in chronic daily headaches in SLE, by also comparing the effectiveness of administration in the M1, S1, and DLPFC. The primary endpoint that will be assessed is the frequency of headaches per week, with the secondary endpoints are the degree of headache, quality of life, sleep quality, level of depression, and use of analgesics.
Children's chronic pain is a significant condition that affects roughly 25% of children, with approximately 3% of them requiring intense pain therapy. In the adult literature, various scales have been established to assess fear of pain. When these scales are studied, fear of pain has been shown to have a role in adult chronic pain research, but this topic has gotten less attention in pediatric chronic pain research. The Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children (FOPQ-C) is a questionnaire that addresses this knowledge gap. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity and clinical utility of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children (FOPQ-C) Scale in the Turkish community.
The investigators plan to evaluate long-term consequences of unintentional dural puncture in women who had this complication during labor epidural insertion at Mount Sinai Hospital. A dural puncture is the perforation of the dura mater (one of the layers protecting the brain and the spinal cord) by the needle that is used to find and place a catheter in the epidural space. A puncture will cause a leakage of cerebrospinal fluid through the dura that results in an acute and usually self-limited headache in half of patients who have this complication. The usual treatment for this complication is conservative with the use of oral medications like acetaminophen, anti-inflammatory and narcotics. In the severely symptomatic patient, the injection of blood in the epidural space is a more invasive approach performed to "patch" the hole that was created in the dura (epidural blood patch). The objective is to determine whether or not there is a risk of developing long-term effects from the unintentional dural puncture and its treatment by epidural blood patch by comparing women who had a dural puncture during their labour epidural insertion with or without an epidural blood patch with women who received an epidural but did not have a dural puncture during the same period of time. The hypothesis is that women who had unintentional dural punctures during epidural insertion will develop long-term effects such as chronic headache, chronic backache, chronic auditory or visual disturbances and chronic disability more frequently than women who received an epidural but did not sustain a dural puncture. The investigators also hypothesize that the use of epidural blood patch may change the course of these complications.
This study will evaluate neurofeedback (NFB) training as a low risk, non-invasive, effective treatment for Veterans diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and experiencing chronic post-concussive symptoms (PCSs). It is being funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Doing this study will help to determine if NFB will reduce chronic headaches and enhance sleep, attention and quality of life in Veterans with mTBI. NFB is like other biofeedback processes in which information about a person's specific body functioning is made known to the person through a special computer program, which can help that person make the specific body function work better through training. This type of training is usually fun and easy with the help of a coach and a computer. Nothing is ever put into a person's body with biofeedback and it is natural and safe. When a person becomes focused, calm and alert while training on an NFB system, the computer will recognize this and let the trainee know by automatically displaying on the computer screen the positive progression of the game they are playing, such as the plane moving forward or a flower opening. The brain really likes to be in this pattern and when it is happening, people feel good. As a result, any discomforts, like headaches or insomnia, experienced may decrease. After learning about the study, Veterans who agree to participate will be randomly placed into one of two groups, either an intervention group (who will receive NFB) or a control group (who will receive only usual care plus once a week 15-minute calls on health topics). Veterans will have an equal chance of being in either group. Those placed in the control, will also receive NFB after completion of the control group activities. Veterans who are placed in the intervention or delayed intervention group will receive NFB up to 5 times a week, but usually 3 times a week for a total of 20 sessions. Each session is an hour long. Both the intervention and control group will participate in four assessment sessions (lasting up to 2 1/2 hours each) that involve completing 12 questionnaires and a 20-minute attention evaluation. The assessment sessions will occur at the beginning of the study, at 4-6 weeks, at 8-10 weeks, and 2-months later. The participant will receive financial compensation for taking the baseline assessment, 4-6 week, 8-10-week assessments, and for the 2-month follow-up assessment. A participant will receive financial compensation for gas, time and valet parking for each intervention and assessment session. Participation in this research will last about 4 months for those in the intervention and 8 months for those in the delayed intervention group. All participants will receive the NFB treatment by the end of the study. A person who participates in this study may experience a reduction in his or her chronic headaches, and an enhancement of sleep, attention and quality of life. There may be a worsening of symptoms until the individualized training plan for a person can be identified. During an NFB session, brief moments, lasting only seconds or minutes, of dizziness while sitting, muscle tension, or tingling may be experienced. Most people feel relaxed and calm during and after NFB training. This project will be an important step towards a broader implementation of an evidence-based treatment solution for Veterans experiencing chronic headaches, insomnia and attention disorders. The experience of these chronic symptoms can lead to debilitation in all areas of Veterans' lives. This project will provide evidence for the use of NFB with Veterans to alleviate their chronic symptoms and enhance their quality of life. If supported, NFB will offer the investigators' Veterans an effective and non-invasive treatment option. NFB is a patient focused intervention that enables Veterans the opportunity for self-health management.
Chronic headache is among the most common neurological disorders with major physical, psychological, social and economic impact. The aim of this prospective observational study isto investigate the effects of an interdisciplinary multimodal integrated care program in patients with chronic migraine and/or tension-type headache. 158 patients with chronic migraine or tensions-type headache at least five days per month for at least 6 months and current intake of triptans (migraine) or analgesic drugs (tension-type headache) are eligible. Patients undergo inpatient, outpatient and/or semi-stationary treatment including conventional headache diagnostics and therapy as well as traditional Chinese medicine, European naturopathy, and mind-body-medicine approaches. Headache frequency is defined as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes include pain (visual analog scale, Pain Perception Scale), triptans and analgesics use (headache diary), health-related quality of life (SF-36), function (Headache Disability Inventory, Patient-specific Functional Scale), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and pain self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Outcomes are assessed at treatment start, treatment end and 6 months after treatment end.
Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) causes significant short-term disability, prevents mobilisation, affects childcare activities and results in prolonged hospital stay. Initial treatment involves painkillers and if patient fails to respond, an Epidural Blood Patch (EBP). EBP involves taking patient's blood and injecting into the epidural space. It is generally agreed that PDPH is a self-limiting condition and resolves in two weeks. However there is emerging evidence that patients with PDPH could be at an increased risk of developing longstanding (chronic) headaches. Retrospective case studies show that between 28 - 34% of patients who developed PDPH had longstanding headaches at 18 months after the insertion of the epidural. There is also recent evidence of new onset low back pain developing in patients who have received an epidural blood patch that was performed to treat PDPH. Nearly two thirds of patients from a hospital in UK had new onset low back pain after they had received epidural blood patch treatment. Presently, there is no prospective clinical study evaluating the development of longstanding headaches and new onset low back pain after the development of PDPH. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of longstanding headache after accidental dural (ADP) puncture and the incidence of new onset low back pain after epidural blood patch treatment.
This study aims to evaluate whether direct access from General Practitioners (GPs) to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for patients with chronic headache decreases overall NHS costs and increases patient satisfaction compared to clinical practice with referral to Neurology Services.
The primary aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation treatment versus placebo treatment in children suffering from headache for more than six months.