View clinical trials related to Chronic Cough.
Filter by:Diabetic patients with and without chronic cough will be included in this study. After giving their informed consent, the patients will perform a spirometry, chest X-ray at the inclusion visit. Cough will be assessed using the cough visual analog scale (VAS) and the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Within 60 days, the patient will perform neurophysiological tests. The neurophysiological assessment will be concluded with a skin biopsy to evaluate small fiber neuropathy. The aim of the study is to compare the proportion of small fiber neuropathy between diabetic patients with chronic cough and those without chronic cough.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of two doses of gefapixant (MK-7264) in Japanese adult participants with refractory or unexplained chronic cough.
Comparison of citric acid and mannitol cough provocation tests among subjects with chronic cough and healthy volunteers.
This is a randomized, cross-over, single-blind trial. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either capsaicin or adenosine triphosphate (ATP) cough provocation test, followed by a washout period of 2 to 14 days. Participants will be crossed-over to undergo another cough provocation test. Patient would be under observation in the out-patient clinics for ~2 hours following the cough provocation tests in case of severe adverse events.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose escalation study of bradanicline in subjects with chronic cough
This estimation study (no hypotheses) will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of gefapixant (MK-7264) in Japanese adult participants with unexplained or refractory chronic cough.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of gefapixant (MK-7264) in reducing cough frequency as measured over a 24-hour period, and to determine the safety and tolerability of gefapixant. The primary hypothesis is that at least one dose of gefapixant is superior to placebo in reducing coughs per hour (over 24 hours) at Week 24.
The main objectives of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy of gefapixant in reducing cough frequency as measured over a 24-hour period at Week 12, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of gefapixant. The primary hypothesis is that at least one gefapixant dose is superior to placebo in reducing coughs per hour (over 24 hours) at Week 12.
Chronic cough is an important clinical problem in primary care and sub-specialty practice. Besides the distress experienced by patients with chronic cough, significant healthcare resources are expended to understand the role of gastroesophageal reflux, asthma and post-nasal drip in understanding their contribution to cough. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in patients with chronic cough. More importantly, treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has led to improvement in cough for chronic cough patients. Mechanisms by which OSA therapy with CPAP can improve cough includes beneficial effects on reflux and airway inflammation. The aim of this study is to definitively establish that CPAP therapy for treatment of OSA in chronic cough patients improves cough. While these patients with chronic cough are not routinely screened and treated for OSA, this study aims to evaluate these chronic cough patients with screening questionnaires for OSA and if necessary with polysomnography and randomize them to either CPAP or sham CPAP for 6 weeks.
We have noticed a group of patients presenting with a longstanding wet cough which has often been treated as asthma. The cough is productive of sputum which frequently contains bacteria, but does not resolve with standard antibiotic treatment. A very similar cough is seen in subjects who smoke, have exposure to airbourne dusts or chemicals or have a condition known as bronchiectasis, but these problems have already been excluded. We have found that prolonged treatment with an antibiotic called azithromycin is very effective but using azithromycin in this way is not licensed and there is currently no trial evidence to support its use. This research will evaluate the clinical benefit of low dose azithromycin to determine if this is an effective and safe treatment for these patients. It will also involve a detailed investigation of these patients to determine whether they have enough in common to believe we are describing a new condition.