Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) |
It is a test developed by Spielberger et al. that measures state and trait anxiety levels. Its validity and reliability in Turkey was done by Oner and Le Compte. The scale consists of two parts, the 'state anxiety scale', which is created with the aim of determining the instantaneous feelings, and the 20-item 'trait anxiety scale', which was created to determine the feelings in general. It is a four degree scale ranging from 'Nothing' to 'All'. Scores range from 20 (low anxiety) to 80 (high anxiety). |
1 day before surgery |
|
Primary |
The State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) |
It is a test developed by Spielberger et al. that measures state and trait anxiety levels. Its validity and reliability in Turkey was done by Oner and Le Compte. The scale consists of two parts, the 'state anxiety scale', which is created with the aim of determining the instantaneous feelings. It is a four degree scale ranging from 'Nothing' to 'All'. Scores range from 20 (low anxiety) to 80 (high anxiety). |
On the 1 day of surgery |
|
Primary |
The State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) |
It is a test developed by Spielberger et al. that measures state and trait anxiety levels. Its validity and reliability in Turkey was done by Oner and Le Compte. The scale consists of two parts, the 'state anxiety scale', which is created with the aim of determining the instantaneous feelings. It is a four degree scale ranging from 'Nothing' to 'All'. Scores range from 20 (low anxiety) to 80 (high anxiety). |
1st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
The State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) |
It is a test developed by Spielberger et al. that measures state and trait anxiety levels. Its validity and reliability in Turkey was done by Oner and Le Compte. The scale consists of two parts, the 'state anxiety scale', which is created with the aim of determining the instantaneous feelings. It is a four degree scale ranging from 'Nothing' to 'All'. Scores range from 20 (low anxiety) to 80 (high anxiety). |
15st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
The State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) |
It is a test developed by Spielberger et al. that measures state and trait anxiety levels. Its validity and reliability in Turkey was done by Oner and Le Compte. The scale consists of two parts, the 'state anxiety scale', which is created with the aim of determining the instantaneous feelings. It is a four degree scale ranging from 'Nothing' to 'All'. Scores range from 20 (low anxiety) to 80 (high anxiety). |
30st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
Visual Analog Sleep Scale (VASS) |
The VASS was developed by Verran and Snyder-Halpern in 1988 to evaluate the sleep quality of patients and healthy individuals. The Turkish validity reliability studywas performed by Çetinkaya and Karabulut in 2016. The Turkish form of the scale was created from 10 items without sub-dimensions and some items were removed, unlike the original. Each item in the scale is evaluated using the visual comparison technique on a chart from 0(at the left end) to 100 (at the right end). The Turkish form of thescale produces a score between 0 and 1000 under the title of sleepquality. The increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates that the quality of sleep decreases. |
1 day before surgery |
|
Primary |
Visual Analog Sleep Scale (VASS) |
The VASS was developed by Verran and Snyder-Halpern in 1988 to evaluate the sleep quality of patients and healthy individuals. The Turkish validity reliability studywas performed by Çetinkaya and Karabulut in 2016. The Turkish form of the scale was created from 10 items without sub-dimensions and some items were removed, unlike the original. Each item in the scale is evaluated using the visual comparison technique on a chart from 0(at the left end) to 100 (at the right end). The Turkish form of thescale produces a score between 0 and 1000 under the title of sleepquality. The increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates that the quality of sleep decreases. |
On the 1 day of surgery |
|
Primary |
Visual Analog Sleep Scale (VASS) |
The VASS was developed by Verran and Snyder-Halpern in 1988 to evaluate the sleep quality of patients and healthy individuals. The Turkish validity reliability studywas performed by Çetinkaya and Karabulut in 2016. The Turkish form of the scale was created from 10 items without sub-dimensions and some items were removed, unlike the original. Each item in the scale is evaluated using the visual comparison technique on a chart from 0(at the left end) to 100 (at the right end). The Turkish form of thescale produces a score between 0 and 1000 under the title of sleepquality. The increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates that the quality of sleep decreases. |
1st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
Visual Analog Sleep Scale (VASS) |
The VASS was developed by Verran and Snyder-Halpern in 1988 to evaluate the sleep quality of patients and healthy individuals. The Turkish validity reliability studywas performed by Çetinkaya and Karabulut in 2016. The Turkish form of the scale was created from 10 items without sub-dimensions and some items were removed, unlike the original. Each item in the scale is evaluated using the visual comparison technique on a chart from 0(at the left end) to 100 (at the right end). The Turkish form of thescale produces a score between 0 and 1000 under the title of sleepquality. The increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates that the quality of sleep decreases. |
15st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
Visual Analog Sleep Scale (VASS) |
The VASS was developed by Verran and Snyder-Halpern in 1988 to evaluate the sleep quality of patients and healthy individuals. The Turkish validity reliability studywas performed by Çetinkaya and Karabulut in 2016. The Turkish form of the scale was created from 10 items without sub-dimensions and some items were removed, unlike the original. Each item in the scale is evaluated using the visual comparison technique on a chart from 0(at the left end) to 100 (at the right end). The Turkish form of thescale produces a score between 0 and 1000 under the title of sleepquality. The increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates that the quality of sleep decreases. |
30st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-40) |
The QoR-40 questionnaire, defined by Myles and colleagues in 2000, is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate patients' postoperative recovery quality and health status in the early postoperative stages. The QoR-40 consists of two parts, 40 items across five QoR dimensions: physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (9 items), physical independence (5 items), psychological support (7 items), and pain (7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one (worst) to five (best), where 1 = none of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = usually, 4 = most of the time, and 5 = all the time. The total score ranges from 40 (worst recovery quality) to 200 (best recovery quality). |
1 day before surgery |
|
Primary |
Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-40) |
The QoR-40 questionnaire, defined by Myles and colleagues in 2000, is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate patients' postoperative recovery quality and health status in the early postoperative stages. The QoR-40 consists of two parts, 40 items across five QoR dimensions: physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (9 items), physical independence (5 items), psychological support (7 items), and pain (7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one (worst) to five (best), where 1 = none of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = usually, 4 = most of the time, and 5 = all the time. The total score ranges from 40 (worst recovery quality) to 200 (best recovery quality). |
1st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-40) |
The QoR-40 questionnaire, defined by Myles and colleagues in 2000, is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate patients' postoperative recovery quality and health status in the early postoperative stages. The QoR-40 consists of two parts, 40 items across five QoR dimensions: physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (9 items), physical independence (5 items), psychological support (7 items), and pain (7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one (worst) to five (best), where 1 = none of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = usually, 4 = most of the time, and 5 = all the time. The total score ranges from 40 (worst recovery quality) to 200 (best recovery quality). |
15st day after surgery |
|
Primary |
Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-40) |
The QoR-40 questionnaire, defined by Myles and colleagues in 2000, is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate patients' postoperative recovery quality and health status in the early postoperative stages. The QoR-40 consists of two parts, 40 items across five QoR dimensions: physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (9 items), physical independence (5 items), psychological support (7 items), and pain (7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one (worst) to five (best), where 1 = none of the time, 2 = some of the time, 3 = usually, 4 = most of the time, and 5 = all the time. The total score ranges from 40 (worst recovery quality) to 200 (best recovery quality). |
30st day after surgery |
|