View clinical trials related to Child, Only.
Filter by:To the best of our knowledge, there is no Turkish validity and reliability scale that can reveal children's hand involvement. In the study in which the CAP-H was developed, it was stated that this scale could be used in population-level research studies to examine the similarities and differences in children's manual life participation among different diagnosis groups. It is very important to adapt translated assessment tools to different cultures and languages and to verify their reliability and validity. Moreover, self-report questionnaires are advantageous in that they can be used for large-scale testing. The aim of this study was to examine the convergent validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the "Children's Assessment of Participation with Hands (CAP-H)" scale in order to evaluate the hand participation of physically disabled children.
Studies evaluating VR are quite insufficient. In the study we determined in the emergency room between the ages of 4-10, cold vibration and virtual reality will be compared, and the success of the first attempt, pain, fear and anxiety will be evaluated.
Buzzy, shot-blocker, distraction cards, and balloon blowing can reduce fear and pain during the intramuscular intervention in the pediatric emergency service unit. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of virtual reality, manual pressure vibration technique, and cold vibration device application on procedure-related pain, fear, and anxiety during intramuscular antibiotics in children aged 5-12 years in the pediatric emergency department.
Children with hypotonic upper airway obstruction have a high prevalence of severe obstructive sleep apnea, which if not treated has significant clinical consequence. Available treatment approaches, such as surgery and positive airway pressure, show limited efficacy and adherence. The multidisciplinary team has developed and now proposes to further test a non-surgical, well-tolerated nasopharyngeal airway device that in initial patients has resolved even extremely severe obstructive sleep apnea, and improved patient and family quality of life.
The investigator want to determine the refractive status of 80 children with disabilities and of 81 healthy children from a witness group. The vitamin D level of the children will be dosed for making different correlations with visual acuity status.
Background: The faces version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDASf) is less time consuming and an easy to understand tool for measuring dental anxiety. The aim of this study was to develop the Turkish version of MCDASf and to analyze its validity and reliability.
A retrospective epidemiological study of pediatric pelvic injury from level 1 trauma centre. Hypothesis: In the pediatric population, majority of pelvic injuries is of type A according to AO/OTA (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association) classification, the treatment is mostly conservative and complications of injury and treatment are less common than in adults.
The most commonly used performance tests to evaluate upper extremity function in children diagnosed with rheumatic disease are the 9-hole peg test and Jebsen Taylor hand function tests. Although these tests have advantages such as being able to be applied in a short time, providing objective data, being easily applicable in the clinical environment, and being cost-effective, these tests are non-specific performance tests. Fine motor skills specific to rheumatic diseases, planned for children; There is no test battery that examines the mobility and position of each segment of the upper extremity during a function in detail. The Shriners Hospital for Children Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) is a video-based assessment approved for use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. In addition to spontaneous functional movement, it also evaluates the dynamical position, grip, and release movements of the upper extremity segments. Approved with a total of 22 questions/tasks observed for children aged 3-18. While the evaluation takes about 15 minutes, it takes about 15-30 minutes for the participant to score after the evaluation. The test battery can be created with the materials found in the physiotherapy clinic and is therefore very practical in terms of cost. In addition, due to the video recording of the evaluation, it provides a detailed examination opportunity to the evaluator both during and after the evaluation. However, it is superior to other tests in terms of creating a patient archive due to video recording. This study aimed to introduce SHUEE to the literature as a new assessment tool to be used in pediatric rheumatic pathologies. It is planned to include 25 volunteer pediatric patients diagnosed with rheumatic diseases in the study. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of SHUEE in children with a rheumatic diagnosis will be evaluated. For validity, the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire will be used.
The investigators are evaluating if the use of humanoid robots is an optimal distraction strategy in order to produce positive emotional states and facilitate the diagnosis and to reduce treatment time in pediatric age in emergency situations.
In children and adolescents (older than 6 years in age) who arrive in the pediatric emergency department because they have been having 5 days or less of abdominal pain (possible appendicitis), will patients who are treated with ketorolac get just as much pain relief as those patients treated with morphine? To answer this research question, we will need a large number of patients in a study. To ensure we have enough patients, we must include many hospitals in different cities and provinces in the same study. Before doing this, though, we must first test a smaller version of the study in our center at McMaster Children's hosptial. The goal of doing this at McMaster first is to make sure or understand: 1. We can enroll enough people in our study over 1 year 2. We can make sure that all the information we collect from patients is complete and nothing is missing 3. Reasons behind why people don't want to participate in the study 4. How satisfied patients and their caregivers were with the study