View clinical trials related to Cesarean Wound; Dehiscence.
Filter by:This aim of this study is to investigate the LUS in the pregnancy following a previous cesarean section with the use of barbed or conventional smooth suture.
EXCISION of cs section skin scar and subcutaneous release versus non removal in repeated cs .aRandomized controlled trial .
The optimal choice of skin closure at cesarean delivery has not yet been determined. This study will compare wound complications and scar healing following cesarean delivery between 2 methods of skin closure: glue (Dermabond®; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and monofilament (Monocryl®; Ethicon) epidermal sutures.
This study compares the effect of two techniques of uterine closure, with or without endometrial suturing on isthmocele development after cesarean section.
This study is a prospective observational study which will monitor how cesarean section in the first pregnancy will develop a cesarean scar defect. Patients with planned cesarean section in their first pregnancy and those with an emergency cesarean section will be monitored for one year.
This study was designed to evaluate the scar characteristics following scheduled and emergency cesarean deliveries.
A randomized controlled, parallel group, superiority, open-label, single-institution, Phase 3 interventional clinical trial to evaluate clinical outcomes in obese gravidas undergoing elective cesarean delivery whose wounds were dressed with the PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) versus the standard dressing. We hypothesize that the PICO NPWT will reduce the incidence of surgical site occurrences and interventions and postoperative readmissions in obese women. The study will compare surgical site occurrences and surgical incision intervention incidence within 42 +/- 10 days post cesarean delivery in obese women who have the current standard-of-care dressing versus the PICO NPWT.