Clinical Trials Logo

Cesarean Section clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Cesarean Section.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05646979 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

The Effect of Emotional Freedom Technique Applied Before Cesarean Section

Start date: December 31, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Since all the follow-up and care of the pregnant during the prenatal period are carried out by the midwives, the care provided by the midwives to the women during the prenatal period plays a key role for the woman to have a comfortable and healthy pregnancy. Midwives should take psychological approaches in order to reduce the negative feelings of women before cesarean section. Considering all these, it is thought that Emotional Freedom Technique, which does not require any invasive intervention, is inexpensive and easy to apply, will contribute to women's feeling better by reducing pre-cesarean anxiety, surgical fear and traumatic birth perception.

NCT ID: NCT05505110 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

MOdification Of THe Early-Life Respiratory Microbiome Through Vaginal SEEDing

MOTHER SEED
Start date: November 9, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a single-center, parallel-arm, blind, sham-controlled, feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) to be conducted in healthy cesarean-born infants. Eligible infants will be randomized 1:1 to have their nose swabbed with either maternal vaginal secretions or a sterile swab (intervention vs. control group, respectively) following birth by cesarean section (C-section). The main hypothesis is that conducting an RCT assessing the utility of vaginal seeding in modifying the early-life upper respiratory tract (URT) microbiome of infants born by C-section is feasible and that the intervention is safe.

NCT ID: NCT05358678 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Cesarean Section Scar Niche: The Impact on ART Outcome

Start date: May 25, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To evaluate the impact of the presence of cesarean section niche and its characteristics on the outcome of ART cycles.

NCT ID: NCT05343845 Recruiting - Pregnancy Clinical Trials

Does Smoking Effect Spinal Anesthesia?

Start date: February 28, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Background In the last 10 years, the rate of smoking in women of childbearing age has increased gradually. The smoking affects general anesthesia negatively. Can smoking also affect regional anesthesia in pregnant women? Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of smoking on spinal anesthesia applied for C/S in pregnant women. Methods After approval of the institution's ethics committee, 100 patients will divided in two groups as pregnant women who did not smoke during pregnancy and pregnant women who smoked 5 or more cigarettes in a day. The local anesthetic, which dose will be adjusted according to height and weight, and 20 µg fentanyl will administered intrathecally to both groups. Results on the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia will monitored. Results The data of 100 parturients will investigated. The onset time of sensory and motor block, the duration of motor and sensory block, APGAR and VAS scores will be monitored. In addition, C/S indications, side effects, patient satisfaction, additional medication need and, spinal anesthesia preferences will be monitored. Conclusions Smoking affects many systems. According to the onset of sensory block, duration of sensory and motor block and, VAS scores, which determine the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia, it will be evaluated whether smoking also affects spinal anesthesia in pregnant women.

NCT ID: NCT05314075 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Determination of Core Body Temperature in Parturient Warmed With Upper or Underbody Forced Air Cover (Bair Hugger)

Start date: December 27, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is intended to calculate the core body temperature in patients who are having a Cesarean Section (C/S) and are kept warm with an Upper Body Forced Air Warming device (Bair Hugger) or underbody forced air warmer. These warming devices are approved and are a required item in many if not all surgical procedures. They are used daily throughout the hospital. The research question is: Where is the best place to position the warming blanket in pregnant mothers undergoing Cesarean section delivery. The researchers hope to compare post - operative core body temperatures in patients getting an Upper Body forced air device versus those getting an Underbody Body forced air warming device.

NCT ID: NCT05299866 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

The Effect of S-ketamine Combined With Sufentanil for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Following Cesarean Section

Start date: April 12, 2022
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This randomized controlled trial is designed to investigate the effect of low-dose of S-ketamine combined with sufentanil for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in patients following cesarean section.

NCT ID: NCT05131178 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Post-operative Cesarean Trial of Pain Control

Start date: November 7, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study plans to learn more about postoperative pain management after cesarean deliveries (C-sections). As a part of standard of care, the Children's Hospital Colorado's Colorado Fetal Care Center (CFCC) follows the standard Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) guidelines to manage pain following C-section delivery. In addition, the CFCC uses an FDA approved medical device called the ON-Q ® Pump, which continuously delivers local anesthetic medication to control pain in the area of your procedure. The local anesthetic used is bupivacaine, which is FDA approved for use to control local pain after C-sections. The CFCC has found a significant reduction in opioid use after adopting both of these procedures. The study aims to determine if the ERAC protocol or ON-Q ® Pump continuous infusion is responsible for lower opioid use by comparing bupivacaine (treatment) versus saline (placebo) groups.

NCT ID: NCT05081804 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Cesarean Section on Neonatal Blood Glucose

Start date: October 20, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a set of evidence-based guidelines that may be used during perioperative care for cesarean section. While there is good evidence that following ERAS protocols benefits postoperative recovery, less is understood about the effect on the fetus and neonate. This will be a randomized equivalence trial to determine if drinking a carbohydrate rich drink prior to cesarean section has an effect on neonatal glucose.

NCT ID: NCT04979039 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Heart Rate Variability to Predict Hypotension Following Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery

Start date: August 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Based on the patient's heart rate variability, the analgesia nociception index (ANI) measures the activity of the autonomic nervous system and the sympathetic/parasympathetic nervous system and expresses it as a numerical value through a specific algorithm. The investigators will analyze it and see if it has the ability to predict severe hypotension following spinal anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT04955847 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol 25 μg vs. Vaginal Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor at Term

MISODINO
Start date: July 5, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Labor induction is a common medical technique. There is no consensus on which technique is better than the others. Misoprostol is an analogue of Prostaglandin E1 previously used off-label in labor induction. Its low cost, room-temperature storage, and diverse route options have made it an alternative to PGE2 in labor induction. As of 2018, oral misoprostol 25 μg tablet was licensed for labor induction. Very few studies have been performed on oral misoprostol 25 μg and none compared it with the PGE2s mostly used in induction on unfavorable cervix at term. The investigators compared the safety and the efficacy between the oral misoprostol 25 μg Angusta® used since 20/02/2020 and the vaginal dinoprostone previously used in gel or diffuser over two consecutive periods from 01/01/2019 to 19/02/2020 for the dinoprostone and from 20/02/2020 to 07/04/2021 for the misoprostol.