Clinical Trials Logo

Cesarean Section clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Cesarean Section.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03002636 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Safety and Risk Assessment of Obese Parturient Underwent Cesarean Section(CS) Delivery Under Different Anesthesia Ways

Start date: January 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

900 parturient who underwent CS under general anesthesia(GA) , intraspinal anesthesia included epidural anesthesia(EA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA), which were divided into 3 groups: Morbid Obesity group (n=300) with body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 , severe Obesity group (n=300) with 30 kg/m2≤BMI ≤40 kg/m2 and non-Obesity group(n=300) with BMI<30 kg/m2. Findings Between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016, a total of 1000 women met inclusion criteria and 900 women received allocated intervention. All patients were divided into three groups: Morbid Obesity group(n=300), Severe Obesity group(n=300) and non-Obesity group(n=300) according to body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2, 30 kg/m2≤BMI ≤40 kg/m2 and BMI<30 kg/m2.900 patients completed the protocol and related data were analysed.

NCT ID: NCT02987803 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Helping Mothers Select Better Childbirth Hospitals

Start date: August 15, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial of women who are pregnant or considering pregnancy to understand whether women provided with specific data on hospital-level cesarean delivery rates are more likely to select higher quality hospitals, defined as hospitals with cesarean delivery rates below the Federal HealthyPeople 2020 target of 23.9%.

NCT ID: NCT02977871 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Bladder Flap Versus Omission of Flap During Cesarean Section of Primiparous Women

Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed on women. Over the years minor variations of each surgical step have been introduced, and cesarean sections are not standardized and many different techniques are employed during surgery. Creation of a bladder flap has been an integral surgical step of the cesarean section for many years. The role of the bladder flap and its usefulness in cesarean section is not known well. Further, in some cases the bladder flap is omitted during cesarean section. The aim of the current study is to compare operating time and postoperative urinary symptoms in cesarean sections using either bladder flap or omission of flap.

NCT ID: NCT02962011 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Trial Comparing Barbed and Non-barbed Suture for Uterine Incision Closure at Cesarean Section

barbed
Start date: August 1, 2016
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This was an unblinded randomized controlled trial. Women were randomized to uterine closure with the knotless barbed suture (Stratafix PDS, Ethicon) or Vicryl (Ethicon) at the time of elective cesarean. The primary outcome was closure time of the uterine incision. Also measured were blood loss during incision closure and the use of additional hemostatic sutures. Informed consent was obtained

NCT ID: NCT02961842 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Combined Colloid Preload And Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Start date: November 20, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study will compare one technique of fluid administration (combined colloid preload and crystalloid colaod) with another one (crystalloid coload) during elective cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT02956616 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Enhanced Recovery at Cesarean Birth to Improve Postoperative Outcomes and Reduce Postoperative Length of Stay

ERAC
Start date: September 1, 2017
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

To determine whether women randomized to an enhanced recovery program will have improved postoperative outcomes including improved breastfeeding initiation and continuation, reduction in hospital length of stay without compromising patient satisfaction in comparison to standard postoperative recovery interventions.

NCT ID: NCT02901613 Recruiting - Morbid Obesity Clinical Trials

Prophylactic Post-Cesarean Incisional Negative-pressure Wound Therapy in Morbidly Obese Patients

Start date: August 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy in decreasing wound complications in morbidly obese patients (BMI greater than of equal to 40) at Albany Medical Center Hospital. Retrospective data will be collected regarding morbidly obese patients who have undergone cesarean section and patients will be recruited to have the intervention (negative-pressure wound therapy) applied and outcomes will be evaluated.

NCT ID: NCT02899260 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Using the Peanut Exercise Ball to Reduce Cesarean Section Rates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Start date: August 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial that will compare the use of the peanut exercise ball in laboring patients compared with no use of the exercise ball. We hypothesize that use of the peanut ball decreases the incidence of cesarean section.

NCT ID: NCT02872181 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

An Evaluation of Maternal Position During Cesarean Delivery

Start date: April 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

During Cesarean Delivery pregnant women are frequently tilted to the left 15 degress to reduce compression of the major blood vessels by the uterus. Despite this common practice, there is no conclusive evidence to support this practice. In fact it may even be deleterious to have women positioned in this position. The aim of the study is to determine whether or not tilting women to the left during cesarean section (CS) is helpful or detrimental. The authors hypothesize that left uterine displacement of 15 degrees, which is commonly employed, is useless for preventing compression of these blood vessels. To investigate this question, women will be randomly assigned to either be tilted 15 degrees to the left during CS or positioned flat on the table. Fetal acid base status, vasopressor/phenylephrine use, patient satisfaction, maternal complications, and fetal complications will all be collected and compared.

NCT ID: NCT02871713 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intrathecal Morphine With Quadratus Lumborum Block for Post-cesarean Delivery Analgesia

Start date: May 30, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pain after caesarean delivery (CD) can interfere with the moms' ability to look after her baby and may contribute to developing long term pain and disability. Women having a CD receive pain medication (morphine) as part of their spinal anesthetic to help with pain relief after surgery. Morphine works well however has several side effects such as nausea, vomiting and itching which may be severe enough to make it difficult to care for herself and her new baby. In some cases, morphine causes difficulty in passing urine within first 24-hours of the CD requiring catheterization and thus restricting mobilization. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newer nerve block that uses local anaesthetic solution to numb the nerves carrying pain sensation from surgical incision site. QLB may be able to provide effective pain control without the side-effects associated with the spinal morphine. This study is to determine if women receiving QLB have as good pain control with fewer side effects than those who do receive the spinal morphine. Adequate pain control will be assessed by their pain scores and recovery in the 24 to 48 hours after CD. The side effect profile of the two techniques, quality of recovery and long term impact will also be compared during this study. In addition, we would like to compare the patients who received both analgesic regimens (ITM and QLB) with patients who received only one analgesic intervention (i.e. either ITM or QLB). Further, the study will help us answer if combining the two analgesic interventions if beneficial or not.