View clinical trials related to Cesarean Section; Dehiscence.
Filter by:The objective of this randomized monocentric study is to assess potential variations in the incidence and severity of isthmocele morbidity among women undergoing cesarean section with either single or double-layer closure of the hysterotomy. Our primary outcome aims to investigate whether there is a reduction in the median duration of intermenstrual spotting in patients belonging to the two respective closure groups
Hysteroscopic Isthmocele repair on IVF outcome It aims to assesse the efficacy of Hysteroscopic CS scar defect repair on the clinical pregnancy rate after embryo transfer. Patients who were diagnosed with significant caesarean section scar defect and had a previous unsuccessful ongoing pregnancy after embryo transfer of one or more euploid embryo and planning for another trial of one euploid embryo transfer will be assed for study eligibility. Twenty five of them will be be randomized to hysteroscopic repair before having embryo transfer. and 25 will go directly for embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy rate is the primary outcome.
The main objective of this study is to compare the time taken to obtain "street fitness" status for women after extraperitoneal cesarean section compared to women after a classic cesarean section.
GnRH-a will be used to postpone period after vaginal repair for Cesarean Section Scar Defect（CSD） patients with adenomyosis which will be compared with CSD patients with adenomyosis who receive transvaginal surgery without GnRH-a, whether delayed period improving the CSD prognosis will be assessed.
To compare scar infiltration with 0.5-1% Lidocaine at a dose of 3 mg/kg (max dose 300 mg) or scar deactivation with acupuncture surface release technique to determine which is more effective in reducing pain in adult patients with chronic, post-surgical pain related to the site of incision after low transverse Cesarean section compared to standard of care physical therapy with the McKenzie Method.
To study and evaluate the Effectiveness of Treatment by Percutaneous Electrical NeuroStimulation (PENS) for post-operative pain in Cesarean Section patients using First Relief
To determine if mechanical labour induction can offer a safer and effective alternative to prostaglandins to women with previous caesarean section attempting trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC).
In recent decades, the percentage of Cesarean section deliveries has dramatically increased in most countries. Concomitantly, the rates of vaginal birth after Cesarean have decreased steadily. The pregnant women with previous Cesarean section face a difficult choice for their next delivery between a trial of labor after Cesarean or repeat caesarean section delivery. The performance of multiple Cesarean section exposes women to greater risks of complications; furthermore, the risk of complications increases with each subsequent Cesarean section. In fact, women with previous Cesarean section are more likely to experience short and long-term maternal complications in future pregnancies, or a trial of labor after Cesarean, with the risk of [uterine dehiscence, uterine rupture, genitourinary tract damage, hemorrhage and hysterectomy, abnormal placentation (placenta previa and placenta accreta) and difficulties during surgery