Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03570710 |
Other study ID # |
aswu/183/10/17 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 1, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
August 1, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2021 |
Source |
Aswan University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
PAS is an obstetrics condition that is closely linked with massive obstetrical hemorrhage
with a varied incidence about once in every 533 live births. It is considered one of the
causes of massive transfusion (>4 units of packed red blood cells) and cesarean hysterectomy.
It is estimated that peripartum hysterectomies are performed in approximately0.08% of all
deliveries. A large study from the United Kingdom noted that 38% were a result of PAS. More
recently, population-based analyses show that PAS is the indication for the majority of
peripartum hysterectomies.
Bleeding at the time of peripartum hysterectomy for PAS is often substantial. Nearly 90% of
patients need blood products, while 38% of patients need a massive blood transfusion.
There is a 30% risk of an ICU admission, thromboembolic disease, readmission, reoperation,
poor wound healing, and a reported rate of surgical re-exploration ranging from 4% to 33%.
The risk of maternal death reported being as high as 7% (although less in most recent series)
Therefore, adequate homeostatic techniques are essential. Currently, surgical hemostasis can
be secured by a variety of methods, including mechanical sutures (or clamping), electric
coagulation, ultrasonically activated scalpel or drugs.
TA is a lysine analog which acts as an antifibrinolytic via competitive inhibition of the
binding of plasmin and plasminogen to fibrin. The rationale for its use in the reduction of
blood loss depending on the implication of the coagulation and fibrinolysis processes .
However, concerns about possible thromboembolic events with the parental administration of TA
has stimulated increasing interest in its topical Use
Description:
Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups. Group (I): patients received 110
ml normal saline IV just before skin incision Group (II): patients received 1 gm TA (2
ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision.
Group (III): patients received 2 gm topical TA (4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml) applied on
the placental bed after placental delivery. Patients were randomized to three groups, each
compromised of 43 patients according to a three-blocked randomization list which was coded (1
or 2 or 3) at 1:1:1 ratio. The three parallel groups were prepared using a Computer-generated
randomization system. The allocated groups will be concealed in serially numbered sealed
opaque envelopes that will only be opened after recruitment. The patient allocation will be
performed prior to the induction of anesthesia by an independent person, who will not
otherwise be involved in this study. The trial will be appropriately blinded; the
participants, outcome assessors and the surgeon performing the procedure will be blinded to
the medication type, which will be used. In all eligible participants, CH was performed under
general anesthesia by the same operative and anesthesia team. A dose of 1 g of
first-generation cephalosporin (Cefazolin®; Bristol Mayers Squibb, Cairo, Egypt) was
administered intravenously immediately prior to skin incision. The abdomen was exposed
through Pfannensteil incision. After skin incision, the subcutaneous fat and abdominal fascia
were opened crosswise, and the rectus muscle was opened on the midline, the parietal
peritoneum was opened longitudinally, the visceral peritoneum was opened transversely and
dissected downwards with the bladder and kept against symphysis pubis by a Doyen retractor,
followed by transverse incision of the uterus at the upper border of the placenta to avoid
transplacental incision which provoke severe bleeding.
Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups after induction of general
anesthesia and immediately prior to the operation and just before skin incision. they
received 1-gram tranexamic acid (10 ml) in 100 ml saline infusion or placebo (110 normal
saline) by slow intravenous injection at an approximate rate of 1 mL per min. Throughout the
operation irrigation was done by 60 ml of (2g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 100 ml of
sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.).At the end of operation
another dose of 60 ml of (1g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 50 ml of sodium chloride
0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) was left intraabdominal then 1
intraperitoneal suction drain was routinely used in all patients the drains were closed for 3
hour postoperative , after that time the drains were opened and removed on the second
postoperative day unless otherwise indicated.. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration of
topical tranexamic acid, it was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound
surface. 20 ml moistens at least 1500 cm2.