Botulinum Toxin Injection in Neck Muscles in Cervicogenic Headache

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect and side-effects of injections with botulinum toxin in neck muscles in cervicogenic headache compared to injections with sodium water.

Clinical Trial Description

Cervicogenic headache is a unilateral headache stemming from the neck. Usually, there are no pathological findings on x-ray or MRI of the neck. It is supposed that pain may stem from various structures in the upper part of the cervical spine. Regardless of the source, it is often believed that the neck muscles may be involved in the pain generation, either primarily or secondarily.

Treatment of cervicogenic headache is often difficult. The effect of drugs is usually limited. Various surgical techniques such as radiofrequency generation of the facet joints in the neck have been tried, but with little success (4).

Botulinum toxin injection in muscles have for several years been used in conditions with pathologically increased muscle activity, such as spasticity and dystonias. Gradually, it has also been used in many pain conditions, among them headaches. One case history (5) and a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind study (6), have shown effect in cervicogenic headache. The latter study had some methodological weaknesses, since it was small, only 26 patients, and the placebo group had prior to treatment only half as much pain as the group receiving botulinum toxin treatment. In addition, pain was not registered daily, but only before (prior) treatment and after 3 or 4 weeks. A review considers the documentation on treatment with botulinum toxin in idiopathic and cervicogenic headaches to be inconclusive (7).

In our Department, we have tried this treatment on a few patients with typical cervicogenic headache with excellent effect and without side-effects. Therefore, it would be of considerable interest to perform a larger study with good scientific quality and a higher statistical power than the above-mentioned one.

As the basis for our study we would adopt a conservative hypothesis (H0): Botox injections in cervical muscles is not superior to placebo in alleviating pain in unilateral cervicogenic headache. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT00184197
Study type	Interventional
Source	Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 2
Start date	May 2005
Completion date	December 2009

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05545423` - Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Proprioception and Disability in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05289414` - Radiofrquency Targeting Mid Cervical Medial Branches vs GON in Cervicogenic Headache	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01687881` - Is Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy an Efficient Treatment Option in Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05617365` - Treating Chronic Cervicogenic Head and Neck Pain	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT05491915` - The MONARCH Case Series Study: SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Head Pain	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02908984` - Specific Neck Rehabilitation for Unilateral Headache and Neck Pain, and Structural and Functional Changes in the Brain	N/A
Completed	`NCT01790074` - Trigger Point Therapy in Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03730896` - Effectiveness of Dry Needling of the Sternocleidomastoid in Patients With Cervicogenic Headaches	N/A
Completed	`NCT05582616` - The Safety and Feasibility of tDCS Combined With Conservative Treatment for Cervicogenic Headaches	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06459726` - Effects of Shi Style Cervical Mobilization Versus SNAGS in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Completed	`NCT04521218` - Thrust Joint Manipulation and Reverse SNAGS (Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides) in Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Completed	`NCT04625387` - Dry Needle In Management of Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Completed	`NCT05865808` - Effects of Sustained Natural Appophyseal Glide Versus Rocababo 6x6 Program in Subjects With Cervicogenic Headache.	N/A
Completed	`NCT05827185` - Effects of Workstation Ergonomics and Physiotherapy in Cervicogenic Headache.	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03919630` - Mobilization Versus Manipulation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headaches	N/A
Completed	`NCT04454541` - Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Multifidus Cervicis Plan Block Vs Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Completed	`NCT04242290` - Cervicospinal Posture and Pain in Cervicogenic Headache
Completed	`NCT05754931` - Deep Neck Flexors Training Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Cervicogenic Headache	N/A
Completed	`NCT05849545` - Effects of Garston Tool and Neuromuscular Reeducation in Cervical Headache	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05312645` - Diclofenac Gel in the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache	Phase 3

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.