Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will highlight and validate chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) for cervicogenic headache (CEH). If the method proves to be effective, it will provide a new non-pharmacological treatment option for CEH. This is especially important since pharmacological management has minor effect in CEH, and alternative treatment options are warranted. The applied methodology of the study will aim towards the highest possible research standards. This international study is a collaboration between Akershus University Hospital, Innlandet Hospital and University of Oslo (UiO), Norway and Macquarie University, Australia. The multidisciplinary professional backgrounds are physiotherapy, chiropractic and medicine. By increasing the methodological quality of the investigators research to a very high level, the investigators see the method to work as a guide to increase the quality of chiropractic research in the future, as previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of CEH used methodology showing room for improvement.

Study hypothesis:

CSMT using the Gonstead method reduces days with CEH by at least 25% as compared to placebo (sham manipulation, i.e. broad non-specific contact, non-directional, low velocity and low amplitude) and no intervention (control group).


Clinical Trial Description

Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is a symptomatic headache characterized by chronic unilateral headache and symptoms and signs of neck involvement. CEH is often worsened by neck movement, sustained awkward head position, external pressure over the upper cervical or occipital region on the symptomatic side. Abolition of the headache following diagnostic anesthetic blocks of cervical structures or local factors in neck give evidence that the pain is attributed to a neck disorder or lesion. The prevalence of CEH is 0.2% in the general population of Akershus County, i.e. 9,000 Norwegians have CEH. However, the prevalence varies between 0.4-4.1% in studies applying less rigorous diagnostic criteria. The efficacy of pharmacological management in CEH is poor. Patients suffering from CEH are commonly treated with CSMT, but the methodology has one or more shortcomings in all studies. In addition, the RCTs mostly included participant with infrequent CEH and did not follow the recommended clinical guidelines by the International Headache Society (IHS) of intervention of at least three months. An analysis of the literature as well as a recent pilot study suggests that CSMT has an effect on headache intensity and duration, and medication intake. However, a randomized controlled clinical trial with high methodological quality on CEH still remains to be conducted.

The RCT is single blinded, placebo-controlled trial of CSMT using the Gonstead method vs. sham manipulation and control group. If the treatment shows to be effective, the participants whom receive sham manipulation or control will be offered true intervention after the follow-up period and free of charge. This study will follow the recommendations set by the clinical trial guidelines from the IHS, while the methodological quality control will in general follow previous suggested criteria and the CONSORT statements.

Patients will be recruited through Akershus University Hospital and Innlandet Hospital, Norway as well as through media advertising in Akershus and Oslo County. The diagnose is set by a chiropractor and a neurologist with experience in headache.

The clinical trials consist of three stages: Run-in, intervention (treatment) and follow-up.

One month of base line data collection where participants will fill-in a diagnostic headache diary. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics will be presented in tables with mean and standard deviation (SD) for each group.

The participants will be randomized by drawing prepared sealed lots. Each lot includes three different interventions, i.e active treatment, sham manipulation and control group. The first three participants will draw from the same lot until all three interventions are used. The next lot with three interventions is then followed by the next three participants.

The RCTs will be conducted by an experienced chiropractor. Active treatment consists of CSMT using the Gonstead method. A specific contact, high velocity, low amplitude, short lever, with no recoil post adjustment directed to spinal biomechanical dysfunction diagnosed by standard chiropractic tests.

Follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. During this period participants continue to fill in a diagnostic headache diary. The control group will also be included in this phase of the study.

The data will be analyzed with SPSS using standard statistical techniques.

The investigators based our calculation of sample size on migraine days from recent group comparison studies of topiramate (38). The investigators calculated that a sample size of 16 patients was required to detect a difference in mean reduction in monthly headache days of 2.5 with 80% power, with p=0.05 as level of significance, and assuming a common SD of 2.5 for active treatment and broad-based treatment groups.

Insurance is through "The Norwegian System of Compensation to Patients" (NPE) which is an independent national body, set up to process compensation claims from patients who have suffered an injury as a result of treatment under the Norwegian health service.

The Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (REK) in Norway and Norwegian Social Science Data Services approved the full PhD research protocol. The declaration of Helsinski is followed. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01687881
Study type Interventional
Source University Hospital, Akershus
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date September 2012
Completion date May 2014

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05545423 - Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Proprioception and Disability in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05289414 - Radiofrquency Targeting Mid Cervical Medial Branches vs GON in Cervicogenic Headache Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05617365 - Treating Chronic Cervicogenic Head and Neck Pain Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05491915 - The MONARCH Case Series Study: SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Head Pain N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02908984 - Specific Neck Rehabilitation for Unilateral Headache and Neck Pain, and Structural and Functional Changes in the Brain N/A
Completed NCT01790074 - Trigger Point Therapy in Cervicogenic Headache N/A
Terminated NCT03730896 - Effectiveness of Dry Needling of the Sternocleidomastoid in Patients With Cervicogenic Headaches N/A
Recruiting NCT05582616 - The Safety and Feasibility of tDCS Combined With Conservative Treatment for Cervicogenic Headaches N/A
Completed NCT04521218 - Thrust Joint Manipulation and Reverse SNAGS (Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides) in Cervicogenic Headache N/A
Completed NCT00184197 - Botulinum Toxin Injection in Neck Muscles in Cervicogenic Headache Phase 2
Completed NCT04625387 - Dry Needle In Management of Cervicogenic Headache N/A
Completed NCT05865808 - Effects of Sustained Natural Appophyseal Glide Versus Rocababo 6x6 Program in Subjects With Cervicogenic Headache. N/A
Completed NCT05827185 - Effects of Workstation Ergonomics and Physiotherapy in Cervicogenic Headache. Phase 2
Completed NCT04454541 - Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Multifidus Cervicis Plan Block Vs Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Cervicogenic Headache N/A
Completed NCT03919630 - Mobilization Versus Manipulation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headaches N/A
Completed NCT04242290 - Cervicospinal Posture and Pain in Cervicogenic Headache
Completed NCT05754931 - Deep Neck Flexors Training Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Cervicogenic Headache N/A
Completed NCT05849545 - Effects of Garston Tool and Neuromuscular Reeducation in Cervical Headache N/A
Recruiting NCT05312645 - Diclofenac Gel in the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache Phase 3
Completed NCT01988363 - Greater Occipital Nerve Injection Study Phase 1