Cervical Radiculopathy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Rotation-traction Manipulation of Different Treatment Frequency in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
The evidence for different frequencies of rotation-traction manipulation treatment in cervical radiculopathy is insufficient. This study determined whether 3 sessions per week of rotation-traction manipulation treatment are superior to 1 session per week for symptomatic outcomes in cervical radiculopathy based on a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 216 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | April 30, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 40 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Conforming to the diagnostic criteria outlined in the 2010 North American Spine Society "An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders". 2. Aged between 40 and 65 years. 3. VAS score = 4 points. 4. Duration of the condition = 5 years. 5. Voluntary signature of informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Combined with other types of cervical spondylosis. 2. Suspected or confirmed cases of cervical spine or intraspinal tumor, or intracranial tumor. 3. Patients with unclear diagnosis of spinal injury or symptoms of spinal cord injury. 4. Patients with developmental spinal canal stenosis (vertebral canal ratio = sagittal diameter of vertebral canal / sagittal diameter of vertebral body < 0.75). 5. Those suffering from severe heart, lung, brain, liver, kidney, or hematopoietic system diseases. 6. Conditions such as spinal tuberculosis, osteomyelitis, and osteoporosis. 7. Individuals who have undergone cervical spine surgery and those with cervical spine deformities. 8. Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding women. 9. Participants unable to complete this clinical study due to mental illness, cognitive, or emotional disorders. 10. Those who have participated in other clinical studies in the past 3 months. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences | Beijing | Beijing |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences | Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
China,
Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, Kreiner DS, Reitman C, Summers JT, Baisden JL, Easa J, Fernand R, Lamer T, Matz PG, Mazanec DJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Sharma AK, Timmons RB, Toton JF; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2011 Jan;11(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.023. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "painless" marked at one end and "severe pain" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of pain. Painless is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild pain; 4-6 points represent moderate pain, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe pain, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe pain. The higher score indicates more severe pain. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "painless" marked at one end and "severe pain" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of pain. Painless is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild pain; 4-6 points represent moderate pain, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe pain, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe pain. The higher score indicates more severe pain. | 2 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "painless" marked at one end and "severe pain" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of pain. Painless is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild pain; 4-6 points represent moderate pain, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe pain, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe pain. The higher score indicates more severe pain. | 8 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "painless" marked at one end and "severe pain" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of pain. Painless is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild pain; 4-6 points represent moderate pain, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe pain, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe pain. The higher score indicates more severe pain. | 12 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "painless" marked at one end and "severe pain" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of pain. Painless is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild pain; 4-6 points represent moderate pain, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe pain, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe pain. The higher score indicates more severe pain. | 16 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain | The Visual Analog Scale for Pain is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "painless" marked at one end and "severe pain" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of pain. Painless is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild pain; 4-6 points represent moderate pain, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe pain, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe pain. The higher score indicates more severe pain. | 20 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness is a tool used to assess the intensity of numbness experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "unnumbness" marked at one end and "severe numbness" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of numbness. Unnumbness is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild numbness; 4-6 points represent moderate numbness, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe numbness, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe numbness. The higher score indicates more severe numbness. | 2 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness is a tool used to assess the intensity of numbness experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "unnumbness" marked at one end and "severe numbness" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of numbness. Unnumbness is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild numbness; 4-6 points represent moderate numbness, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe numbness, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe numbness. The higher score indicates more severe numbness. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness is a tool used to assess the intensity of numbness experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "unnumbness" marked at one end and "severe numbness" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of numbness. Unnumbness is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild numbness; 4-6 points represent moderate numbness, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe numbness, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe numbness. The higher score indicates more severe numbness. | 8 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness is a tool used to assess the intensity of numbness experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "unnumbness" marked at one end and "severe numbness" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of numbness. Unnumbness is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild numbness; 4-6 points represent moderate numbness, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe numbness, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe numbness. The higher score indicates more severe numbness. | 12 weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness is a tool used to assess the intensity of numbness experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "unnumbness" marked at one end and "severe numbness" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of numbness. Unnumbness is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild numbness; 4-6 points represent moderate numbness, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe numbness, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe numbness. The higher score indicates more severe numbness. | 16weeks | |
Secondary | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness | The Visual Analog Scale for Numbness is a tool used to assess the intensity of numbness experienced by an individual. It consists of a straight line with "unnumbness" marked at one end and "severe numbness" at the other. The individual is asked to mark on the line the point that represents their current level of numbness. Unnumbness is represented by 0; 1-3 points represent mild numbness; 4-6 points represent moderate numbness, which is strong but tolerable; 7-10 points represent severe numbness, gradually reaching intolerable level, which is severe numbness. The higher score indicates more severe numbness. | 20 weeks | |
Secondary | The Neck Disability Index | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess disability related to neck pain. It consists of ten items that evaluate different aspects of a person's daily activities and the impact of neck pain on their functionality. The NDI covers areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. The total score is then calculated by summing up the individual scores for each item, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 50. Higher scores on the NDI indicate greater disability and impairment due to neck pain. | 2 weeks | |
Secondary | The Neck Disability Index | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess disability related to neck pain. It consists of ten items that evaluate different aspects of a person's daily activities and the impact of neck pain on their functionality. The NDI covers areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. The total score is then calculated by summing up the individual scores for each item, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 50. Higher scores on the NDI indicate greater disability and impairment due to neck pain. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | The Neck Disability Index | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess disability related to neck pain. It consists of ten items that evaluate different aspects of a person's daily activities and the impact of neck pain on their functionality. The NDI covers areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. The total score is then calculated by summing up the individual scores for each item, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 50. Higher scores on the NDI indicate greater disability and impairment due to neck pain. | 8 weeks | |
Secondary | The Neck Disability Index | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess disability related to neck pain. It consists of ten items that evaluate different aspects of a person's daily activities and the impact of neck pain on their functionality. The NDI covers areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. The total score is then calculated by summing up the individual scores for each item, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 50. Higher scores on the NDI indicate greater disability and impairment due to neck pain. | 12 weeks | |
Secondary | The Neck Disability Index | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess disability related to neck pain. It consists of ten items that evaluate different aspects of a person's daily activities and the impact of neck pain on their functionality. The NDI covers areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. The total score is then calculated by summing up the individual scores for each item, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 50. Higher scores on the NDI indicate greater disability and impairment due to neck pain. | 16 weeks | |
Secondary | The Neck Disability Index | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess disability related to neck pain. It consists of ten items that evaluate different aspects of a person's daily activities and the impact of neck pain on their functionality. The NDI covers areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. The total score is then calculated by summing up the individual scores for each item, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 50. Higher scores on the NDI indicate greater disability and impairment due to neck pain. | 20 weeks | |
Secondary | The Short Form 12 | The Short Form 12 (SF-12) consists of 12 questions that cover various aspects of physical and mental health. It is designed to be a concise yet comprehensive measure of health status. The SF-12 questionnaire includes questions related to physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each question has multiple response options, and the responses are scored and aggregated to produce summary scores for physical health and mental health components. The SF-12 provides two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The total scores vary based on individual responses and can range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health status and 0 representing the worst. | 2 weeks | |
Secondary | The Short Form 12 | The Short Form 12 (SF-12) consists of 12 questions that cover various aspects of physical and mental health. It is designed to be a concise yet comprehensive measure of health status. The SF-12 questionnaire includes questions related to physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each question has multiple response options, and the responses are scored and aggregated to produce summary scores for physical health and mental health components. The SF-12 provides two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The total scores vary based on individual responses and can range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health status and 0 representing the worst. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | The Short Form 12 | The Short Form 12 (SF-12) consists of 12 questions that cover various aspects of physical and mental health. It is designed to be a concise yet comprehensive measure of health status. The SF-12 questionnaire includes questions related to physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each question has multiple response options, and the responses are scored and aggregated to produce summary scores for physical health and mental health components. The SF-12 provides two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The total scores vary based on individual responses and can range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health status and 0 representing the worst. | 8 weeks | |
Secondary | The Short Form 12 | The Short Form 12 (SF-12) consists of 12 questions that cover various aspects of physical and mental health. It is designed to be a concise yet comprehensive measure of health status. The SF-12 questionnaire includes questions related to physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each question has multiple response options, and the responses are scored and aggregated to produce summary scores for physical health and mental health components. The SF-12 provides two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The total scores vary based on individual responses and can range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health status and 0 representing the worst. | 12 weeks | |
Secondary | The Short Form 12 | The Short Form 12 (SF-12) consists of 12 questions that cover various aspects of physical and mental health. It is designed to be a concise yet comprehensive measure of health status. The SF-12 questionnaire includes questions related to physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each question has multiple response options, and the responses are scored and aggregated to produce summary scores for physical health and mental health components. The SF-12 provides two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The total scores vary based on individual responses and can range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health status and 0 representing the worst. | 16 weeks | |
Secondary | The Short Form 12 | The Short Form 12 (SF-12) consists of 12 questions that cover various aspects of physical and mental health. It is designed to be a concise yet comprehensive measure of health status. The SF-12 questionnaire includes questions related to physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each question has multiple response options, and the responses are scored and aggregated to produce summary scores for physical health and mental health components. The SF-12 provides two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The total scores vary based on individual responses and can range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible health status and 0 representing the worst. | 20 weeks | |
Secondary | The total cost | The total cost includes registration fees, treatment fees, examination fees, loss of income, transportation expenses, and so on. Record the total costs for each group of patients over a 4-week treatment period. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | The recurrence rate | The recurrence rate is defined as the percentage of individuals experiencing a reappearance of symptoms and signs similar to those before treatment during the follow-up period, among the total number of revisit cases. | 20 weeks | |
Secondary | Expectation of Treatment and Credibility Scale | The Expectation of Treatment and Credibility Scale (ETCS) is a questionnaire commonly used in clinical practice to assess patients' expectations of treatment outcomes and their perceived credibility of the treatment. Responses on the ETCS are usually rated on a Likert 9-point scale (from 0 to 9), with options ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" or "not at all credible" to "extremely credible." Scores are then calculated to provide quantitative measures of patients' expectations and perceived credibility of the treatment. Overall, higher ETCS scores generally indicate higher patient expectations for treatment options and greater trust in treatment. This may help improve the effectiveness of treatment and patient satisfaction. Evaluation was performed after the first treatment and at 4 weeks of treatment. | 1 day | |
Secondary | Expectation of Treatment and Credibility Scale | The Expectation of Treatment and Credibility Scale (ETCS) is a questionnaire commonly used in clinical practice to assess patients' expectations of treatment outcomes and their perceived credibility of the treatment. Responses on the ETCS are usually rated on a Likert 9-point scale (from 0 to 9), with options ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" or "not at all credible" to "extremely credible." Scores are then calculated to provide quantitative measures of patients' expectations and perceived credibility of the treatment. Overall, higher ETCS scores generally indicate higher patient expectations for treatment options and greater trust in treatment. This may help improve the effectiveness of treatment and patient satisfaction. Evaluation was performed after the first treatment and at 4 weeks of treatment. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Adverse reactions | Recording whether patients experience adverse reactions such as progressive worsening of neck pain, upper limb pain, and restricted neck movement, dizziness, chest tightness, palpitations, etc., during the treatment and follow-up. | Up to 20 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06102304 -
Myo-Electrical and Nerve Root Function Response to Focused Extracorpeal Shock Wave in Cervical Radiculopathy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06220799 -
Impact of Craniovertebral Angle on Dizziness and Risk of Falling in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT01944150 -
Association of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Hypnosis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01495728 -
Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00695006 -
Manual Therapy, Exercise and Traction for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A RCT
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00344890 -
Safety Study of Preservon-Treated Bone Implants for Cervical Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy or Myelopathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03382821 -
Comparative Trial Via Tranforaminal Approach Versus Epidural Catheter Via Interlaminar Approach
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04915222 -
Manual Cervical Traction and Natural Apophyseal Glides for Cervical Radiculopathy Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06043934 -
Neural Mobilization With Intermittent Cervical Traction on Grip Strength, Sleep Quality, and Quality of Life in Cervical Radiculopathy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06040047 -
Prediction of Cervical Radiculopathy Success With PNF and Mobilization
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04544683 -
Effectiveness of Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03674619 -
Cervical Radiculopathy Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04597112 -
Effect of Myofascial Release Technique In Patients With Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06457529 -
The Effect of Dry Needling and Prolotherapy on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04598113 -
Effect of Cervical Traction on Balance in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06339970 -
Effects of Slider Versus Tensioners Nerve Gliding in Cervical Radiculopathy.
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02694250 -
Evaluation of Cervical Fusion With DTRAX® Cervical Cage With DTRAX Bone Screw
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02081456 -
Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Therapeutic Ultrasound for Subjects With Neck and Arm Pain
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00308594 -
Oral Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05887427 -
Acute Effect of Neural Mobilization in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Study
|
N/A |