View clinical trials related to Cervical Radiculopathy.
Filter by:FACADE is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel group non-inferiority trial comparing the traditional hospital surveillance (inpatient, patients staying in the hospital for 1-3 nights after surgery) to outpatient care (discharge on the day of the surgery, usually within 6-8 hours after procedure) in patients who have undergone anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) procedure.
Cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy are common degenerative disorders, which can create a large amount of social and medical burden. The aims of this study are(1) to investigate the functional outcomes progression before and after surgery, (2) to evaluate the biomechanical change and compensatory patterns of patients with or without decompression surgery, and (3) to design innovation intervention for the patients with cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.
Do cervical epidural steroid injections done by transforaminal catheter targeted approach improve pain and function in patients with cervical radicular pain?
Sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGS), is a form of manual therapy, involved a combination of a sustained facet glide with active motion, followed by overpressure. Natural apophseal glides (NAGS), a modification of SNAGS, involves a mid to end-range facet joint mobilisation applied anterocranially or posterioanteriorly along the plane of treatment, combined with a small amount of manual traction which increases movement within the spine, and decreases symptomatic pain . A study reported that Natural Apophyseal Glides (NAGS) and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) demonstrated significant effects in reducing pain and disability in subjects with chronic neck pain . This technique, SNAGS, is however an evolving manual therapy techniques which its effectiveness has not been thoroughly investigated in cervical radiculopathy treatment raised author's curiosity to compare and document efficacy of SNAGS with cervical traction in Nigeria since comparative studies evaluating SNAGS and manual cervical traction relative efficacies among Nigerians are yet to be documented if at all available. Consequently, the quest is to look for a quicker and a better way of relieving cervical radiculopathy in this environment . The more reason why we have to compare it with a conventional mechanical traction.
Background & Purpose: Cervical radiculopathy is a neurological disorder, which commonly results because of nerve compression. There are different types of physical therapy interventions that are used for cervical radiculopathy. The evidence of effectiveness of manual therapy in cervical radiculopathy is still limited. Short-term hypoalgesic effects after manual therapy was found in different musculoskeletal conditions. However, the effectiveness of manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy hasn't been investigated yet. Therefore, the aim of study is to examine the short-term effect of manual therapy (mobilization) on the sensory features in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy.
This study will analyze injectate dispersal patterns after standard-of-care cervical epidural steroid injections using gadolinium as a marker and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize the pattern. Although these procedures are performed with high frequency under the assumption that injectate remains localized to injection site, no peer-reviewed studies have validated this assumption. Comprehensive characterization of injectate dispersal patterns will provide important data regarding safety, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic potential of cervical epidural steroid injections.
The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of soft tissue mobilization versus therapeutic ultrasound in subjects with neck and arm pain who demonstrate neural mechanical sensitivity.
At Saint-Antoine's hospital, in CETD a multidisciplinary team takes care of patients with chronic pain. Free-drug techniques are available to reduce their consumption of analgesics. This study is to assess the relief obtained by the simultaneous combination of these two techniques: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis.
The main objective of this study is to determine whether interventional treatment (i.e. epidural steroids), conservative therapy, or the combination, is superior for cervical radiculopathy. One hundred and sixty eight patients with radicular neck pain will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI), non-interventional management with physical therapy and medications, or a combination of the two. The first follow-up visit will be at 1-month. In patients who obtain some benefit but continue to report significant pain, either a 2nd CESI can be done, the patient's medications can be adjusted, or both in the combination group. Those patients who fail to obtain any benefit will exit the study to receive another treatment or alternative care. The second follow-up visit will be at 3-months. Similar to the 1-month follow-up, the doctor may elect to change nothing in patients who are satisfied, adjust medications, schedule the patient for another CESI, or do both in the combination group. Patients who fail to obtain any benefit can exit the study to receive alternative treatment. The final follow-up visit will be at 6 months.
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Preservon(TM) treated allograft bone dowels to traditional freeze-dried allograft bone dowels (control) for fusion of degenerated cervical intervertebral discs in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Patient follow-up will be conducted at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. At 3 months after surgery, the implanted bone dowels will be assessed for subsidence; at 6 months after surgery, the implanted bone dowels will be assessed for fusion. Patients will complete questionnaires and x-rays taken at each visit. The degree of subsidence and rate of fusion will be assessed based on the evaluation of the x-rays taken. The x-ray evaluation will be conducted by a neurosurgeon who is blinded to the type of treatment that each patient has received.