View clinical trials related to Cervical Cancer.
Filter by:The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the immuno-persistence (type specific IgG antibody) of the tested vaccine administered in girls aged 9-17 years,comparing to young healthy adults of 18-26 years who received the standard 3-dose schedule (0,1,6 months).
This trial is being done to find out whether tisotumab vedotin works better than chemotherapy to treat cervical cancer. People in this study have cervical cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) or has come back after being treated (recurrent). Participants in this trial will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will be treated with tisotumab vedotin. Participants in the other group will get one of five different chemotherapy drugs (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, pemetrexed, or irinotecan). Participants and their doctors will know which group they are in. Participants in the chemotherapy group will decide with their study doctor which drug they will take.
This is an open-label, 2-cohort, multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with or without ociperlimab (BGB-A1217) in participants with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
Context: In France, cervical cancer (CC) screening was opportunistic until recently. The target population includes women aged 25 to 65 years. About 66% of women aged 25-40 years have performed a screening test over the last three years but this figure decreases to 55% in women over 40. The third "Cancer Plan" proposed by the French National Institute for Cancer recommends to achieve an 80% participation in eligible women. Improving women compliance to CC screening is a major challenge to decrease cancer incidence and mortality. To improve patient adherence, a CC screening organization will be launched in 2020 at a national scale in France. Women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation letter from the local public health association in charge of cancer screening organization. The invitation letter will remind women that they should consult a healthcare professional (a general practitioner (GP), a gynecologist or a midwife) to perform a screening test. Providing GPs with a list of their non-adherent patients could also improve women compliance to CC screening recommendations. The study objective is to assess whether sending both an invitation letter to non-adherent women and a list of their non-adherent patients to GPs ("invitation letter + GP reminder" group) could increase the proportion of women who perform a screening test, compared to only sending an invitation letter to non-adherent women ("invitation letter" group) or not sending any invitation ("usual care" group).
The main purpose of the study is to describe changes in plasma HPV DNA levels in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer during radical radiochemotherapy (CRT) and to correlate changes with response to treatment. Monitoring of the response to treatment will also be assessed in FDG PET CT imaging.
The Self-Testing options in the Era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer (STEP) trial will evaluate effectiveness of home-based HPV kits for improving cervical cancer screening uptake and its cost-effectiveness. The investigators will compare cervical cancer screening uptake within six months among women randomized to different outreach approaches based on prior screening behavior: A) Adherent and coming due: direct mail HPV kit vs. opt-in HPV kit vs. education; B) Overdue: direct mail HPV kit vs. education; C) Unknown: opt-in HPV kit vs. education.
This is an open-label, multicenter, multiple-ascending dose, FIH, Phase 1 study of RTX-321 for the treatment of patients that are HLA-A*02:01 positive with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic, unresectable, HPV 16+ cancers.
Cervical cancer is the second-most common cancer in the world and is a leading cause of cancer death among women in developing countries. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab have been recommended as the first-line treatment for patients who present with metastatic (e.g. stage IVB), persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer. However, patients in this setting are rarely curable. Pembrolizumab has been approved for second-line treatment in patients with advanced PD-L1-positive cervical cancer. However, the response rate achieved by PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy is only modest. Preclinical studies found that in mouse models of B-cell lymphoma, adding a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor sensitized cancers to anti-PD-1 therapy. Recently, combination treatment of HDAC inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors is widely investigated and has promising results in several cancer types. Toripalimab is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody against PD-1. Chidamide is a class I HDAC inhibitor. Here we conducted a phase Ib/II, single-arm, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab in combination with chidamide in patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer.
In our published work, host DNA methylation testing has been proved to be sensitive and specific to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+). Its screening effects are independent of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) status. Based on the results of training and validation sets of our previous work, we perform this multicenter, prospective cohort study in unselected participants asking for cervical cancer screening in a hospital-based community. All eligible participants accept DNA methylation testing, with cytology and/or hrHPV assay. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation compared with cytology and/or hrHPV status based on histology results. The accuracy analysis includes sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the clinical benefit of cemiplimab + ISA101b after progression on first line chemotherapy, as assessed by objective response rate (ORR). The secondary objectives of the study are: - To characterize the safety profile of cemiplimab + ISA101b - To assess preliminary efficacy of cemiplimab + ISA101b as measured by duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)