Kinesio Taping Versus Oromotor Training on Drooling in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Cerebral Palsy Clinical Trial

Official title:

Kinesio Taping Versus Oromotor Training on Drooling in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05524831
• Other study ID #: P.T.REC/012/003677
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 12, 2021
• Est. completion date: August 11, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: September 2022
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Statement of the problem : Which is more effective for treatment of drooling in children with spastic cerebral palsy; kinesio taping or oromotor training? Null Hypothesis: There will be no difference between the effectiveness of kinesio taping and oromotor training on drooling in children with spastic cp.

Description:

Subjects: The Study targets the children with spastic cerebral palsy from both sexes , sample size estimation will be carried out to determine the recruited number of children ,Children participating in this study will be selected randomly from Cairo pediatric physical therapy centers to participate in this study. Study Design: A comparative experimental design (Prospective pre-test post-test design with 2 months follow-up evaluation) . Children will be assessed by measuring the drooling before and after two months of receiving intervention.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: August 11, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: February 26, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 4 Years to 8 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. A diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy with drooling problem.

2. The age of the selected children will range from 4to 8 years old.

3. Severe degree of drooling according to Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale.

4. Child with good head control

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Congenital problems of mouth and soft palate such as cleft lip and palate, jaw anomalies and salivary gland pathologies.

2. Epilepsy.

3. Child receiving drugs that could affect saliva production or other treatments to control drooling just before or during the study.

4. Allergic reactions to the kinesio tape.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cerebral Palsy
• Drooling
• Kinesiotape
• Sialorrhea

Intervention

Other:
• KINESIOTAPE
kinesiotape will be applied on orbicularis oris muscle
• oromotor training
selected oromotor training: Perioral sensory stimulation ,Tapping,Tongue pressure,Jaw exercises andIntraoral stimulation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Faculty of physical therapy ,cairo university	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	assessment of drooling severity	by using The 5-minute drooling quotient.it is expressed as a percentage of observed drooling episodes.	2 months for each participant
Primary	assessment of drooling severity and frequency	by using The Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale. at severity: score 1:no drool ,score5:profuse drooling. at frequency: score 1:never drool ,score4: constant drool	2months for each participant