Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

For a successful functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), it is crucial to provide effective controlled hypotension to reduce blood loss and provide a relatively blood-free surgical environment to facilitate surgery. The goal of controlled hypotension is to maintain an arterial blood pressure which is sufficiently low to allow a reduction in bleeding with offering a superior intraoperative hemodynamic stability during stressful surgical events to maintain intact cerebral microcirculatory auto-regulation. Auto-regulation impairment during controlled hypotension might increase oxygen extraction ratio. Thus monitoring the cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) to measure cerebral oxygenation becomes essential and it remains a challenge to clinically assess cerebral oxygenation on a routine basis. Various recent studies reported based on facilitating the induction of controlled hypotension, but the effects of hypotension on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation and its effects on postoperative cognitive function are still poorly characterized. Moreover, the relationship between rSO2 and controlled hypotension has not been established in patients undergoing FESS. Within the last decade, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) INVOS® monitors which is clinically most broadly spread technique, can be used for non-invasive assessment of cerebral perfusion by detecting changes in rSO2 by online monitoring of cerebral oxygenation. In our clinical routine for achieving a controlled hypotension, esmolol and remifentanyl are the most commonly used hypotensive agents. The aim of this prospective randomized single blind study was to investigate the influence of remifentanyl as a hypotensive agent in comparison to esmolol on rSO2 by using NIRS and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing FESS.


Clinical Trial Description

For a successful functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), it is crucial to provide effective controlled hypotension to reduce blood loss and provide a relatively blood-free surgical environment to facilitate surgery. The goal of controlled hypotension is to maintain an arterial blood pressure which is sufficiently low to allow a reduction in bleeding with offering a superior intraoperative hemodynamic stability during stressful surgical events to maintain intact cerebral microcirculatory auto-regulation. Auto-regulation impairment during controlled hypotension might increase oxygen extraction ratio. Thus monitoring the cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) to measure cerebral oxygenation becomes essential and it remains a challenge to clinically assess cerebral oxygenation on a routine basis. Various recent studies reported based on facilitating the induction of controlled hypotension, but the effects of hypotension on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation and its effects on postoperative cognitive function are still poorly characterized. Moreover, the relationship between rSO2 and controlled hypotension has not been established in patients undergoing FESS. Within the last decade, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitors which is clinically most broadly spread technique, can be used for non-invasive assessment of cerebral perfusion by detecting changes in rSO2 by online monitoring of cerebral oxygenation. In our clinical routine for achieving a controlled hypotension, esmolol and remifentanyl are the most commonly used hypotensive agents. The aim of this prospective randomized single blind study was to investigate the influence of remifentanyl as a hypotensive agent in comparison to esmolol on rSO2 by using NIRS and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing FESS. After receiving the local institutional research ethics committee approval and written informed consent from each patient, 140 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II patients aging between 18 and 65, undergoing for elective FESS and required controlled hypotension were enrolled in this study. Patients with hypertension, coronary artery diseases and cerebral insufficiency, severe hypovolemia and anemia, body mass index over 30 kg/m2, anticoagulation therapy and previous hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs were excluded from the study. They were equally randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil or esmolol to maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 55-65 mmHg. After insertion of a peripheral venous cannula upon arrival to the operating room, balanced electrolyte solution at 5 ml/kg/h was initiated. Following the premedication with intravenous midazolam 0.05 miligram/kg IV 15 min prior to the induction of anesthesia, and standard monitoring was applied consisting of electrocardiography (EKG), noninvasive blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2). Further, cerebral oxygen saturation value (rSO2, using the NIRS with adult probe placed in the median frontal region) was continuously monitored using NIRS before the induction of anesthesia. After preoxygenation anaesthesia was induced with 2 miligram/kg propofol, 2 μg/kg fentanyl and to facilitate the endotracheal intubation 0.6 miligram/kg rocuronium was administered. Following orotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation was adjusted to maintain PaCO2 at 35 to 40 mm Hg. Anaesthesia maintenance was performed using sevoflurane (0.8 to 1 adjusted MAC) in a mixture of O2/Nitrous oxide 50%/50%. Then the treatment protocol consisting of remifentanil and esmolol were delivered in order to induce controlled hypotension that was considered effective when MAP reached the target pressure of 60 mmHg. Patients in the esmolol group (Group E) received esmolol 0.5 miligram/kg iv at induction followed by a continuous infusion of esmolol 5-15 miligram/kg/min and titrated to the maximum dose 300μg/kg/min to reach target MAP of 50-60 mmHg about a value of 5 mmHg. Patients in the remifentanil group (Group R) received remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg/min at induction followed by an infusion of remifentanil 0.1- 0.5 μg/kg/min and titrated between 0,1- 0,5 μg/kg/min to reach target MAP of 50-60 mmHg about a value of 5 mmHg. In both groups no surgical stress was applied during 5 min following start of hypotension. Cerebral desaturation was defined as a reduction of rSO2 to higher than 20 % of baseline for ≥ 15 seconds. When cerebral desaturation occurred, remifentanil and esmolol infusion doses were decreased and MAP was increased with intravascular fluid administration and ephedrine. When hypotension below the target MAP and bradycardia below the heart rate 45 beats/min longer than one minute in duration were occurred, a bolus of ephedrine 10 mg iv and atropine 0.1 miligram/kg iv applied, respectively. All operations were performed by the same attending surgeon in order to ensure consistency in the estimation of the surgical field who was blinded to the hypotensive agent. When MAP reached the desired range (50-60 mmHg) and was maintained for at least 10 minutes, the quality of the surgical field was defined in terms of blood loss and dryness using a 10 point scale (0= no bleeding, virtually bloodless field; 10= uncontrolled bleeding). The cognitive function of the patients was assessed using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test. Preoperative MMSE test was done at the premedication room 1 hour before surgery and 120 minutes after the discontinuation of the drugs for each patient. A decrease in the MMSE score ≥ 2 points from baseline was considered as an index of decline in cognitive function. Hemodynamics (Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Mean blood pressure (MBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR), SPO2 and rSO2 were recorded preoperatively (baseline), postinduction 5th min (after administration of hypotensive and anesthetic agent), intraoperatively (10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes), 5 and 10 minutes after stoppage of hypotensive agents. Additionally, the duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, the consumption dose of hypotensive agents, desaturated and not desaturated patients among the groups were also recorded. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02967029
Study type Interventional
Source Istanbul University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date November 1, 2016
Completion date August 1, 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05970770 - Hypotension Prediction Index vs Norepinephrine Infusion for Prevention of Spinal Hypotension for Cesarean Delivery Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03626454 - Norepinephrine Addition in Spinal Anesthesia of Caesarean Section N/A
Completed NCT03834454 - Bupivacaine 5 mg vs 7.5 mg for Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery in Indonesian Population N/A
Recruiting NCT05661942 - Diltiazem in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter With Rapid Ventricular Rate Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05079269 - Pre-op Fluid Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06334549 - A Prospective Study of Vasopressor on Cerebral Oxygenation During General Anesthesia Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03478618 - Comparison of Different Protocols of Fluid Therapy in Severe Preeclamptic Patients Under Spinal Anesthesia Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT03465943 - Different Preloads for Prevention of Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Elective CS Under Intrathecal Anesthesia Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06259760 - AKI Risk Factors Analysis After Intentional Hypotensive Anesthesia
Completed NCT05143684 - Maternal Lateral Tilt and Cardiac Output in Caesarean Section
Recruiting NCT03743870 - Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Section
Completed NCT02979405 - Effectiveness of Phenylefrine in Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery Phase 4
Completed NCT05101291 - Fractional Spinal Anesthesia and Systemic Hemodynamics in Frail Elderly Hip Fracture Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT04914234 - Premedication With Atenolol Versus Metoprolol for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia During Nasal Surgeries Phase 4
Completed NCT05502146 - Comparison of Two Different Norepinephrine Bolus Doses for Management of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Maternal Hypotension Phase 4
Completed NCT05368376 - Is Labetalol More Effective Than Metoprolol for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia During Endoscopic Nasal Surgeries? Phase 4
Completed NCT04865614 - Comparison Between Inhalation and Intravenous Induction of Anaesthesia During Interventional Mitral Valve Repair