Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06109987 |
Other study ID # |
RTEUDHFMKARADAS002 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 11, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
September 17, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational [Patient Registry]
|
Clinical Trial Summary
High-viscosity glass ionomer cements have been developed to improve the weak mechanical
properties of glass ionomer cements, increase wear resistance and improve their limited
indications. There are limited clinical studies on the use of high-viscosity glass ionomer
cements in areas with large cavities bearing stress. The aim of this study is to compare the
clinical performance of two different high-viscosity glass ionomer cements with a bulk-fill
resin composite in different cavities.
Description:
This study was a double-blind (evaluator and patient) randomized controlled clinical study
with three study groups with an equal allocation. Three different restorative materials were
compared in Class I, II, and V restorations.
The treated patients were called back for controls after one week, six months, and eighteen
months. Restorations were evaluated clinically according to modified FDI criteria. In terms
of marginal discoloration, fracture and retention, marginal adaptation, post-operative
sensitivity, secondary caries, color match and difference criteria were examined.
Clinical evaluation was performed by one qualified clinicians using a mirror and probe under
reflector light. Bite-wing radiographs were taken from the patients who were called for
controls at 6-moth and 18-month to evaluate the formation of secondary caries.
Differences between adhesives at each time period were evaluated using Fisher's Exact test.
The effect of time on restorations was evaluated using Wilcoxon Signed rank test (p < 0.05).