Meta-analysis of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern and Cardiometabolic Risk

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effect of a Portfolio Dietary Pattern on Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03534414
• Other study ID #: DNSG-Portfolio diet
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Start date: January 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: May 2018
• Source: University of Toronto
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines have not made any specific recommendations regarding the Portfolio diet, a dietary pattern that includes nuts, viscous fibre, plant protein, and plant sterols. To update the recommendations, the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to summarize the available evidence from controlled trials of the effect of the Portfolio dietary pattern on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and other established cardiometabolic risk factors.

Description:

Background: The Portfolio Dietary Pattern, which includes nuts, viscous fiber, plant protein, and plant sterols, has been shown to have a cholesterol-lowering effect similar to that of early statin medications. Despite the endorsement of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern by major international diabetes and cardiovascular guidelines, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines for nutrition therapy have not made any specific recommendations for the Portfolio Dietary Pattern. The present systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was thus commissioned by the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD to summarize the available evidence from controlled trials of the effect of the Portfolio dietary pattern on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and other established cardiometabolic risk factors.

Need for proposed research: High quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled trials represent the highest level of evidence to support dietary guidelines and public health policy development. As dietary guidelines and public health policy have shifted toward food and dietary-pattern based recommendations, there is a need for a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the pooled effect of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern trials on cholesterol and cardiometabolic risk factors.

Objective: The investigators will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of a Portfolio Dietary Pattern compared to control on lipids and other cardiometabolic risk factors in controlled clinical trials.

Design: The systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched using appropriate search terms supplemented by hand searches of references of included studies. Authors will be contacted for applicable missing data.

Study selection: The investigators will include controlled dietary trials. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials will be included if they are >= 4 weeks duration and assess the effect of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern on cholesterol and cardiometabolic risk factors compared to a control diet.

Data extraction: Two or more investigators will independently extract relevant data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. All disagreements will be resolved by consensus. Standard computations and imputations will be used to derive missing variance data.

Outcomes: The primary outcome of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be the established lipid target for cardiovascular risk reduction, LDL-C. Secondary outcomes will include other blood lipids (total-C, triglycerides, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B (apo B)), adiposity (body weight), inflammation (C-reactive protein), blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP)), glycemic control (HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, fasting blood insulin), and the Framingham risk score for the estimation of 10 year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk.

Data synthesis: Mean differences and standardized mean differences will be pooled for the outcomes noted using the generic inverse variance method. Random-effects models will be used even in the absence of statistically significant between-study heterogeneity, as they yield more conservative summary effect estimates in the presence of residual heterogeneity. Fixed-effects models will be considered where there are <5 included studies and large precise trials are being combined with smaller imprecise trials. Paired analyses will be applied for crossover trials. Heterogeneity will be assessed by the Cochran Q statistic and quantified by the I2 statistic. To explore sources of heterogeneity, the investigators will conduct sensitivity analyses, in which each study is systematically removed. A sensitivity analysis will also be conducted comparing trials where food was provided with trials where participants received dietary advice, but not provided food. If there are >=10 studies, then the investigators will also explore sources of heterogeneity by a priori subgroup analyses by age (children [=<18 years of age], adults), health status (metabolic syndrome/diabetes, overweight, normal weight), comparator, baseline measurements, randomization, study design (parallel, crossover), follow-up (=<8-weeks, >8-weeks), and risk of bias. Meta-regression analyses will assess the significance of categorical and continuous subgroups analyses. When >=10 studies are available, publication bias will be investigated by inspection of funnel plots and formal testing using the Egger and Begg tests. If publication bias is suspected, then the investigators will attempt to adjust for funnel plot asymmetry by imputing the missing study data using the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method.

Evidence Assessment: The strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Knowledge translation plan: The results will be disseminated through interactive presentations at local, national, and international scientific meetings and publication in high impact factor journals. Target audiences will include the public health and scientific communities with interest in nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Feedback will be incorporated and used to improve the public health message and key areas for future research will be defined. Applicant/Co-applicant Decision Makers will network among opinion leaders to increase awareness and participate directly as committee members in the development of future guidelines.

Significance: The proposed project will aid in knowledge translation related to the role of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern in cholesterol-lowering and cardiometabolic risk, strengthening the evidence-base for guidelines and improving health outcomes by educating healthcare providers and patients, stimulating industry innovation, and guiding future research design.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 1
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: August 1, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Trials in humans

• Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

• Assessment of the portfolio dietary pattern in comparison to caloric- and macronutrient-matched diets that were not intended to provide components of the portfolio dietary pattern

• Diet duration = 4 week

• Viable outcome data with = 1 outcome of interest

Exclusion Criteria:

• Non-human trials

• Observational studies

• Lack of suitable comparator diet

• Diet duration <4 weeks

• No viable outcome data

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cardiovascular Risk Factor
• Cholesterol; Lipidosis

Intervention

Dietary Supplement:
• Portfolio Dietary Pattern
Portfolio Dietary Pattern consisting of 4 food components, including: plant sterols (sterol-enriched margarine or supplement) viscous soluble fibres (oats, barley, psyllium, eggplant, okra, etc) plant protein (soy products and pulses), and nuts (tree nuts and peanuts)
• NCEP Based Diet
A low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	The Toronto 3D (Diet, Digestive tract and Disease) Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Micheal's Hospital	Toronto	Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (5)

Jenkins DJ, Chiavaroli L, Wong JM, Kendall C, Lewis GF, Vidgen E, Connelly PW, Leiter LA, Josse RG, Lamarche B. Adding monounsaturated fatty acids to a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):1961-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092128. Epub 2010 Nov 1. — View Citation

Jenkins DJ, Jones PJ, Lamarche B, Kendall CW, Faulkner D, Cermakova L, Gigleux I, Ramprasath V, de Souza R, Ireland C, Patel D, Srichaikul K, Abdulnour S, Bashyam B, Collier C, Hoshizaki S, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW, Frohlich J. Effect of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods given at 2 levels of intensity of dietary advice on serum lipids in hyperlipidemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011 Aug 24;306(8):831-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1202. — View Citation

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Faulkner DA, Nguyen T, Kemp T, Marchie A, Wong JM, de Souza R, Emam A, Vidgen E, Trautwein EA, Lapsley KG, Holmes C, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW, Singer W. Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):582-91. — View Citation

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Marchie A, Faulkner D, Vidgen E, Lapsley KG, Trautwein EA, Parker TL, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW. The effect of combining plant sterols, soy protein, viscous fibers, and almonds in treating hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 2003 Nov;52(11):1478-83. — View Citation

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Marchie A, Faulkner DA, Wong JM, de Souza R, Emam A, Parker TL, Vidgen E, Lapsley KG, Trautwein EA, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW. Effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods vs lovastatin on serum lipids and C-reactive protein. JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):502-10. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Blood lipids - LDL-C		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood lipids - Total-C		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood lipids - HDL-C		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood lipids - non-HDL-C		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood lipids - triglycerides		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood lipids - Apolipoprotein B (apo B)		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Adiposity - body weight		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Inflammation - C-reactive protein		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood pressure - systolic blood pressure		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Blood pressure - diastolic blood pressure		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Glycemic control - fasting blood glucose		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Glycemic control - fasting blood insulin		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Glycemic control - HbA1c		Up to 20 years
Secondary	Coronary heart disease (CHD) risk	Change in estimated 10 year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk by the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), % (range, 0-100%)	Up to 10 years