View clinical trials related to Cardiogenic Shock.
Filter by:Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used as a rescue strategy for patients in acute hemodynamic deterioration such as cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary arrest with severe pulmonary congestion. VA ECMO is the fastest way to stabilize a patient with cardiogenic shock and improve end-organ perfusion. However, one of the major disadvantages of peripheral VA-ECMO is that it provides no left ventricular unloading and increases left ventricular (LV) afterload secondary to the retrograde blood flow. Therefore, LV wall tension and myocardial oxygen demand may actually increase in the setting of VA ECMO. The Impella® device is a miniature rotary blood pump which can be inserted retrograde across the aortic valve. In this configuration, it withdraws blood from the LV and ejects it into the ascending aorta. It unloads the left ventricle, reducing LV wall tension and myocardial oxygen demand and increasing myocardial blood flow. The Impella® 5.0 is an FDA approved pump designed for intermediate support in patients with severe, cardiogenic shock. The axillary positioning allows for early extubation and ambulation and is more stable than groin placement. In present practice, the decision to place an Impella® pump in VA-ECMO patients is based on the perceived need for direct LV unloading or when a bridge device is required to transition off ECMO support. Patients with peripheral VA ECMO are managed with inotropic agents at the beginning and once patients develop pulmonary edema mechanical LV unloading is considered electively. The advantage of LV unloading with Impella® has been demonstrated in recent studies. We also reported that concomitant implantation of Impella® with VA ECMO for LV unloading resulted in improved survival and recovery of ventricular performance in patients with cardiogenic shock. Compared to delayed elective LV unloading, early LV unloading could lead to decreased pulmonary edema, improved oxygenation delivery to the myocardium, increased chance of LV recovery and improved survival. The objective of this prospective study is to assess whether the early direct ventricular unloading using axillary Impella® leads to higher rates of cardiac recovery, defined as survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support at thirty days, compared with the conventional, elective placement of Impella® after developing significant pulmonary congestion.
Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is indicated as a haemodynamic rescue strategy in decompensated acute or chronic heart failure presenting as cardiogenic shock. It has been used across aeitologies including post-myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis and in post-cardiotomy shock. VA ECMO has a number of effects on the circulation including improved end-organ perfusion and possibly improved coronary perfusion, and is a bridge to further therapies including permanent advanced mechanical circulatory support, cardiac transplantation and to cardiac recovery. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide long-term mechanical circulatory support and also profoundly mechanically unload the left ventricle. Multiple clinical studies have documented cardiac recovery using LVAD therapy, with a rate between 10-60% in selected populations. A large body of basic science has documented the pivotal role of mechanical load in determining ventricular contractile performance across species. Therefore both clinical data and basic laboratory studies support the notion that profound ventricular unloading may result in improved cardiac performance through a variety of mechanisms ranging from triggered de novo cardiomyocyte proliferation, subcellular calcium handling reverse remodeling, changes to the extracellular matrix of the heart, reverse remodeling of the neurohormal milleu, amongst many others. One of the major deficiencies of peripheral VA-ECMO is its lack of left ventricular unloading, with associated pulmonary congestion, which can derail clinical improvement and hamper cardiac recovery. Indeed, percutaneous VA-ECMO increases LV afterload due to the retrograde blood flow, and because of the lack of venting, there may be progressive LV distension. These conditions can result in a congested, pressure-overloaded ventricle, even in the absence of echocardiographic ventricular distension. This may be ameliorated with the addition of ventricular mechanical unloading using percutaneous therapies including the percutaneous left ventricular device, Impella CP. On the platform of VA-ECMO, the addition of an Impella device to reduce ventricular loading results in improved survival and recovery of ventricular performance in the setting of cardiogenic shock. In a number of small studies, the use of additional means to unload the ventricle, principally Impella, results in cardiac recovery and less ventricular distension. In chronic heart failure, direct ventricular unloading is critical to cardiac recovery. The objective of this randomized study is to determine whether the addition of early direct ventricular unloading using Impella CP leads to higher rates of cardiac recovery, defined as survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support at thirty days. This study will also examine the clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic and radiologic effects of VA ECMO with and without the addition of Impella CP to directly vent the left ventricle to address adjunct important questions such as the effects on pulmonary congestion.
The purpose of this study is to gather information on patients who have heart failure and are eligible for one of the following two procedures: 1) mechanical support, i.e. ventricular assist device (VAD) or 2) heart transplant. the study seeks to determine which patient populations benefit from heart transplant or ventricular assist device. This will allow to offer the state-of-the-art care to the patients in heart failure.
The primary objective of this study is to assess reasonable safety and performance of the HeartMate PHP to provide hemodynamic support for up to 72 hours in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring stabilization.