Cardiac Output, Low Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Observational Study Comparing NICOM-Cheetah Versus Flotrac-Vigileo for Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
Verified date | May 2021 |
Source | Changi General Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
Cardiac output (CO) monitoring is an important tool in critically ill patients with haemodynamic instability. Traditionally, this has been accomplished using the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). However, its use has been associated with various complications such as pneumothorax, arrhythmia, infection, pulmonary valve injury and embolism. This has led to the development of various minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring devices such as the oesophageal Doppler, PiCCO®, NiCCO® and FloTrac®. These devices however have their inherent limitations and though minimally invasive, are still not without risks to the patient. More recently a completely non-invasive CO monitoring device, NICOM Cheetah® has been introduced. Its use is based on thoracic bioreactance and it involves placement of 4 electrodes on either side of the thorax and it analyses changes in the phase of electrical voltage signal to the current applied across the thorax. Initial validation studies on the NICOM Cheetah® device revealed promising results. This study intends to compare cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® device using the FloTrac® CO monitor as a reference.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 26 |
Est. completion date | January 5, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | January 5, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 21 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring. - Patients 21 years old and above - American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1 to 4 Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who are not on mechanical ventilation. - Patients who are not in sinus rhythm. - Patients with allergy to adhesive tapes |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Singapore | Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Changi General Hospital | Singapore |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Changi General Hospital |
Singapore,
Marqué S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R73. doi: 10.1186/cc7884. Epub 2009 May 19. — View Citation
Mehta Y, Arora D. Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring. World J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 26;6(9):1022-9. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.1022. Review. — View Citation
Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008 Apr;22(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5. Epub 2008 Mar 14. — View Citation
Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1191-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0640-0. Epub 2007 Apr 26. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Degree of Disagreement, % | Comparison of cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® versus the FloTrac®. Cardiac output defined as the amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. Bland-Altman analysis used to compare the level of disagreement between the 2 devices, %. | 10 hours of data collected for each participant |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05070819 -
Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Assessing Fluid Status
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05492968 -
The Effect of Epinephrine, Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Performance
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03444545 -
Continous Cardiac Output - Non-Invasive Evaluation (CONNIE)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04064177 -
Non-invasive Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring in Preterm Infants Study
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03058653 -
Use of a Mini-fluid Bolus to Identify Fluid Responsiveness
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02880683 -
Cardiac Output Autonomic Stimulation Therapy for Heart Failure (COAST-HF) - Human NeuroCatheter Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00989508 -
Myocardial Protection With Perhexiline in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04955184 -
Comparing Cardiac Output Measurements Using a Wearable, Wireless, Non-invasive PPG-Based Device to a Swan Ganz Catheter
|
||
Completed |
NCT02964663 -
Comparison of the Ability of the esCCO and the Volume View to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04641949 -
Methoxyflurane and Fentanyl in LBNP
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04191408 -
Predictive Ability of PEEP Induced Changes in CVP to Predict Volume Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01892696 -
Effects of Inspiratory Flow Waveforms on Preload
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02728791 -
Comparison of Allows Measurement of Cardiac Output Between Clearsight System and Transpulmonary Thermodilution
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03930979 -
The Effect of Hyperoxia on Cardiac Output
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04755764 -
Effect of Labetalol, Atenolol, and Nifedipine on Maternal Hemodynamics Measured by ICG in Early Pregnancy
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02702544 -
Effect of Passive Leg Raising for Fluid Responsiveness
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01880684 -
Validation of Capnography as a Predictor of Cardiac Output Change as Measured by FloTrac
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05035719 -
Comparison Studies Comparing Hemodynamic Parameters Provided by the Caretaker Against Respective Gold Standard References
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04774978 -
Real-time Continuous Cardiac Output Measurements
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02485782 -
Changes in Volumetric Hemodynamic Parameters Induced by Fluid Removal on Hemodialysis
|
N/A |