Evaluation of Efficacy of the Prototype RPC (Rapid Pulse Confirmation)

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Effective chest compressions are essential to survival in an arrest patient receiving CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). A challenge in providing effective chest compressions is frequent interruption of compressions. A major cause of a recurrent interruption of chest compressions is pulse checks. Pulse checks are difficult to quickly and accurately perform in the AHA recommended time interval of under 10 seconds for reasons ranging from inexperience to body habitus. Unnecessarily long pulse checks often delay reinitiating chest compressions leading to a fall in perfusion pressure to the coronary arteries lowering the chances of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). To potentially solve the issues of evaluating the chest compression effectiveness and minimize the time interval of pulse checks, the authors have constructed a novel device that can be rapidly applied to an arresting patient and evaluate the current state of the circulatory system. The device is called the Rapid Pulse Confirmation (RPC) device. It is designed to applied over a major artery (radial, ulnar, brachial, carotid, and femoral) and detect Doppler shift of red blood cells to gauge red blood cell velocity and rate of pulsation. Feasibility testing on the device was carried out using patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Arrest and return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary bypass is predictable and provided an ideal environment to test the initial performance of a device meant to detect return of spontaneous circulation. The primary working hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in time of detection of ROSC between the arterial line catheter and the RPC device at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. The secondary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in pulse rate reading between the arterial line catheter and the RPC device.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04526249
Study type	Observational
Source	West Virginia University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	October 17, 2017
Completion date	January 20, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT06048068` - Removing Surrogates' Uncertainty to Reduce Fear and Anxiety After Cardiac Events	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05558228` - Accuracy of Doppler Ultrasound Versus Manual Palpation of Pulse in Cardiac Arrest
Completed	`NCT03685383` - Cytokine Adsorption in Post-cardiac Arrest Syndrome in Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation	N/A
Completed	`NCT04619498` - Effectiveness of an Interactive Cognitive Support Tablet App to Improve the Management of Pediatric Cardiac Arrest	N/A
Completed	`NCT04584645` - A Digital Flu Intervention for People With Cardiovascular Conditions	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05649891` - Checklists Resuscitation Emergency Department	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT02352350` - Lactate in Cardiac Arrest	N/A
Completed	`NCT03024021` - Cerebral Oxymetry and Neurological Outcome in Therapeutic Hypothermia
Completed	`NCT02275234` - Care After Resuscitation
Completed	`NCT02247947` - Proteomics to Identify Prognostic Markers After CPR and to Estimate Neurological Outcome
Completed	`NCT01972087` - Simulation Training to Improve 911 Dispatcher Identification of Cardiac Arrest	N/A
Completed	`NCT01944605` - Intestinal Ischemia as a Stimulus for Systemic Inflammatory Response After Cardiac Arrest	N/A
Completed	`NCT01936597` - Prospective Study of 3 Phone Assistance Strategies to Achieve a Continuous Cardiac Massage	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01239420` - Norwegian Cardio-Respiratory Arrest Study
Completed	`NCT01191736` - Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice	N/A
Completed	`NCT00880087` - Therapeutic Hypothermia to Improve Survival After Cardiac Arrest in Pediatric Patients-THAPCA-IH [In Hospital] Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT00878644` - Therapeutic Hypothermia to Improve Survival After Cardiac Arrest in Pediatric Patients-THAPCA-OH [Out of Hospital] Trial	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00729794` - Vasopressin, Epinephrine, and Steroids for Cardiac Arrest	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT00441753` - Cerebral Bloodflow and Carbondioxide Reactivity During Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia in Patients After Cardiac Arrest	N/A
Completed	`NCT00347477` - Fluid Shifts in Patients Treated With Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest	Phase 3

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Evaluation of Efficacy of the Prototype RPC (Rapid Pulse Confirmation) Device in Detecting Return of Pulsatile Flow in Patients Preparing to Separate From CPB (Cardiopulmonary Bypass)

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms