Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trial

Official title:

Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression: A Retrospective Study in In-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04422938
• Other study ID #: medybu-IN
• Status: Completed
• Start date: January 1, 2016
• Est. completion date: March 31, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: June 2020
• Source: Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Description:

In this study, the investigators analyzed cardiopulmonary resuscitations performed over a 2-year period in an emergency department of a training and research hospital and compared success of manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge. Investigators present the study as an in-hospital cardiac arrest study; however, all of the resuscitation performed in the cases included in the study were performed in the emergency department.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 303
• Est. completion date: March 31, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department

Exclusion Criteria:

<18 age

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cardiac Arrest
• Heart Arrest
• Resuscitation

Intervention

Other:
• Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians
Compressions will be handled by human efforts

Device:
• LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System
LUCAS-2 model piston-based mechanical chest compression device was used for mechanical chest compressions

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Turkey	Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine	Ankara	Çankaya

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent	Ankara Training and Research Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (2)

Couper K, Quinn T, Lall R, Devrell A, Orriss B, Seers K, Yeung J, Perkins GD; COMPRESS-RCT collaborators. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 30;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6. — View Citation

Couper K, Yeung J, Nicholson T, Quinn T, Lall R, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression devices at in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun;103:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 11. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mortality rate on the 30th day	Mortality rates from the hospital admission to the 30th day	30 days
Primary	Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation	Rate of return of the spontaneous circulation with duration at least five minutes	5 minutes