View clinical trials related to Carcinoma.
Filter by:The purpose of study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of sequential immunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer
This is a single-arm, monocentric, phase II trial, enrolling patients with histological diagnosis of collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma with locally advanced or metastatic disease who will be treated with Pembrolizumab plus Enfortumab Vedotin. Approximately, 23 patients will be enrolled. At screening, pre-existing archival primary and metastatic FFPE tumor specimen will be collected and submitted for central pathology review and translational analysis. All participants will undergo baseline screening imaging for clinical staging. Patients will be treated with Pembrolizumab q21 plus Enfortumab Vedotin 1,8q21 for 3 cycles (3 infusion of Pembrolizumab and 6 infusion of Enfortumab Vedotin) then radiological imaging will be repeated and patients with SD, PR or CR will continue pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities or completion of treatment (17 cycles). Patients with progressive disease after 3 cycles of study intervention will be treated as per clinical practice. Patients who will experience progressive disease during pembrolizumab monotherapy treatment could restart Enfortumab Vedotin. The study will also involve collection of a blood sample taken at the commencement of treatment, at the first cycle, after cycle 3 and at the end of treatment or progression of disease, to be used for research purposes.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the safety and effectiveness of a medical device called 166-Holmium microspheres (QuiremSpheres®) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) . The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the safety and toxicity profile of the 166-Holmium microspheres? - Is the device effective in treating HCC? Participants will undergo a range of screening procedures to confirm they are eligible and to record their baseline results, including: - A Computed Tomography (CT) scan - A Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan - Blood tests - Quality of life questionnaires Before receiving treatment with QuiremSpheres® the participant will receive a 'scout' dose of the microspheres, to check whether there is distribution of the radioactivity to other non-target areas of the body. This is measured using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-CT imaging. If the distribution to non-target areas is deemed to not be too high, the participant will go on to receive the individualised therapeutic dose of QuiremSpheres®. Follow-up visits will occur 3 and 6 weeks post-treatment dose, and then at 3 and 6 months.
Thymic epithelial tumors are rare neoplasms in the anterior mediastinum. The cornerstone of the treatment is surgical resection. Administration of postoperative radiotherapy is usually indicated in patients with more extensive local disease, incomplete resection and/or more aggressive subtypes, defined by the WHO histopathological classification. In this classification thymoma types A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and thymic carcinoma are distinguished. Studies have shown large discordances between pathologists in subtyping these tumors. Moreover, the WHO classification alone does not accurately predict the risk of recurrence, as within subtypes patients have divergent prognoses. The investigators will develop AI models using digital pathology and relevant clinical variables to improve the accuracy of histopathological classification of thymic epithelial tumors, and to better predict the risk of recurrence. In this multicentric and international project three existing databases will be used from Rotterdam, Maastricht and Lyon. For all models one database will be used to build AI models, and the other two for external validation. The ultimate goal of this project is to develop AI models that support the pathologist in correctly subtyping thymic epithelial tumors, in order to prevent patients from under- or overtreatment with adjuvant radiotherapy.
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adding rituximab after failure of target immunotherapy in the Posterior treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
The NCCN guidelines recommend induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy as the standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, meta-analyses have shown significant survival differences between different induction chemotherapy regimens. How to choose an induction chemotherapy regimen and treatment course that ensures definitive therapeutic effects and low incidence of toxic side effects remains a hot spot in clinical research. Polymeric micellar paclitaxel are an innovative form of paclitaxel drugs, with high penetration and long retention effects, which can enter the vascularly disordered tumor microenvironment through passive targeting and form higher concentrations in tumor tissue. It remains to be investigated whether the TPC (paclitaxel, cisplatin and capecitabine) regimen based on polymeric micellar paclitaxel compared to the current standard first-line induction chemotherapy GP (gemcitabine, cisplatin) regimen can further improve therapeutic effects in high-risk patients with locally advanced disease. There is still a lack of head-to-head studies for comparison. This study aims to compare, through a prospective, parallel-controlled, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial, the TPC induction chemotherapy vs. the GP induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of high-risk locoregionally advanced NPC (T4 or N2-3) in terms of 2-year progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, toxic side effects, etc.
This is a first-in-human, open-label, multi-center, Phase 1, dose-escalation study with expansion cohorts to evaluate NM32-2668 for safety and immunogenicity, to determine the maximal tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose, define the pharmacokinetics, to explore the pharmacodynamics, and to obtain preliminary evidence of the clinical activity in adult patients with selected advanced solid tumors.
The aim of this study was to analyse the independent risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy after liver resection surgery, and to develop a prognostic model based on these factors.
This study is being done to investigate clonal hematopoiesis and therapy-emergent myeloid neoplasms in patients with ovarian cancers. Researchers want to identify risk factors for developing these blood cancers as well as if there is/are a genetic/environmental component(s) to developing blood cancer.
This is a two-part (Phase 2/Phase 3) study of V940, an individualized neoantigen therapy (INT), plus pembrolizumab in participants with locally resectable advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (LA cSCC). Phase 2 has three arms V940 plus pembrolizumab given as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment with standard of care (SOC), standard of care (surgical resection with/without adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) only at investigator's discretion) and pembrolizumab monotherapy given as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment with SOC. This phase will assess the safety and efficacy of V940 in combination with pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in participants with resectable LA cSCC as compared to standard of care SOC only. The primary hypothesis is that V940 plus pembrolizumab with SOC is superior to SOC only with respect to event free survival (EFS) as assessed by the investigator. Phase 3 expansion will be determined by prespecified Go-No-Go decision in which 412 additional participants will be randomized to V940 plus pembrolizumab with SOC and SOC only, without changing the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the additional enrollment or study endpoints.