Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The incidence of LM in NSCLC patients is around 3-5 %, reaching 9.4 % of those with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Generally, the efficacy of systemic treatment for LM is limited due to the blood-brain barrier. Osimertinib has a high central nervous system penetration rate, making it the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Previous studies indicated that osimertinib had shown promising efficacy in pretreated patients harboring EGFR mutations and LM. However, intracranial disease progression eventually develops, and the prognosis of patients with LM progression after osimertinib is poor. Recently, intrathecal chemotherapy with pemetrexed (IP) was reported to be an alternative treatment in patients with NSCLC and LM. The results from a phase I/II trial examining the efficacy and safety of IP in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after the failure of previous TKI, and 83% of study enrollees received osimertinib before IP. The clinical response rate was 84.6%, and the median overall survival was 9.0 months. Despite initial promising efficacy, further trials are needed to verify these results. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective study to examine the safety and effectiveness of IP combined with EGFR-TKI for patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC after osimertinib failure.


Clinical Trial Description

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The incidence of LMC in NSCLC patients is around 3-5 %, and reaches 9.4 % of those with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Although EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) had markedly prolonged survival in advanced NSCLC patients, the prognosis of patients with LMC remains poor. In a Taiwanese NSCLC cohort, the median survival of patients after diagnosis of LMC was 4.5 months. The diagnosis of LM is difficult, and depends on clinical, CSF, and radiographic findings. A positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of LM, but the sensitivity of initial lumbar puncture has been reported to be as low as 50%. A gadolinium-enhanced MRI of brain and spine is the best imaging technique for the diagnosis of LM. In patients with metastatic NSCLC and typical presentations of LM, the typical abnormal enhancement on MRI alone can lead to the diagnosis of LMC. However, 20-30% of patients with LM have a normal or false negative MRI. The current diagnostic algorism is based on EANO-ESMO guideline including clinical findings, neuroimaging features and CSF analysis. The management of LM in patients with NSCLC remained questioned. The aim of treatment is palliative, including amelioration of neurological symptoms, improvement of quality of life, and prolongation of survival. Generally, the efficacy of systemic treatment is limited due to blood-brain barrier. A retrospective study suggests that patients who received contemporary systemic treatment had a decreased risk of death compared to those who did not receive modern systemic therapy. The role of local radiotherapy, in the other hand, is to ease symptoms, to reduce bulky or nodular disease, and to correct CSF flow. There is no consensus on whether whole-brain radiotherapy is a beneficial treatment for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from NSCLC. Other managements includes intrathecal chemotherapy, CSF diversion surgery, immunotherapy and palliative care. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI targeting both EGFR sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations, prolonged survival in patients with NSCLC with T790M mutation after EGFR-TKI failure. Compared with other EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib has a high central nervous system (CNS) penetration rate, making it the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Previous studies indicated that osimertinib had shown promising efficacy in pretreated patients with EGFR T790M mutation and LM. However, intracranial disease progression eventually develops and the prognosis of patients with LM progression after osimertinib is poor, with a median survival of 7.2 months. Dose intensification of osimertinib to 160 mg per day is a treatment option in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC and LM after osimertinib failure. In a phase II study by Park et al., patients with T790M-positive NSCLC with brain metastasis and LM were treated with osimertinib 160 mg. Their median PFS and OS were 8.0 and 13.3 months, respectively. A total of 42 percent of patients in the LM cohort received prior T790M targeted agents (osimertinib: 12.5%), and the intracranial disease control rate was 88.2%. In the LM cohort, PFS was not significantly different between patients who had received prior T790M targeted agents and those who did not. In a retrospective study in United States, the median duration of CNS control in patients who received high dose osimertinib was 6.0 months in isolated leptomeningeal progression. The most common adverse events were decreased appetite, diarrhea, and skin rash; however, most were mild in the previous study. More treatment options were needed in this group of patients. Pemetrexed in a standard chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC and showed efficacy in patients with symptomatic brain metastasis. Recently, intrathecal chemotherapy with pemetrexed was reported to be an alternative treatment in patients with NSCLC and LM. In a pilot phase 1 study in China, Pan et al. enrolled thirteen patients and found that maximally tolerated dose of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) was 10 mg. Severe adverse events were noted in 31% (4/13) of the cases, including myelosuppression, radiculitis, and elevation of hepatic aminotransferases. Another case report also showed a good treatment response to IP (30mg) via Ommaya reservoir in a patient with EGFR mutant NSCLC and LM. Furthermore, Fan et al. published the results from a phase I/II trial examining the efficacy and safety of IP in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC after failure of previous TKI, and 83% of study enrollees received osimertinib before intrathecal pemetrexed. The clinical response rate was 84.6% and the median overall survival was 9.0 months. The recommended dose of IP was 50 mg with few adverse effects. Despite initial promising efficacy, further trials are need to verify the results. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a prosepctive study to exam the safety and efficacy of IP combined with EGFR-TKI for patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC after osimertinib failure. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05805631
Study type Interventional
Source Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Contact Chi-Lu Chiang, MD
Phone 886228712121
Email clchiang@vghtpe.gov.tw
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 2
Start date May 1, 2023
Completion date May 1, 2025

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04879849 - A Study of TAK-676 With Pembrolizumab After Radiation Therapy to Treat a Number of Cancers Phase 1
Completed NCT04426825 - A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With EGFR Mutation Positive Stage IIIB-IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT03166631 - A Trial to Find the Safe Dose for BI 891065 Alone and in Combination With BI 754091 in Patients With Incurable Tumours or Tumours That Have Spread Phase 1
Completed NCT02864394 - Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Participants Previously Treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-033/KEYNOTE-033) Phase 3
Completed NCT02810457 - Evaluation of FKB238 and Avastin in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04592523 - A Study of Usage of Brigatinib in the Treatment of Adult Participants for Approved Indications In South Korea
Recruiting NCT04838548 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MRG003 in Patients With EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04077463 - A Study of Lazertinib as Monotherapy or in Combination With Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04603807 - A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib and Crizotinib in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic ROS1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With and Without Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05167604 - Clinical Value of MRD Monitoring for Adjuvant Therapy in Postoperative NSCLC
Completed NCT04948411 - Durvalumab as Maintenance in Patients Who Received Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: Real World Data From an Expanded Access Program in Brazil
Active, not recruiting NCT04487080 - A Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib Combination Therapy Versus Osimertinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT04255836 - Durvalumab Combined With Chemotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Patients With Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Phase 2
Completed NCT01953913 - Afatinib (BIBW 2992) in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05715229 - Immune Profile Selection By Fraction of ctDNA in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Treated With Immunotherapy Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04931654 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Suspended NCT05421936 - Osimertinib for NSCLC With Uncommon EGFR Mutations
Completed NCT02847377 - A Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging Agent [18F]-ODS2004436 as a Marker of EGFR Mutation in Subjects With NSCLC N/A
Completed NCT04427072 - Study of Capmatinib Efficacy in Comparison With Docetaxel in Previously Treated Participants With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04823377 - Impact of a Process Optimizing the Decision to Continue or Stop Cancer Treatments in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. N/A