View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.
Filter by:Actual indications for stage Ia NSCLC patients suggest lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. On the other hand, recent studies reported non-inferiority of segmentectomy in case of nodule < 2cm or with ground glass appearance at computed tomography. However, most of these studies did not report specifical analysis on kind of segmentectomy (single or multiple) and kind of lobectomy. Moreover, a specific study on solid nodules only is still missing. For these reasons, the effectiveness of segmentectomy instead lobectomy for every kind of segment or tumor is still to be defined. Aim of this study is to analyze survival outcome in patients underwent single or multiple segmentectomy compared to lobectomy in stage I non small cell lung cancer.
The purpose of this study is to identify the recommended dose of vudalimab to be used in combination with chemotherapy (Part 1) and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vudalimab plus standard of care chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (Part 2) as first-line treatment in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
The primary objective of the study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan combined with pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypothesis is that the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab alone with respect to OS. All participants who have completed the first course of pembrolizumab may be eligible for up to an additional 9 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy if there is blinded independent central review (BICR)-verified progressive disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) after initial treatment.
The purpose of this observational study is to collect and evaluate real-world data to assess the effectiveness of neoadjuvant nivolumab when given in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in participants with early-stage, resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Germany
This is an observational study, aiming to investigate whether the ctDNA dynamics analyzed by the K-TrackTM assay could predict early response to Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 1. Determine relationship between ctDNA dynamics and clinical response to TKI, - No response/progressive disease = ctDNA levels increase from baseline - Partial response/stable disease = ctDNA levels decrease from baseline - Complete response = ctDNA clearance. 2. Compare and combine ctDNA dynamics and RECIST1.1 to predict clinical response. 3. Determine relationship between ctDNA dynamics and progression free survival, overall survival.
The aim of this study was to establish and optimize the imaging method of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102, as well as its physiological and pathological distribution characteristics, on the basis of which the diagnostic efficacy of the above imaging agent was evaluated in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Europe. Pathological staging is the gold standard, but it can be influenced by neo-adjuvant treatment and number of sampled lymph nodes; it is not feasible in advanced stages and in patients with high-risk comorbidities. Therefore, patients with tumors of the same stage can experience variations in the incidence of recurrence and survival since suboptimal staging leads to inappropriate treatment that result in poorer outcomes. It is still undetermined what are the tumor characteristics that can accurately assess tumor burden and predict patient outcome.Our central hypothesis is that image-derived and genetic characteristics are consistent with disease stage and patient outcome. Combining through artificial intelligence techniques data coming from imaging and circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) can provide accurate staging and predict outcome. This hypothesis has been formulated based on preliminary data and on the evidence that image-derived biomarkers by means of image mining (radiomics and deep learning algorithms) are able to provide "phenotype" and prognostic information. On the other hand, the analysis of ctDNA isolated from the plasma of patients has been proposed as an alternative method to assess the disease in the different phases, in particular, at diagnosis and after surgery, for detection of residual disease.
This is a Phase 1b/2 study evaluating the anti-PD1 antibody, cemiplimab, in combination with either S095018 (anti-TIM3 antibody), S095024 (anti-CD73 antibody), or S095029 (anti-NKG2A antibody) in adult participants with previously untreated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high PD-L1 expression. The study includes two parts: part A, the combination-therapy safety lead-in phase to determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for S095018, S095024, and S095029 in combination with cemiplimab and part B, the randomized dose expansion phase to assess the efficacy of S095018, S095024, or S095029 in combination with cemiplimab. Study treatment will be administered for a maximum of 108 weeks, or until confirmed disease progression per iRECIST and/ or until meeting other treatment discontinuation criteria.
The purpose of this platform study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of novel RAS(ON) inhibitors combined with Standard(s) of Care (SOC) or with each other. The first two subprotocols include the following: Subprotocol A: RMC-6291 + SOC Subprotocol B: RMC-6236 + SOC
The goal of this observational study is to learn about in invasive non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent pulmonary resection with systematic lymph node dissection from April 2008 to July 2022 . The main question it aims to answer are: determine the situation of zero risk mediastinal lymph metastases and the different lymph node metastatic patterns of tumors with different characteristics. Participants will provide personal information to analyze. and there is not a comparison group.