View clinical trials related to Cancer of Colon.
Filter by:the 3-year randomized controlled RCT-SE study aims to investigate Socio-aesthetics well being care on quality of life, pain and anxiety. The primary objective is to show that socio-aesthetics well being care improves quality of life during cancer treatment, compared to self care administration of dermo-cosmetics products The secondary objectives are to show that socio-aesthetics well being care significantly reduced anxiety and pain compared to self care administration of dermo-cosmetics products
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols were developed to standardize perioperative practice in colon surgery to reduce morbidity, improve recovery, and shorten length of stay (LOS). Better protocol adherence translates into fewer readmissions and complications, and better 5-year survival. Preoperative elements, especially nutrition and immunonutrition, are topics that need further development to become the standard of care. It has been widely reported that the prevalence of malnutrition reaches 40% in cancer patients at the time of diagnosis. Impaired nutritional status at the time of surgery and cancer-induced inflammation, along with postoperative inflammatory responses to major surgery, increase the risk of postoperative complications, along with a decrease in perceived quality of life. Immunonutrition can modulate inflammation and reduce postoperative infections and shorten length of stay by counteracting the immune response induced by cancer. Adipose tissue has been shown to be a relevant source of inflammatory mediators, which may play a role in the promotion of tumor cachexia. The present study is a multicenter randomized control study (RCT) designed to evaluate the effect of preoperative immunonutrition in patients with colorectal cancer eligible for elective minimally invasive procedures, evaluating in particular surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. A biopsy of subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue will also be performed, in order to evaluate the differences between inflammatory infiltrate, degree of fibrosis and cross-sectional area of adipocytes compared to controls.
1. Assessment of correlation between tumor deposits and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer. 2. Detection of association between tumor deposits and stage of colorectal cancer. 3. Evaluate the relationship between tumor deposits and prognosis of colorectal cancer patient.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 3rd most common cancer worldwide. In the UK, CRC is the 4th most common cancer accounting for 12% of cancers diagnosed each year with approximately 41,300 new cases diagnosed in 2014. Surgery remains the only treatment option that can reliably achieve cure from colorectal cancer and thus nearly 20,000 major bowel resections are performed for this yearly in the UK. Surgery for these cancers however carries risk of major complications and potentially death. Selecting appropriate patients for surgery remains a challenge to cancer teams. Risk factors exist for complications after surgery for CRC, many of which can be assessed and discussed with the patient prior to surgery, so that any decision to operate is with fully informed consent from the patient. Increasing attention is being paid to a patient's frailty or fitness as one of these risk factors. Our centre has previously shown that measuring the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle (a large muscle near the spine) from preoperative imaging could predict major complications in colorectal cancer patients (Jones 2015), however specialist software and patient height is required to make this calculation. More recently we have demonstrated that the measurement of the psoas muscle density on preoperative imaging (i.e. routine CT scans that all patients have before surgery to plan treatment), may potentially be useful to predict which patients are at most risk of a major complication (Herrod 2019). If this finding holds true when tested on a larger scale, it could be used to help surgical teams make the decision on whether to offer surgical resection, what kind of operations to perform, how to best support individuals undergoing operation and to ensure that the patient has the most information available to decide what risk they are at by having major surgery.
Mindsets are lenses or frames of mind that orient individuals to a particular set of expectations and associations. This study aims to leverage specific and empirically supported mindsets (i.e., 'cancer is manageable' and 'the body is capable') to reduce distress and improve physical health and psychological wellbeing in patients with cancer being treated with curative intent. This intervention will take the form of several brief documentary style film segments which feature both cancer survivors and experts in the fields of Oncology, Psychology, and Psychiatry. Although no mindset-targeted interventions have been studied in cancer patients to date, other psychosocial interventions have demonstrated efficacy in treating emotional distress and improving quality of life in this population. However, compared with these standard interventions, mindset interventions need not be lengthy, complex, or costly to yield major effects. Thus, this project aims to lay the groundwork for future scalable and efficient interventions that can meaningfully reduce distress and improve health and wellbeing in this population.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy of BRCX014 Combined with Standard-Of-Care Treatment in Subjects with Glioblastoma Multiforme, Multiple Myeloma, and GI Malignancies