View clinical trials related to Cancer, Lung.
Filter by:Patients often base their information on the experiences of other patients or on information they find on the internet. This information is in many cases incorrect, outdated or not applying to the patient's situation. This leads to misconceptions or inappropriate anxiety. During the intake consultation at the radiotherapy department, doctors, nurses and RTTs provide accurate and patient-specific information, but it can be overwhelming and it is known that only part of this information is remembered. Moreover, it remains difficult for a patient to imagine how the treatment will proceed. The combination of verbal information, supplemented with video material, seems to be the ideal way to convey information. After all, a video can be viewed again afterwards, possibly together with loved ones, or can be shown in advance in preparation of the consultation. In Belgium, the existence of patient education videos about radiotherapy is very limited. Making these kinds of videos is expensive and time consuming. For that reason, BeSTRO (Belgian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology) started a project to make videos for patients that can be used nationally by all radiotherapy centers. The project is sponsored by Foundation against Cancer.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy oral nutrition supplement (ONS) in malnutrition/high risk malnutrition cancer patients. The main questions it aims to answer: 1. Are there differences in knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores in cancer patients who receive cancer-specific ONS compared to those who do not receive cancer-specific ONS? 2. Is there a difference in nutritional status as assessed by average body weight, body mass index (BMI), haemoglobin (Hb), and albumin levels in cancer patients who receive cancer-specific ONS compared to those who do not receive cancer-specific ONS?
The goal of this clinical trial is to test CPO301, a type of drug called an antibody drug conjugate in adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To assess the safety and tolerability of CPO301 at increasing doses and determine the dose to be used in the second part of the study (Part A) - To assess the safety and tolerability of CPO301 at the dose determined to be safe and tolerable in Part A in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and potentially other tumor types (Part B) - To evaluate how quickly CPO301 is metabolized by the body (pharmacokinetics or PK) - To evaluate if antibodies to the study drug develop (immunogenicity) - To evaluate preliminary efficacy to the drug - To correlate preliminary efficacy with mutations in a biomarker called EGFR Participants will: - Provide written informed consent - Undergo screening tests to ensure they are eligible for study treatment - Attend all required study visits and receive CPO301 by intravenous injection every 3 weeks until the study doctor determines study treatment should be stopped, based on how well a participant is doing on treatment - Be followed for progression every 3 months for up to 2 years
The primary objective of this phase I study is to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CBP-1019, a bi-specific ligand conjugated drugs in patients with advanced solid tumors.
A single-arm, multicentre trial to investigate sotorasib in KRASG12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer stage III/IV not amenable for curative treatment including patients with comorbidities, and to provide translational knowledge regarding mechanism of relapse and differences in responses, including differences among patients with different co-occurring mutations.
This is a multi-centre, prospective cohort study, aiming to evaluate a blood test in early detection of the four common cancers, based on the investigation of the circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Primary objective: To evaluate the performance characteristics of the blood ctDNA test in early detecting cancers. Secondary objectives: - To evaluate the performance characteristics of the test in determining the origin of tumour, as compared to the findings of the imaging diagnostic tests. - To determine the risk of cancers development in the high-risk population, as compared to that in the moderate-risk group.
The main purpose of the study is to investigate whether a tailor-made nutritional and exercise program including home-based sessions and regular monitoring using an application on the smartphone is effective in improving Quality of Life in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal tract cancer.
DCE-CT of thoracic tumors as an early biomarker for treatment monitoring in comparison with morphologic criteria. 1. Rationale of the clinical investigation For the evaluation of response to anti-tumoral therapy in thoracic tumors, merely morphologic information is often not sufficient for early response evaluation as dimensions of the oncologic lesions are not changing during the first weeks of treatment. To be able to measure functional changes, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) seems promising as a biomarker for early therapy monitoring. Having an early biomarker for treatment monitoring will allow to increase patients' prognosis if a non-responder is earlier detected, will optimize the use of expensive treatments, is expected to shorten hospitalization and shorten absence at work, and to decrease side-effects of (adjuvant) medication. 2. Objective of the study 2.1.Primary objectives The primary objective is to investigate the potential of functional imaging (i.e. DCE-CT), as analyzed by the Hyperfusion analytic software, as an early biomarker for the evaluation of therapy response in primary thoracic malignancy. 2.2.Secondary objectives There are two secondary objectives: 1. To define internal system parameters and perfusion parameter thresholds that maximize the accuracy of the outcomes and to define the correct category (PD, SD, PR, CR); and 2. To compare the predicted categorization to the assessed RECIST1.1 categorization. 3. Endpoints 3.1.Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is to directly compare the biomarker of the HF analysis software at week 3 (+- 1 week) and week 8 (+- 3 weeks) with the eventually reported Progression-Free Survival (PFS) intervals and Overall Survival (OS) in this study. PFS intervals are determined by the clinician and are based on RECIST1.1 and additional clinical and biochemical progression markers. The focus will be on evaluating the accuracy of the prediction as well as how early the prediction was correct. 3.2.Secondary Endpoints There are two secondary endpoints corresponding to the two secondary objectives. 1. The internal parameters for the HF biomarker, e.g. magnitude of the Ktrans decrease, and the change in volume of unhealthy tissue, need to be determined to define the classification (PD, SD, PR and CR) by the HF analysis software. These parameters are optimized to optimally predict the classification according to PFS and OS. This will be done by splitting the data into a train and test set to ensure generalization. 2. The classification of the HF analysis software will be compared to the purely morphological classification by RECIST1.1 to identify correlation. Furthermore, some cases will be investigated where the HF analysis performs noticeably better or worse than RECIST1.1 in predicting PFS and OS. Finally, the difference in time to the first correct prediction is compared between HF and RECIST1.1. 4.Study Design This prospective study is part of the clinical β-phase. We aim to test pre-release versions of the Hyperfusion.ai software under real-world working conditions in a hospital (clinical) setting. It is important to note, though, that the results of the software analysis will not be used by interpreting physicians to alter clinical judgement during the course of the clinical trial. A prospective study including 100 inoperable patients in UZ Gent suffering from primary thoracic malignancy (≥15mm diameter) will be conducted. For this study, in total 3 CT scan examinations of the thorax will be performed (a venous CT examination of the thorax in combination with a DCE-CT scan of the tumoral region). All patients will be recruited from the pulmonology department. Oncologic patients are clinically referred with certain intervals for a clinically indicated CT scan (being part of standard care). In the study, two clinical CT examinations that are performed standard of care (baseline CT examination and CT examination at week 8 (+- 3 weeks) after start of systemic therapy) will be executed by also adding a DCE-image of the lung adenocarcinoma to this examination. This DCE-image is performed during the waiting time before the venous/morphologic phase. Consequently, from a clinical point-of-view, the time to scan remains exactly the same. With regard to the contrast agent, an identical amount is injected as is the case in standard of care, but the contrast bolus is split in two parts - see also addendum with DCE protocol. In this study there is one additional CT-examination (DCE-scan of the thoracic malignancy in combination with venous CT scan of the thorax) at week 3 (± 1 week).
This study is applicable to patients undergoing lower lung or abdomen stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) treatment. The purpose of the ACE 01 study is to identify if, the volume of healthy tissue within the treatment area and therefore subsequent side effects, can be reduced by using a commercially available abdominal compression device to minimise breathing related movement. The secondary aim will be to assess patient compliance and comfort of thedevice. This will be assessed by asking the patient to complete a 'patient comfort questionnaire'. In addition the radiographers will be asked to complete a 'satisfaction questionnaire' to determine ease and reproducibility of use.
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancer diseases, globally and locally. Several health benefits of increased physical activity (PA) have been reported for people with cancer. PA plays a critical role across the cancer trajectory, from prevention through to post-diagnosis and has been proposed as an alternative for improving physical and psychosocial health outcomes, reducing cancer recurrence, and cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Although there are a variety of exercise intervention programs for cancer patients, those programs were quite intensive, requiring individuals to commit extra time and effort. Feeling of overwhelmed appointments, lack of time, other barriers, including high cost and limited access to facilities are the most frequently reported barriers that prevent people from starting and maintaining exercise. Hence, the investigators propose to use a brief messaging lifestyle modification intervention program to incorporating simple and easy-to-do patient-centred home-based lifestyle-integrated exercise into daily activities of patients with lung cancer. The aims are to increase patients' physical activity and improve their fatigue, emotion and quality of life, compared to the control group.