Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06185465
Other study ID # 2023-075
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 3, 2024
Est. completion date February 28, 2025

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source The First Hospital of Jilin University
Contact Jia'ao Yu, Professor
Phone +86 13804337395
Email yuja@jlu.edu.cn
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B . - Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups. - 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups. - Wound healing rate - Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score. - Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound. - Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date February 28, 2025
Est. primary completion date February 21, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 1. Voluntarily sign the informed consent form; - 2. =18 years old; - 3. Patients with chronic wound, eg. burns, and pressure injuries with stage 3 and 4. Diabetes foot ulcer with Wagner grade 2; (Staging and Wagner grading of stress injury can be found in attachments 1 and 2); - 4. The length and width of a single wound in the wound area where the sampling point is located must be =2 cm, and the maximum length and width must be =10 cm; - 5. The rapid smear test results of bacteria on the wound were positive; - 6. The clinical symptoms of wound infection meet the following conditions: skin infection level scale score (SIRS) = 8; - 7. Patients identified by the investigator as having biofilm formation on the wound; - 8. No eschar covering the wound surface. Exclusion Criteria: - 1. Patients administered with systemic antibiotics 48 hours before enrollment; - 2. Patients with severe autoimmune diseases; - 3. Patients with pressure injuries classified as Stage I and II; (Please refer to Attachment 1 for for pressure injury staging); - 4. Diabetes foot ulcer with Wagner grade0- 1 and more than 3; (Wagner grading of stress injury can be found in attachments 2); - 5. Female in pregnancy or lactation period; - 6. Those who have participated in clinical trials of drugs or devices within one month before the first treatment; - 7. Patients who are allergic to any component of the research device; - 8. Those who are currently using tumor chemotherapy drugs during screening; - 9. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk to the subjects or otherwise affect the evaluation of efficacy.

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution
After debridement surgery, the test group is selected according to the randomization number of enrollment. For experimental group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution is extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
Normal Saline
After debridement surgery, the test group is selected according to the randomization number of enrollment. For control group, normal saline is extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.

Locations

Country Name City State
China First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin
China Fujian Medical University Union Hospital Fuzhou Fujian
China Shenzhen Second People's Hospital Shenzhen Shenzhen

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The First Hospital of Jilin University Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm=the total score of 3 tissues before treatment- the total score of 3 tissues treatment after 7days. To compare the score difference between 2 groups after the difference is calculated. Day0, Day7
Secondary Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm=the total score of 3 tissues before treatment- the total score of 3 tissues treatment after 3 days. To compare the score difference between 2 groups after the difference is calculated Day0, Day3
Secondary Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups If any of the 3 samples is tested positive for the biofilm, the result will be judged positive (+); If no biofilm is detected in the 3 samples, the result will be judged negative (-). Day0, Day3,Day7
Secondary 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups Typing I: 0 point is scored in case of free bacteria, i.e., dispersed phase of monomer bacteria; Typing II: 0 points are scored in case of bacterial adhesion, i.e., aggregation phase of monomer bacteria; Typing III&IV: 3 points are scored in case of mature bacterial biofilm, i.e., closed phase of colony bacteria; 3 points are scored in case of spreading of bacterial biofilm, i.e., open phase of colony bacteria. Day0, Day3,Day7
Secondary Wound healing rate The wound is covered with sterile mesh film before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, the wound area is measured and recorded, and the difference in wound healing rate among the two groups is compared. Day0, Day3,Day7
Secondary Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score o Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) scoring is conducted and recorded before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment to compare the differences of SIRS scores among the two groups.
SIRS scoring Items include Exudate / pus, Scabbing, Erythema/Inflammation, Tissue edema, Tissue fever, Pruritus and Pain. The scores of every items are 0=none, 1=mild, 2= Moderate, 3= severe.
Day0, Day3,Day7
Secondary Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound The H-E staining pathological sections of inflammatory cells on the wound are carried out before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment to compare the differences in the distribution type (Monocytes/Neutrophils/Lymphocytes) and quantity(No infiltration, mild infiltration, moderate infiltration, severe infiltration) of inflammatory cells on the wound among the two groups.
mild infiltration refers to the infiltration of less than or equal to 10 inflammatory cells; moderate infiltration refers to the infiltration of 11-50 inflammatory cells; severe infiltration refers to the infiltration of more than 50 inflammatory cells.
Day0, Day3,Day7
Secondary Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm According to the test results, the number of bacteria positive cases and number of drug-resistant positive bacteria cases are counted, and the difference in anti-infection ability of the two groups after 3 and 7 days of wound treatment is compared by the number of positive cases/total number of burn patients in each group and the number of drug-resistant bacteria positive cases/total number of burn patients in each group. Day0, Day3,Day7
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05023135 - DeepView SnapShot Portable (DV-SSP): Device Training Study
Completed NCT05276869 - Reliability and Feasibility of WeeFIM Instrument to Measure Functional Independence in Pediatric Burns
Completed NCT04548635 - VR for Burn Dressing Changes at Home Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT06076031 - Effects of Applying Streaming Media on Reducing Pain in Patient With Second-degree Burn During Changing Dressing N/A
Recruiting NCT05084248 - Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults Following a Major Burn Injury Phase 4
Completed NCT03113253 - TRANexamic Acid to Reduce Bleeding in BURN Surgery Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04090424 - Assessment of Safety and Effectiveness of NovoSorb® BTM in Severe Burns N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05649891 - Checklists Resuscitation Emergency Department N/A
Withdrawn NCT03159182 - Study of Silicone Material Inserts To Treat Burn Scars N/A
Recruiting NCT02904941 - Human Amniotic Versus Synthetic Membrane as a Transient Skin Cover for Pediatric Burns N/A
Completed NCT02681757 - Comparison of Mepitel Ag vs Antibiotic Ointment Used With Soft Cast Technique for Treatment of Pediatric Burns N/A
Recruiting NCT01812941 - Evaluation of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Severe Burn and Trauma Patients N/A
Completed NCT01437852 - StrataGraft® Skin Tissue as an Alternative to Autografting Deep Partial-Thickness Burns Phase 1
Completed NCT01214811 - Open Multi-centre Investigation to Evaluate Signs and Symptoms of Local Inflammation/Infection on Chronic Ulcers and Partial Thickness Burns When Using Mepilex Border Ag as an Anti-microbial Wound Dressing Phase 3
Completed NCT01061502 - Efficacy Study of a Bioelectric Dressing to Treat Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT00822796 - Thermogard™ Efficacy Trial N/A
Terminated NCT00634166 - Effects of Therapy With Sulfamylon® 5% Topical Solution Compared to a Historical Control Group Phase 4
Terminated NCT00824681 - Effect of Music Therapy on Families of Burn Patients Phase 1
Terminated NCT00464386 - Continuous Glucose Monitoring (POC) in the ICU N/A
Withdrawn NCT00216983 - Proline Metabolism in Severely Burned Patients: Effect of Modulated Parenteral Feeding N/A