View clinical trials related to Bronchiectasis.
Filter by:The clinical trial aimes to evaluate multiple large language models in respiratory disease consultations by comparing their performance to that of human doctors across three major medical consultation scenarios. The main question aims to answer are: - How do large language models perform in comparison to human doctors in diagnosing and consulting on respiratory diseases across various clinical scenarios? In three clinical scenarios including the online query section, the disease diagnosis section and the medical explanation section, research assistants or volunteers will be asked to cross-question all LLMs or real doctors using predefined online questions and their own issues. After each questioning session, a short washout period is implemented to eliminate potential biases.
It is to determine the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation by telerehabilitation method in bronchiectasis patients. The cases meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized and divided into two groups, the groups will be named as Telerehabilitation Exercise Group (TRGr) and Control Group (CGr).
Introduction: Non-CF, non-PCD bronchiectasis in children is a chronic, suppurative lung disease diagnosed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging of the lungs. Spirometry can be abnormal in bronchiectasis but has been shown to be insensitive to early disease in other related conditions such as cystic fibrosis. Lung clearance index (LCI) could have a role in assessment of the disease. Lung clearance index is calculated from multiple breath washout tests. There are limited data on the normative values expected using some devices, in a range of ages, and between ethnic groups. The investigators aim to establish normative values in children aged between 6 years and 12 years, to investigate differences between ethnic groups, and to establish the relationship between lung clearance index and other measures of disease in children with bronchiectasis. Methods: Healthy children will be recruited from a range of settings and reviewed to ensure no previous lung disease. Children with bronchiectasis diagnosed on HRCT will be recruited from the outpatient service of Birmingham Children's Hospital. All participants will perform lung function tests including LCI and spirometry. Basic demographic data was collected.
Smoking cessation support is provided by smoking cessation outpatient clinics in our country. Smokers with chronic airway diseases can also apply to these services by making an appointment from quit lines. Quit rates of that group patients were found to be similar to the general population. In novel smoking cessation support approaches immediate cessation support is reported to be more effective than routine practice. The sample in these studies consists of individuals who applied for lung health screening programmes. There is no study in the literature examining the effect of this immediate support on patients with chronic airway diseases' quit success. Our aim with this study is to examine impact of immediate cessation support by getting an appointment to the same cessation clinic instantly on our sample's cessation success.
The purpose of this study is to gather information on the effectiveness on a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with bronchiectasis.
This study aims to evaluate the impact of a specific oral probiotic blend on the quality of life of adults with respiratory conditions.
This is a randomized, Phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARINA-1 compared to placebo (isotonic saline, 0.9%) in participants with NCFBE. Study participants will receive either study treatment or placebo twice daily for 28 days. Efficacy endpoints will include quality of life, sputum rheological markers, and blood inflammatory markers. Quality of life will be measured using the following tools: Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) questionnaire, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT), and a daily clinical global impression questionnaire.
Reduced exercise tolerance is commonly reported in patients with bronchiectasis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of expiratory muscle training (EMT) and sham EMT (control) on exercise capacity, respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength, cough strength and health related quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis.
A number of studies have described low exercise capacity and physical activity in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (non-CF Bronchiectasis), although little research exists on using the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to evaluate exercise capacity and its most relevant changes after a pulmonary rehabilitation home-based program (PRHP). In addition, few studies have addressed tolerance to exercise and physical activity in severe cases of the disease. Aims: To evaluate the exercise capacity of non-CF BQ patients using CPET and physical activity after a pulmonary rehabilitation home-based program. Methodology: Our study describes a non-pharmacological clinical trial in non-CF BQ patients at the Virgen Macarena University Hospital (Seville, Spain). The patients were randomized into two groups: the control group (who were provided with training instructions) and the intervention group (who took part in a specific pulmonary rehabilitation home-based program).
This study is open to adults with bronchiectasis. People can join the study if they produce sputum and have a history of flare-ups (also called exacerbations). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called BI 1291583 helps people with bronchiectasis. Participants are put into 4 groups randomly, which means by chance. Participants in groups 1, 2, and 3 get different doses of BI 1291583. Participants in group 4 get placebo. Placebo tablets look like BI 1291583 tablets, but do not contain any medicine. Participants take the tablets once a day. Participants are in the study for between 6 months and 1 year. During this time, they visit the study site about 10 times and get about 5 phone calls from the site staff. The doctors document when participants experience flare-ups during the study. The time to the first flare-ups is compared between the treatment groups. Doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.