View clinical trials related to Bronchial Spasm.
Filter by:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether 2 puffs of fixed combination of aerosolized 120 mcg salbutamol sulphate (equivalent to 100 mcg of the base) + 20 mcg ipratropium bromide confers significant additional protection against metacholine induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic atopic patients when compared to 2 puffs of aerosolized 100 mcg salbutamol alone.
The purpose of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetics of nebulized amikacin administered with three vibrating mesh nebulizers coupled with a single limb circuit bilevel ventilator in healthy volunteers. Following our previous in vitro study, our hypotheses are that the pharmacokinetics varies among the devices tested and that a most efficient device can be identified.
The study will be conducted in two hospitals of the same geographic area. It will be included children <3-years-old with recurrent wheezing attacks, confirmed by the review of the medical records, in the previous 12 months or a shorter time for those younger than one year.
This will be a double-blind placebo-controlled study in which we plan to study 40 competitive endurance athletes. We will conduct an exercise test to evaluate maximal oxygen uptake and 2 exercise challenge tests to provoke EIA. Prior to the exercise challenge tests the athletes will randomly receive inhaled placebo or inhaled ipratropium bromide. We will compare the athletes' airway response to the exercise challenge with and without the active drug.
Inhaled steroids, in particular beclomethasone, are widely prescribed in Italy as symptomatic treatment of upper respiratory infections without evidence of efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of beclomethasone (administered by nebuliser twice a day) in preventing viral wheezing in pre-school children who had had episodes in the preceding 12 months.
The main objective is to evaluate the bronchodilatory efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of A006 (Albuterol Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI)), in comparison with those of an active control, Proventil-HFA (Albuterol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)), and a Placebo DPI in escalating and cumulative-doses up to 1440 mcg, eight (8) times of the proposed clinical dose.
This study examines the pharmacokinetic profile of Armstrong's proposed Epinephrine Inhalation Aerosol USP, an HFA-MDI (E004), using a stable isotope deuterium-labeled epinephrine (epinephrine-d3) to differentiate the administered drug from the endogenous epinephrine, in healthy male and female adult volunteers. The current study is designed for a more thorough evaluation of the E004 Pharmacokinetics. Safety of E004 will also be evaluated, under augmented dose conditions.
This study is a randomized, active- and placebo-controlled, single-dose, seven-arm, crossover and dose-ranging design. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and initial safety profiles, and to identify the optimum dose of A006, from a select dose-range for future clinical PK/PD and Phase III studies. This study is to be conducted in generally healthy, adult subjects who have mild-to-moderate persistent asthma for at least 6 months prior to Screening.
In response to the European regulatory authorities, GSK is conducting a post-marketing observational study to assess the efficacy of Relenza when used as prophylaxis against influenza. SPECIFIC AIMS 1. Determine the frequency of patients who received Relenza from October 2006 through April 2009, and among them the number who have no concurrent diagnosis of influenza, i.e., those receiving Relenza for prophylaxis, and among these the number who have a family member with a medical visit for influenza within three days preceding the above indentified patient's dispensing of Relenza. This is to determine the feasibility of conducting detailed analysis. 2. If analysis is feasible then tabulate the frequency of influenza-like-illness and respiratory outcomes in users of prophylactic Relenza and their family members and in family members of persons using Relenza for the treatment of influenza (i.e., index cases). 3. If analysis is feasible then estimate the direct effect of prophylactic Relenza on the occurrence of influenza-like-illness and respiratory outcomes, the secondary effect of Relenza treatment of influenza on susceptible family members, and the total effect of Relenza (treatment plus prophylaxis). METHODS Overview of Study Design This is an analysis of the 30-day risk of influenza-like illness and respiratory outcomes in persons for whom some household members (index cases) have had a medical visit associated with a diagnosis of influenza. The exposed individuals to the index case will be categorized into one of four cohorts according to whether the exposed person received prophylactic Relenza or no antiviral treatment and by whether the index family member with a diagnosis of influenza received antiviral treatment. Estimates of the direct effect of Relenza prophylaxis, the indirect effectof preventing disease in susceptible family members, and the total effect of disease reduction when both index cases and susceptible family members are treated will be obtained from different comparisons between cohorts, as outlined below. The research will cover the first three influenza seasons during which Relenza has been indicated for prophylactic use in the United States. These will be from October through April of 2006-2009.
Delivery of HFA albuterol through an antistatic valved holding chamber (VHC) will improve bronchodilator response during nocturnal bronchospasm.