View clinical trials related to Brief Intervention.
Filter by:This study will evaluate the effect of a brief intervention on anthropometric and metabolic changes in overweight women with low health literacy. The total number of samples was determined as 88. It was decided to recruit a total of 124 people, 62 people in each group, with a 40% loss in the groups. Brief intervention interviews will be conducted with the intervention group. Brief intervention interviews will take an average of 20-30 minutes and four times. The control group will not be intervened except for the first and last evaluations.
Background: Cannabis is the most prevalent illegal drug used in France, and consequences arising from the step of 'casual consumers'(1-10 joints/month). Side effects of cannabis are now well documented: Trauma (driving after consuming cannabis), respiratory, cardiovascular diseases and psychiatric and social problems. The general practitioner (GP) is the health professional most viewed by adolescents. Brief interventions (BI) for adult alcohol use have been shown to be efficient. Some BI have been designed to inspect adolescents and consumption of cannabis have been piloted, showing their feasibility, but no test has validated them. Aim : Does a BI conducted by general practitioners reduce consumption of canabis in 15 to 19 years old ? Method: Two preliminary qualitative studies (with adolescents and GP), were used to analyze the difficulties of communication around cannabis use. The Scientific Committee has analyzed the results and developed a workshop around BI, adapted to adolescents cannabis users. CANABIC is a quantitative study to validate use of BI with cannabis users: a randomized controlled trial, clustered study, comparing an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). The intervention is the achievement of the IB during a specific consultation. The outcome is the consumption of cannabic (Number of joints / month). The study will be carried out in 3 french regions : Auvergne, Rhône-Alpes and Languedoc-Roussillon. 150 GPs wil be recruited and randomized in intervention group or control group (ratio 1 :1). Each GP will inlcude 5 adolescents (i.e. a total of 750 adolescents) - . The number of adolescents needed has been calculate with hypothesis of a significant difference of 30% in consumption of cannabis between adolescents who beneficied of BI (IG) and those who do not experienced BI ( CG) A pilot study has been conducted. Cannabis use by adolescents has decreased. Their perception of cannabis has changed: they are aware of the harmful effects of their consumption. This pilot study has improve many points of the protocol. Results: A decrease of 30% of consumption is expected (joints per month). Perception of cannabis by adolescents will be reviewed. Conclusions: To validate an IB adaptated to consultation with adolscents cannabis consumer in order to provide a tool for GP in their daily practice.
Although screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) approaches are effective in reducing alcohol misuse and its associated risk-taking behaviors and negative consequences, there is little research demonstrating the effectiveness of SBIRT for illicit and/or prescription drug misuse. Misusers of illicit and/or prescription drugs frequently seek medical care in emergency departments (EDs), particularly for reasons related to their misuse. As a result, the ED is well suited as a site to conduct an analysis of the effectiveness of SBIRT for this population. The Brief Intervention for Drug Misuse for the Emergency Department (BIDMED) study is a randomized, controlled, trial that will include adult ED patients at a large, academic, trauma center (Rhode Island Hospital) and a community hospital (The Miriam Hospital) who have a subcritical illness or injury and whose screening indicates illicit and/or prescription drug misuse. BIDMED participants will be randomized to receive screening only (SO) or brief intervention (BI) with appropriate referral to treatment. Participants will complete a battery of blinded baseline assessments using standardized instruments as well as adapted instruments specific to the aims of this study. All participants will undergo blinded follow-up assessments at three, six, and twelve months post-randomization. The primary hypotheses addressed in the BIDMED study are that, compared to participants in the SO arm, participants in the BI arm will show a significantly greater reduction in: (1) drug misuse within the prior 30 days at three months post-randomization, (2) behaviors associated with drug misuse at six months post-randomization; and (3) negative physical health, psychosocial health, and socioeconomic consequences at twelve months post-randomization. As a secondary aim, the impact of BI compared to SO will be assessed on participants contacting, enrolling in, and completing a drug treatment program. In addition, the impact of BI compared to SO on increasing uptake of HIV and hepatitis B/C screening will be measured. A mechanisms of change model that addresses the expected mediators and moderators of change to explain the effects of SBIRT in this setting will also be developed and tested. Further, the epidemiology of illicit and/or prescription drug misuse will be assessed in a random sample of ED patients.