Breast Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Does the Wording of Text Message Reminders Improve Uptake in Breast Screening? A Randomised Controlled Trial
Breast screening is a service offered by the NHS to help detect breast cancer and
precancerous changes early at a time when treatment is more likely to be curative. An
effective service must reach the 'at risk' but asymptomatic population. Breast screening
uptake in London, consistently falls below the national target and is well below the national
average. Uptake in West London is particularly low, with boroughs in Inner North West London
having the some of lowest uptake rates in the country.
Routine text message reminders have proven effective at improving uptake of breast screening
appointments. However little attention is paid to the content of the messages. Previous
studies of text message reminders in other clinical areas have shown that the content of
these messages matters and some text messages are more effective than others.
This protocol describes the design of a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect
of differently worded text messages on the engagement with breast screening in West London.
Two intervention arms were designed taking into consideration results of a 1000 woman survey
to highlight the behavioural barriers that most predict attendance. The survey tested 15
behavioural constructs and the two that most strongly predicted history of attendance were
used to inform the text message content of the intervention arms for this trial.
To this end, this randomised controlled trial (RCT) will test the current standard practice
text message reminder against two intervention text message trial arms informed by the above
described survey.
The setting is West of London Breast Screening Service and women aged 47-73 who are due for
screening will be randomized to receive one of the three trial arms.
The primary outcome is the difference in uptake between trial arms. Further statistical
analysis will analyse the difference in uptake by age group, deprivation score and previous
attendance status.
Result will inform how small changes to the word content may have significant effects on
attendance at screening mammogram appointments.
Background
In the UK breast cancer is the most common female cancer affecting 1 in 8 women, accounting
for 31% of all cancers and 15% of cancer deaths in women.1 The NHS breast screening programme
(NHSBSP) offers 3-yearly screening to women aged 50-70 years. A pilot of extended screening
ages of 47-73 is being trialed in some geographical areas.
In 2015, 75% of women in England attended breast screening. In the same year only 68.3% of
women in London and 65.9% in West London respectively had an up-to-day mammogram in the
previous 3 years. 2 This falls below both the national average and target uptake of 70%. The
success of a screening programme not only relies on the sensitivity of the screening tool and
availability of successful treatment but also on reaching the asymptomatic but at risk
population.
Recent evidence in breast screening has shown that a simple text message reminder (TMR) is
effective. 3,4. One randomized controlled trial showed an increase in attendance by as much
as 12%.5 As a result TMRs are being used more frequently by NHS organisations, but with
little consideration paid their word content.
Further research testing the word content of TMR to remind patients of routine outpatient
hospital appointments has shown that the word choice matters. The most effective message
reduced 'did not attend' rates by 3.4 percentage points compared to a control TMR at a London
Hospital. 6
Objective
This study aims to test if the word content of TMRs affects the uptake of breast screening.
Trial design
The investigators propose to collaborate with West of London Breast Screening Service
(WoLBSS) to test different TMRs through an RCT to increase screening uptake.
The trial will test the effect of differently worded TMRs on the uptake of breast screening
in eligible women in West London. This three-armed RCT will test two intervention arms
against the current control arm.
Current practice is for women to receive two TMRs at 7 and 4 days prior to their appointment.
Therefore the current message will be maintained as the control message for both TMR 1 (7
days prior to appointment) and TMR 2 (4 days prior to appointment). The intervention arms
will contain the intervention TMRs and will be sent out as both TMR1 and TMR2. During the
trial period women due for screening will be randomized to receive one of the three trial
arms (control, intervention arm 1 or intervention arm 2. The TMRs will be sent out 7 days and
4 days before the breast screening appointment during the trial period as they are currently
sent out as part of routine practice. Women will receive the same message on the 7th day and
the 4th day before their appointment. WoLBSS will inform the research team of a woman's
attendance status at the end of the screening rounds.
Methods:
Study setting
This study will be run in West London in collaboration with WoLBSS, which currently provides
the routine TMR service based on data from a previous trial.5 The research team will work
closely with the WoLBSS team to run the RCT through the existing infrastructure used to send
out current messages.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Women who are eligible and due for breast screening in West London.
Exclusion Criteria
Women who are not eligible for breast screening due to for example bilateral mastectomies.
Women who have chosen to not have screening and have informed the screening centre or their
GP.
Withdrawal Criteria
Any woman who chooses to not take part in screening or to receive a TMR and has informed the
screening centre or their GP.
Interventions
The RCT will have three arms.
1. control (current TMR)
2. Intervention 1 - Behavioural regulation TMR
3. Intervention 2 - Priority TMR
The choice of the content of the intervention text messages has been based on a survey of
1000 women run by the research team that evaluated how 15 behavioural constructs predicted
the outcome measures of women's history of attendance and their intention to attend. Two
strong constructs that predict both history of attendance and intention to attend were
'behavioural regulation' i.e. making a plan/note in a diary to attend breast screening and
'priority' i.e. how much a woman feels that screening is a priority.
Therefore the word content of two TMRs was constructed to take these into account.
Both intervention TMRs have been reviewed and approved by the WoLBSS routine care team as
well as the clinical lead for screening and a Public Health Consultant in Cancer screening at
NHS England.
Control - (current TMR)
'Don't forget your breast screening appointment at (time) (date) at (Site). Please call
02033136644 to rearrange or cancel'
Intervention arm 1 - Behavioural Regulation
'Don't forget to make a diary note of your screening mammogram appt at (time) (date) at
(site). Call 02033136644 to rearrange.'
Intervention arm 2 - Priority
'Is your breast screening appointment on your priority list? Apt at (time), (date) at (site).
Call 02033136644 to rearrange.'
Outcomes
The primary end point is the rate of uptake of screening at the end of the screening round.
Trial arms will be powered and sample size collected to detect a 3% uptake in screening. The
trial will close when the sample size is reached.
The secondary outcomes are uptake according to age, deprivation score and previous history of
attendance.
Participant Timeline
Women will be routinely invited for their screening mammogram as per standard procedure
approximately three weeks before their appointment. The research team will then randomise an
anonymized list of women to receive one of the three TMRs. The TMR will then be sent at the
same times as the current standard TMRs are sent out 7 and 4 days prior to the appointment.
Sample Size
The sample size was calculated to detect a 3% difference in uptake between groups with a 5%
margin for type I and 20% margin for type II error. This expected improvement in uptake is
deemed to be both realistic and operationally significant to the service. The uptake in West
London in 2015 was 65.9%. The investigators therefore calculated a minimum sample size for
each trial arm to be 3,832 with a total sample size of 11,496.
Recruitment
For each screening round WoLBSS will invite women for breast screening as per usual. It is
not possible to identify at the time of randomization which women have provided WoLBSS with
their phone number. For this reason all women due for screening will be randomised. However,
only women who have given their mobile phone number will be able to receive a TMR.
Randomisation
Each screening round a list of women will be forward to iPlato Patient Care Messaging with
their allocated appointment date, time and location. The participant list will then be
randomised by iPlato into trial arms and allocated to receive one of the three TMRs using the
Mersenne Twister algorithm.
Once randomised the list of women due for screening will be uploaded to the iPlato platform.
The iPlato system will link each patients NHS number to WoLBSS record and retrieve a mobile
phone number where one is available.
WoLBSS uses iPlato Patient Care Messaging currently to send out the existing text message
reminder. iPlato is a communication platform developed specifically for health services and
can send reminder messages on behalf of GPs and hospitals.
Data collection and management
Data will be collected by the WoLBSS IT system including the primary research outcome of
attendance status. iPlato will collect data on accuracy of phone numbers and messages
delivery status. Anonymised data will be retrieved and passed onto the research team. The
data will be handled on NHS N3 computers with password protection, the research team's
personal laptops with secure password protection and Imperial College London's secure virtual
private network. Any transmission of data via email will be within secure NHS.net and NHS
trust email accounts between WoLBSS and the research team and within the secure Imperial
College email accounts and the virtual private network amongst the research team.
Data collected will include the age, year of birth, first 3-4 digits of the postcode,
ethnicity, previous attendance history and availability of a mobile phone number.
It is possible that participants are subject to other trials however due to the nature of the
trial it is not appropriate to contact patients to find out. It is not necessary in terms of
impact on the results.
Consent
The premise of the study is whether a subtle change in a text message can increase the number
of patients attending their breast screening appointment. A pre-warning that patients may
receive TMR that may be modified would undermine the premise of the study and affect results.
This is because of participation bias, which would indicate that subjects who know they are
participating in a trial are more likely to try and do what they think the researcher wants
them to do. Taking explicit consent would therefore also undermine the study design.
Only women who have given them mobile phone number to WoLBSS directly, will be able to
receive a TMR prior to their appointment. Therefore they have in the past given explicit
consent to receive a TMR by the service. No woman who has not previously given her mobile
number to the service will receive a TMR.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04681911 -
Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04890327 -
Web-based Family History Tool
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04066790 -
Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03591848 -
Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03954197 -
Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02202746 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01472094 -
The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT06049446 -
Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT06057636 -
Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05560334 -
A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05501769 -
ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04631835 -
Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04307407 -
Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03544762 -
Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02482389 -
Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00068003 -
Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
|
||
Completed |
NCT00226967 -
Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06019325 -
Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |