Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06079086
Other study ID # LIFESIL_001
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2014
Est. completion date May 30, 2024

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source Lifesil
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The breasts are paired, superficial organs with relative symmetry. They particularly characterize femininity as an erogenous area, in addition to playing an extremely important role in a woman's body aesthetics. Breast augmentation surgery aims to add volume or restore breast volume lost post-pregnancy or weight loss, often establishing a balance in the body silhouette and increasing self-esteem. Breast implants cause an inflammatory reaction with the consequent formation of a fibrous capsule around the implant, which can evolve with different degrees of contraction. Different factors are involved with the formation and intensity of the peri-prosthetic capsule: presence of hematoma, sub-clinical infection, silicone leakage, type of prosthetic envelope, plane/site of prosthesis placement, immune response, among others. The involvement of the envelope texture proved to be a major factor in reducing the formation of capsular contracture, which was clearly evident when covering with polyurethane foam was used. It is estimated that this reduction is due to the three-dimensional structure obtained with this configuration, which would result in a smaller vector resultant of contraction of the capsular fibers. Aiming to obtain less capsular contracture, a silicone prosthesis with a velvet/silicone foam envelope was developed, which theoretically would have the advantage of the velvet/foam structure similar to polyurethane without, however, presenting negative aspects such as degradation, inflammation and eventual toxicity of catabolites. In this way, it is expected to prove the best postoperative evolution regarding the use of silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of the breast position over time. Furthermore, to intend to verify whether the velvet/silicone foam coverage determines a lower incidence of capsular contracture compared to the textured envelope. To this end, evaluation will be carried out through clinical examination and evaluation of digital photographic images taken pre-operatively, 30, 120, and 360 days post-operatively. After a long postoperative period (approximately 9 years), a late follow-up will be carried out with the patients with clinical evaluation and a satisfaction questionnaire.


Description:

The breasts are paired, superficial organs with relative symmetry. They particularly characterize femininity as an erogenous area, in addition to playing an extremely important role in a woman's body aesthetics. Breast augmentation surgery aims to add volume or restore breast volume lost post-pregnancy or weight loss, often establishing a balance in the body silhouette and increasing self-esteem. Breast implants cause an inflammatory reaction with the consequent formation of a fibrous capsule around the implant, which can evolve with different degrees of contraction. Different factors are involved with the formation and intensity of the peri-prosthetic capsule: presence of hematoma, sub-clinical infection, silicone leakage, type of prosthetic envelope, plane/site of prosthesis placement, immune response, among others. The involvement of the envelope texture proved to be a major factor in reducing the formation of capsular contracture, which was clearly evident when covering with polyurethane foam was used. It is estimated that this reduction is due to the three-dimensional structure obtained with this configuration, which would result in a smaller vector resultant of contraction of the capsular fibers. Aiming to obtain less capsular contracture, a silicone prosthesis with a velvet/silicone foam envelope was developed, which theoretically would have the advantage of the velvet/foam structure similar to polyurethane without, however, presenting negative aspects such as degradation, inflammation and eventual toxicity of catabolites. In this way, it is expected to prove the best postoperative evolution regarding the use of silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of the breast position over time. Furthermore, to intend to verify whether the velvet/silicone foam coverage determines a lower incidence of capsular contracture compared to the textured envelope. To this end, evaluation will be carried out through clinical examination and evaluation of digital photographic images taken pre-operatively, 30, 120 and 360 days post-operatively. After a long postoperative period (approximately 9 years), a late follow-up will be carried out with the patients with clinical evaluation and a satisfaction questionnaire. It is expected to demonstrate better postoperative evolution when using silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of position and less capsular contracture. To evaluate the participants' satisfaction with the silicone prosthesis after a prolonged post-operative period, through a satisfaction questionnaire, where the questions will be applied in a face-to-face consultation with the study doctor, who will also evaluate the participants' clinical conditions. Data will be obtained to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the implant over the long term of implantation.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date May 30, 2024
Est. primary completion date July 31, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - who present complaints of hypomastia of different etiologies (constitutional hypotrophy, post-weight loss, post-breastfeeding Exclusion Criteria: - who have already had a prosthesis included before the clinical study and/or for prosthesis exchange - with sequelae of mastectomy with loss of architecture of the breast region and requiring additional surgeries (flaps, grafts) - with decompensated chronic disease - pregnant or postpartum women - minors, vulnerable with mental problems - patients who have breast ptosis and require mastopexy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Breast Implants Lifesil
The surgery is performed through an incision (4 cm) in the inframammary fold and displacement in the supra-muscular plane, creation of a pocket for the inclusion of the prosthesis, followed by strict hemostasis and washing with an antibiotic solution. Placement of the prosthesis by digital maneuver and closure in layers using absorbable synthetic 4-0 polycaprolactone suture. Afterwards, an occlusive dressing is applied to the surgical wound. IV antibiotics (cephalosporin) 1g are administered at the beginning of surgery, followed by repeat/booster doses every 6 hours in the first 24 hours. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory medications are administered, varying according to each patient's restrictions.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Lifesil

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of Adverse Events Evaluate the possible occurrence of capsular contracture, maintenance of the position of the prosthesis and shape of the breasts postoperatively at 30, 120 and 360 days. Through clinical examination and standardized photographic documentation. 1 year
Secondary Evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of prostheses (8-9 years) To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of prostheses in the long term (8-9 years), through a questionnaire applied in a clinical consultation, with a late post-operative follow-up 8-9 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06013514 - Post-market Prospective Clinical Study of Nagor Perle Mammary Implants
Completed NCT00753922 - Core Gel Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Mentor Round Low Bleed Silicone Gel-filled Mammary Prostheses Phase 3
Completed NCT01945463 - The Effect of Breast Augmentation on the Quality of Echocardiography Test N/A
Recruiting NCT05449587 - Long-Term Effectiveness of the Motiva Implants® Round and Round Ergonomix
Completed NCT02302001 - Effects of Jet Hydro Dissection in Breast Augmentation Postoperative Pain N/A
Completed NCT00905645 - Sientra Sponsored Silimed Gel-Filled Breast Implant Core Clinical Study N/A
Completed NCT00756652 - Mentor MemoryGel Post-Approval Study
Terminated NCT01870869 - NATRELLE® 410 X-Style and L-Style Breast Implants Continued Access Study N/A
Completed NCT00684749 - A Pilot Study to Evaluate the BodyLogic TM System (Mentor) in Augmentation Mammaplasty N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03386682 - Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of ESTYME® MATRIX Round and Anatomical Breast Implants - EMMIE Study N/A
Completed NCT01146275 - A 7-year Follow up of All Subjects Incuded in Protocol 31GB0106 N/A
Completed NCT00663156 - A Prospective Study of Autologous Fat Grafting for Breast Augmentation N/A
Completed NCT00605670 - Measuring Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Following Body Image Altering Surgery N/A
Completed NCT01639742 - European New Texture Implant Clinical Experience With Round Breast Implants N/A
Completed NCT01639755 - European New Texture Implant Clinical Experience With Shaped Breast Implants Phase 4
Completed NCT04036487 - Effects of General Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery After Transaxillary Endoscopic Breast Augmentation N/A
Completed NCT01238601 - Upright Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Study - Breast Implant Shell Geometry and Edge Scalloping N/A
Completed NCT03467724 - Treatment of Surgical Scars Following Breast Augmentation, Abdominoplasty or Face Lift N/A
Completed NCT02235285 - Asian Outcomes of Primary Breast Augmentation N/A
Completed NCT00689871 - Safety and Effectiveness of Natrelle(TM) Cohesive Round Silicone-Filled Breast Implants N/A