Evaluation of the Clinical Evolution of Breast Increase Using Prostheses

Breast Augmentation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of the Clinical Evolution of Breast Increase Using Prostheses With Textured Silicone Envelope and Prostheses With Silicone Velvet Envelope

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06079086
• Other study ID #: LIFESIL_001
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 1, 2014
• Est. completion date: May 30, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: October 2023
• Source: Lifesil
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The breasts are paired, superficial organs with relative symmetry. They particularly characterize femininity as an erogenous area, in addition to playing an extremely important role in a woman's body aesthetics. Breast augmentation surgery aims to add volume or restore breast volume lost post-pregnancy or weight loss, often establishing a balance in the body silhouette and increasing self-esteem. Breast implants cause an inflammatory reaction with the consequent formation of a fibrous capsule around the implant, which can evolve with different degrees of contraction. Different factors are involved with the formation and intensity of the peri-prosthetic capsule: presence of hematoma, sub-clinical infection, silicone leakage, type of prosthetic envelope, plane/site of prosthesis placement, immune response, among others. The involvement of the envelope texture proved to be a major factor in reducing the formation of capsular contracture, which was clearly evident when covering with polyurethane foam was used. It is estimated that this reduction is due to the three-dimensional structure obtained with this configuration, which would result in a smaller vector resultant of contraction of the capsular fibers. Aiming to obtain less capsular contracture, a silicone prosthesis with a velvet/silicone foam envelope was developed, which theoretically would have the advantage of the velvet/foam structure similar to polyurethane without, however, presenting negative aspects such as degradation, inflammation and eventual toxicity of catabolites. In this way, it is expected to prove the best postoperative evolution regarding the use of silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of the breast position over time. Furthermore, to intend to verify whether the velvet/silicone foam coverage determines a lower incidence of capsular contracture compared to the textured envelope. To this end, evaluation will be carried out through clinical examination and evaluation of digital photographic images taken pre-operatively, 30, 120, and 360 days post-operatively. After a long postoperative period (approximately 9 years), a late follow-up will be carried out with the patients with clinical evaluation and a satisfaction questionnaire.

Description:

The breasts are paired, superficial organs with relative symmetry. They particularly characterize femininity as an erogenous area, in addition to playing an extremely important role in a woman's body aesthetics. Breast augmentation surgery aims to add volume or restore breast volume lost post-pregnancy or weight loss, often establishing a balance in the body silhouette and increasing self-esteem. Breast implants cause an inflammatory reaction with the consequent formation of a fibrous capsule around the implant, which can evolve with different degrees of contraction. Different factors are involved with the formation and intensity of the peri-prosthetic capsule: presence of hematoma, sub-clinical infection, silicone leakage, type of prosthetic envelope, plane/site of prosthesis placement, immune response, among others. The involvement of the envelope texture proved to be a major factor in reducing the formation of capsular contracture, which was clearly evident when covering with polyurethane foam was used. It is estimated that this reduction is due to the three-dimensional structure obtained with this configuration, which would result in a smaller vector resultant of contraction of the capsular fibers. Aiming to obtain less capsular contracture, a silicone prosthesis with a velvet/silicone foam envelope was developed, which theoretically would have the advantage of the velvet/foam structure similar to polyurethane without, however, presenting negative aspects such as degradation, inflammation and eventual toxicity of catabolites. In this way, it is expected to prove the best postoperative evolution regarding the use of silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of the breast position over time. Furthermore, to intend to verify whether the velvet/silicone foam coverage determines a lower incidence of capsular contracture compared to the textured envelope. To this end, evaluation will be carried out through clinical examination and evaluation of digital photographic images taken pre-operatively, 30, 120 and 360 days post-operatively. After a long postoperative period (approximately 9 years), a late follow-up will be carried out with the patients with clinical evaluation and a satisfaction questionnaire. It is expected to demonstrate better postoperative evolution when using silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of position and less capsular contracture. To evaluate the participants' satisfaction with the silicone prosthesis after a prolonged post-operative period, through a satisfaction questionnaire, where the questions will be applied in a face-to-face consultation with the study doctor, who will also evaluate the participants' clinical conditions. Data will be obtained to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the implant over the long term of implantation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: May 30, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: July 31, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• who present complaints of hypomastia of different etiologies (constitutional hypotrophy, post-weight loss, post-breastfeeding

Exclusion Criteria:

• who have already had a prosthesis included before the clinical study and/or for prosthesis exchange
• with sequelae of mastectomy with loss of architecture of the breast region and requiring additional surgeries (flaps, grafts)
• with decompensated chronic disease
• pregnant or postpartum women
• minors, vulnerable with mental problems
• patients who have breast ptosis and require mastopexy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Breast Augmentation
• Mammoplasty

Intervention

Device:
• Breast Implants Lifesil
The surgery is performed through an incision (4 cm) in the inframammary fold and displacement in the supra-muscular plane, creation of a pocket for the inclusion of the prosthesis, followed by strict hemostasis and washing with an antibiotic solution. Placement of the prosthesis by digital maneuver and closure in layers using absorbable synthetic 4-0 polycaprolactone suture. Afterwards, an occlusive dressing is applied to the surgical wound. IV antibiotics (cephalosporin) 1g are administered at the beginning of surgery, followed by repeat/booster doses every 6 hours in the first 24 hours. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory medications are administered, varying according to each patient's restrictions.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Lifesil

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Incidence of Adverse Events	Evaluate the possible occurrence of capsular contracture, maintenance of the position of the prosthesis and shape of the breasts postoperatively at 30, 120 and 360 days. Through clinical examination and standardized photographic documentation.	1 year
Secondary	Evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of prostheses (8-9 years)	To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of prostheses in the long term (8-9 years), through a questionnaire applied in a clinical consultation, with a late post-operative follow-up	8-9 years