Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04707404 |
Other study ID # |
RJCP2020 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 1, 2016 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2021 |
Source |
RenJi Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Decompressive craniectomy is suggested as an effective surgical intervention for patients
with high intracranial pressure. Recently, various customized artificial materials are
increasingly employed, e.g., titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). The application of
PEEK in cranioplasty is increasing, while its comprehensive evaluation in clinical practice
is still insufficient, especially when comparing with the effects of titanium implant. We
thus designed the study to evaluate the comprehensive effects of the cranioplasty with PEEK
vs titanium.
Description:
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is suggested as an effective surgical intervention for
patients with high intracranial pressure. For the skull defect after DC, cranioplasty could
pro-vide protection, aesthetic and even functional improvements. The autologous bone flap
(ABF) was once thought to be an optimal autograft for repairing [8]. While accumulated
studies reported ABF related disadvantages. Recently, various customized artificial materials
are increasingly employed, e.g., titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK).
Titanium is a widely applied metal material for cranioplasty, attribute to its high strength,
bio-compatibility and comparatively low material cost. Currently, pre-operative three
dimensional (3D) reconstruction of titanium brings a customized implant for optimal shaping
effect. However, titanium implant is still confronted with complications of infection,
implant exposure, etc.
PEEK is a novel polymer used to rebuild the personalized construction. Through the precise
computational reconstruction of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning, the
customized PEEK could more accurately rebuild the complex cranial and maxillofacial
structure. The application of this material in cranioplasty is increasing, while its
comprehensive evaluation in clinical practice is still insufficient, especially when
comparing with the effects of titanium implant.
We thus designed the study to evaluate the comprehensive effects of the cranioplasty with
PEEK vs titanium. The data of the patients implanted PEEK or titanium in four years in our
institute were retrospectively collected and evaluated, in respects of the general
information of patients, postoperative complications, shaping effects, and psychosocial
improvements, to display a comprehensive evaluation for these two implants.