View clinical trials related to Brain Injuries, Traumatic.
Filter by:This was a multicenter randomized controlled study of 98 severe Traumatic Brain Injury patients with tracheostomy. Patients enrolled were divided randomly into the observation group with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding (n=50) or the control group with Nasogastric tube feeding (n=48) for enteral nutrition support, respectively. Nutritional status, complications, decannulation of tracheostomy tubes and level of consciousness on day 1 and day 28 were recorded and compared.
Pragmatics of language refers to the set of abilities that allow one to use and interpret language according to context and, in general, to communicate effectively. Disorders in the pragmatics of language are prevalent in various clinical populations. They are a cause of social withdrawal and worse quality of life, both for patients directly affected and for their family members. Despite this, this type of disorder is rarely considered in neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. This study's objective is to characterize pragmatic deficits in various neurological populations, allowing for the most accurate diagnosis possible and leading to the planning of personalized and effective Rehabilitation Plans.
The purpose of this research is to understand and treat Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) associated photophobia (light sensitivity) and its impact on visual function.
A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation study.
Patients with acute severe brain injury are usually admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. A substantial proportion of these patients will have disorders of consciousness (DOC) after interruption of sedation. It is difficult to reliably predict neurological outcome in these patients. Dependent on the extent of permanently damaged brain areas, DOC in patients with acute severe brain injury may improve or persist, eventually evolving into a minimal conscious state (MCS) or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). These conditions are accompanied by long term severe disability. In current practice, the decision to withdraw life-sustaining support is made by interpreting the results of repeated bedside neurological examination and conventional CT-brain imaging. Reliable identification of patients with a possible good outcome, in whom treatment should not be withdrawn, is difficult. In this prospective observational cohort study we aim to identify patients with a good neurological outcome.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the safety of the drug Angiotensin (1-7) and learn whether it works well as a treatment in people who have suffered a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The main questions this trial aims to answer are: - Is Angiotensin (1-7) safe? - Does Angiotensin (1-7) improve mental functioning and reduce physical signs of brain damage in people who have suffered a moderate to severe TBI? Participants will: - Complete 21 days of study treatment consisting of a once-daily injection. - Provide blood samples. - Undergo two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain. - Complete specific tasks and questionnaires that allow researchers to evaluate the participant's brain and psychological functioning. Researchers will compare three groups: two groups that receive different doses of Angiotensin (1-7) and one group that receives a look-alike treatment with no active drug. This will allow researchers to see if the drug has any negative effects and whether it improves mental functioning and physical signs of brain damage after a TBI.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using a portable neuroimaging device called functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to successfully analyze fNIRS data in individuals with chronic TBI during treadmill training augmented with VR.
This study aims to compare symptom provocation, physiologic response, and rate of perceived (RPE) between the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) and a Modified Dynamic Exertion (mEXiT) test after sport related concussion in adolescents aged 14-17. Participants will be enrolled at their initial concussion clinical visit within 14 days of their injury, and randomly assigned to either the BCTT or mEXiT group. Participants will complete a single visit.
Clinical study participation has historically been heavily biased toward specific demographics. Several people will be invited to enroll in this study so that it may collect a variety of data about traumatic brain injury clinical trial experiences and identify barriers to participation as well as the causes of participants' failure or withdrawal. People with traumatic brain injury who are invited to take part in medical research will benefit from the analysis of the data.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of global disease and directly affects over 1.5 million Canadians, with 165 000 TBIs occurring yearly in Canada. Despite the burden of TBIs, there are limited treatment options available and current treatments generally focus on supportive care. The aim of TBI treatment is reduce inflammation and damage occurring after the TBI (secondary injury). Beta- blockers (BBs) are medications commonly used to block the actions of endogenous catecholamines- hormones that are thought to contribute to secondary injury within brain tissue. This reduces metabolic demand in the vulnerable, injured brain. BBs have been studied in several retrospective trials and one single-center, non- blinded randomized controlled study. These results point towards a benefit to the use of BBs in TBI but need to be confirmed in a rigorous manner before they are widely adopted. The current study aims to assess the feasibility of a single centre randomized controlled trial of BBs versus placebo to treat moderate to severe TBI. This feasibility trial will inform the planning of a large multi-center study powered to detect a difference in cognitive outcomes and mortality. It also will allow the investigators to gather biologic samples for measuring serum catecholamines and inflammatory mediators to better understand the basic science mechanisms of BBs in this patient population; and to assess the feasibility of using the Cambridge Battery to assess cognitive outcomes of trial participants.