View clinical trials related to Brain Herniation.
Filter by:Background and study aims: Computerised Tomography (CT) head scans are frequently requested by Emergency Department (ED) clinicians as one of the investigations for their patients. This often causes a delay when waiting for specialist radiologists to report the findings of the scan. The purpose of this study is to see if online training can improve the ability of ED clinicians to interpret the scans themselves, to a level sufficient to make clinical decisions based on their findings and to explore what aspects of this process they find most challenging. Participants: Emergency Department clinicians who are working in the Emergency Departments of participating sites between April to September 2022 (inclusive), who request CT Head scans as part of their routine clinical practice. What does the study involve?: 180 ED clinicians will be recruited across 6 hospital sites in the United Kingdom. All will undertake a baseline online assessment to measure their accuracy in interpreting CT head scans. One group will then undertake an online training module, with a subsequent assessment immediately afterwards, then over the following 3 months will record interpretations for 30 CT head scans. Head images encountered in participants' routine clinical practice, and their findings, will be compared with the radiology reports for each scan. Participants will then undertake further online assessments 3 and 6 months after the start of the study. Their overall results will be compared with a control group, who will undergo the same process, but undertake the online training after they have tried to interpret 30 scans in their clinical practice. Participants will continue to base their clinical decisions on radiologist reports, not their own interpretations, so patient care will not be affected by this study.
Although craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the acute epidural hematoma, there are insufficient data to support specific surgical treatment method. We aim to perform a multi-center, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral herniation undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.
This will be a multicenter prospective randomized study of adult patients with an acquired skull defect as a result of craniectomy and considered suitable for cranioplasty, i.e. reconstruction of the skull defect, at all seven Hong Kong Hospital Authority neurosurgical units. Patients that underwent their primary craniectomy operation at any of the Hospital Authority neurosurgery centers from the 1st March 2019 and considered suitable for cranioplasty will be included in this study. Those who underwent their primary craniectomy before 1st March 2019 or at an institution other than the aforementioned neurosurgical units will be excluded. Data from clinical records, operation notes, medication-dispensing records, laboratory records and radiological reports will be collected. 30 adult patients with craniectomy will be recruited and randomized into two groups: "early" cranioplasty, i.e. performed within 3 months of craniectomy, and "late", i.e. cranioplasty performed more than 3 months after the operation. The aim of the study is to determine whether early cranioplasty can improve on patient's cognitive performance compared to those who undergo the procedure after 3 months.