View clinical trials related to Bowel Preparation.
Filter by:background:The use of enhanced instruction can improve the efficiency of education for bowel preparation regimens. Researchers hypothesized that face-to-face instruction and personalized intervention for inpatient could improve successful bowel preparation rate and patient's compliance with regimens. Methods:This was an endoscopist-blind,randomized controlled trial. 320inpatients were randomized 1:1 in one of the two study groups. The intervention group received face-to-face instruction and personalized intervention for bowel preparation protocol, while control group received the standard bowel preparation protocol. Patients'demographics, bowel preparation quality, colonoscopy completion and attendance were recorded. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of bowel preparation failure.
Electronic colonoscopy plays an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of intestinal diseases in children.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of administration routine bowel cleansing medication (Bowklean) for the Bowel Preparation at Different Times Prior Colonoscopy in the morning or in the afternoon.
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of abbreviated bowel preparation on repeated colonoscopy in patients with PPB.
The rate of adequate bowel preparation is one of important quality indicators of colonoscopy. Inadequate bowel preparation negatively affects the outcomes of colonoscopy. If patients with inadequate bowel preparation were identified before the procedure, enhanced strategy could be offered to achieve better bowel cleaning. Currently, there were three predicting models of inadequate bowel preparation established based on patient-related factors. So far, none of predictive models have been tested in other than their validation cohort populations, and no study has attempted to apply a different regimen to patients presenting with risk factors for inadequate colon cleanliness. In previous studies, we established a prediction model based on procedure-related factors, which has better accuracy and can better predict the quality of bowel preparation. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of bowel preparation by using a predictive model based on procedure-related factors versus the criterion group in unsedation patients
Bowel preparation is closely lined to the quality of colonoscopy, inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) could lead to higher miss rate of adenomas, patients' discomfort and higher health expense. For the patients with possible IBP before the examination, it may be better to cancel the colonoscopy and repeat bowel preparation through modified or enhanced strategies. This study aimed to externally validate the efficiency of a procedure-based model in predicting inadequate bowel preparation
Background and aims: Inpatients are at high risk for inadequate colon cleansing. Experts recommend 4L-polyethylene-glycol (PEG) solution because of its effectiveness and safety profile. A higher colon cleansing adequacy rate for a hyperosmolar 1L-PEG plus ascorbate prep has been recently reported in an observational study among more than 1,000 inpatients. Thus, the present study is aimed at determining whether 1L-PEG outperforms 4L-PEG among inpatients, through a propensity score-matching between the two groups in order to correct for confounders.
In order to analyze the effectiveness and patient tolerance of the two bowel preparation regimens, we will compare Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Powder (PEG-4000) and Mizone with PEG-ELS. The aim was to demonstrate that polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG-4000) and Mizone is not inferior in overall quality of intestinal preparation to PEG-ELS in subjects undergoing colonoscopy.
The rate of adequate bowel preparation is one of important quality indicators of colonoscopy. Inadeqaute bowel preparation negatively affects the outcomes of colonoscopy. If patients with inadequate bowel preparation were identified before the procedure, enhanced strategy could be offerred to achieve better bowel cleasing. Currently, there were three predicting models of inadequate bowel preparation eatablished based on patient-related factors. It remains unclear which model perfroms better in predicting bowel preparation quality. Futhermore, althought those predicting models only composing of patients-related factors are useful for identifing high-risk patients, the preparation-related factors may also be valuable for prediciting inadeqaute bowel preparation before the procedure of colonoscopy. This study aimed: 1) to compare the values of three availlable models (based on patient-related factors) in predicting inadeqaute bowel preparation in a prospective, multicentered cohort of patients undergoing colonoscopy; 2) to investigate whether a new model based on preparation-related or a combined model based on patient-related and preparation-related factors is comparable to previous models based on patient-related factors.
The objective is to demonstrate that investigational drug, Quiklean®, is not inferior to standard comparator, Klean-Prep with Dulcolax®, with respect to the overall quality of bowel preparation in subjects undergoing colonoscopy.