View clinical trials related to Bowel Preparation Solutions.
Filter by:4L split dose PEG is the gold standard for bowel preparation, however it comes with poor tolerability and poor compliance. Combination of PEG with different agent is useful in reducing total volume, improving compliance and tolerance of patient. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that combination bowel preparation, PEG plus SPMC solution, has similar efficacy and safety profile whereas with a better tolerance when compared to large volume PEG.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the clinic. Colonoscopy is an important means of screening, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal diseases. The accuracy of diagnosis and the safety of treatment are closely related to the quality of intestinal preparation. Inadequate bowel preparation leads to poor effect of colonoscopy, which will reduce the effectiveness and safety of colonoscopy, increase the difficulty and time of colonoscopy, and increase the need of repeated colonoscopy. There are many factors that lead to poor bowel preparation. Recently, a number of studies at home and abroad have evaluated the risk factors related to insufficient bowel preparation. Obesity, men, older age, previous colon surgery history, accompanied by other diseases (such as diabetes, Parkinson's disease), taking antidepressants and other factors can affect the effect of bowel preparation. Although the research of intestinal preparation intervention and education methods has made a lot of progress, but in a series of reports, there are still a considerable number of patients in colonoscopy problems of intestinal preparation. At present, there are few researches on individualized intervention aiming at the risk factors of inadequate bowel preparation in China, so it is urgent to explore individualized bowel preparation scheme suitable for different populations. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment is to study individualized dryness aiming at the risk factors of insufficient bowel preparation in patients with the risk factors of insufficient bowel preparation The effect of pre-treatment on the quality of intestinal preparation can provide reference for improving the quality of intestinal preparation in patients with inadequate intestinal preparation.
About 50-70% only of inpatients who undergo colonoscopy have an adequate bowel cleansing, which is far below the recommended threshold of 90%. Variables associated to inadequate colon preparation have not been assessed yet. Identifying such variables would allow to augment the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy, and also to reduce costs related to the need to repeat colonoscopy. Aim of the present study is to find variables independently associated to an inadequate bowel cleansing and to subsequently build and validate a predictive model, which could prove useful in clinical practice to identify hard-to-prepare inpatients. Secondary endpoints are (i) to assess the proportion of patients with inadequate colon cleansing, (ii) to run a cost-effectiveness analysis between patients with adequate cleansing and patients who need to repeat colonoscopy. Patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy, and patients who take the preparation at home will be excluded.
Background 2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEGA) is known to be as effective as standard 4L polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation. However, the volume of this regimen is still large. Therefore, the present investigators evaluated the potential of 1L PEGA with prepackaged low-residue diet (PLD) for an alternative to 2L PEGA. Aim: To evaluate efficacy of 1L PEG with ascorbic acid combined with prepackaged low-residue diet as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Methods: The subjects were randomly assigned to either groups. PEGA group received 2L PEGA split regimen. PLD group received PLD on the day preceding colonoscopy and 1L PEGA on the morning of colonoscopy. One blinded physician performed colonoscopy and evaluated the degree of bowel preparation using Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS). A questionnaire regarding tolerability and safety were also gathered.
This is a prospective randomized study which will be done at main campus Cleveland Clinic. The investigators will be comparing the colon cleansing by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale in participants undergoing colonoscopy as an inpatient at our hospital. Participants will be randomized to the the standard of care (4 Liter polyethylene glycol based preparation) or a low volume bowel preparation (sodium picosulfate, a stimulant laxative, magnesium oxide and anhydrous citric acid (SP/MC)). Both agents will either be administered as full dose the evening before or as split-dose on the evening before and on the day of the procedure.
Colonoscopic examinations are performed routinely in hospitalized patients for a variety of indications. However, numerous limitations exist in hospitalized patients preventing an endoscopist from performing high quality examinations; possibly necessitating repeated procedures leading to increased cost and re-exposure to their inherent risks. One such prominent challenge lays in the adequacy of bowel cleansing. Inpatient status has been shown to be a predictor of poor bowel preparation as these patients are older, less mobile and have more co morbidities than the outpatient population. Currently, no standardized (or optimized) bowel preparation type or regimen for administration exists for the hospital inpatient population undergoing colonoscopy. Studies in the outpatient population have demonstrated that timing and choice of cathartic medication effects the cleanliness of the bowel preparation but there is no such clinical evidence for in-patients who receive whatever cathartic agent is on hospital formulary. The purpose of the study is compare efficacy, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects associated with low volume cathartic (Pico-Salax) to the current standard volume 4 liter (PEG-Lyte) and the effect of alternate timing of dosages.