Bone Augmentation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone grafting following tooth extraction is commonly performed to preserve bony ridge dimensions adequate to support subsequent implant placement. Alveolar ridge resorption commonly occurs following tooth extraction, and the decrease in bone volume has the potential to make dental implant therapy impossible without surgery to reconstruct the ridge. The aim of ridge preservation grafting is to prevent or minimize this resorptive process, thereby preserving an adequate volume of bone for implant placement. Ridge preservation generally involves placement of a particulate bone graft material in the tooth socket, followed by use of a membrane or similar substance over the socket entrance to contain the bone graft. Various grafting materials have been recommended for these ridge preservation procedures, including demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). The timing of dental implant placement following ridge preservation procedures is controversial, and few studies have examined the effects of different healing time intervals between ridge preservation and implant placement. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the formation of new bone at a site where tooth extraction has been performed followed by grafting using DFDBA. Two different study groups are included, one having the dental implant placed 8-10 weeks after tooth extraction and ridge grafting, the other having the dental implant placed 18-20 weeks after extraction and grafting.
The purpose of this study is to compare healing following tooth extraction and ridge
preservation with DFDBA at a healing time point 8-10 weeks after treatment compared to a
healing time point 18-20 weeks after treatment. There have been no studies to determine
differences in new bone formation using DFDBA for this purpose at various healing time
points post-grafting. The primary objective is to histologically determine the amount of new
bone formation and residual graft material present at the two healing time points after
grafting with DFDBA. Histologic healing will be compared based on three criteria: % of new
vital bone formation, % of residual graft material, and % of nonmineralized connective
tissue/bone marrow. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference between the %
new bone formation at 8-10 weeks after grafting compared to 18-20 weeks after grafting.
This entire protocol involves procedures that are standard care. There will be two subject
groups in this study. All subjects will require extraction of a non-molar tooth, followed by
replacement of the missing tooth with a dental implant. In order to ensure that the bone
core removed during implant osteotomy preparation is taken totally within the confines of
the former tooth socket, the tooth to be extracted will have a position and angulation that
is the same as the implant that will replace the tooth. Each group will have 22 subjects.
Only one tooth will be evaluated in any given subject.
Both groups will consist of subjects who will have cortical DFDBA grafted into the
extraction socket for ridge preservation following tooth extraction. Group 1 will have a
biopsy core taken at the time of implant placement 8-10 weeks after socket grafting. Group 2
will have a biopsy core taken at the time of implant placement 18-20 weeks after socket
grafting. Allocation of subjects into group 1 or 2 will based on randomization once enrolled
into the study. Subjects will be asked to draw a sealed envelope out of a stack of
envelopes, each containing a single slip of paper coded with #1 or a #2. This will determine
the treatment group.
All of the bone graft materials used in this study will come from the same donor (LifeNet
Health). The materials will be procured and processed in the same manner and will have the
same particle size and percent residual calcium. This greatly decreases potential
variability inherent in bone taken from different donors or processed in different manners.
At the time of subject enrollment, the following standard care procedures will be performed:
Impressions will be made for fabrication of diagnostic casts and radiographs will be taken
of the tooth to be extracted. A clear measurement stent will be made on the cast for
vertical and horizontal ridge dimensions.
Following local anesthesia, the tooth will be extracted, and the number of bony walls in
each socket will be recorded, along with the presence of any bony dehiscences or
fenestrations. After extraction, the measurement stent will be placed and a hole will be
made in the occlusal surface directly over the buccal bony wall and the lingual bony wall.
Holes will be made in the buccal and lingual flanges of the measurement stent at a level
approximately 3mm from the bony crests and ridge calipers will be used to make a horizontal
ridge width measurement. These measurements will be recorded. The socket will be thoroughly
debrided, a 1.0cc bottle of cortical DFDBA will be hydrated with sterile saline and the
DFDBA will be placed in the socket to restore the ridge to appropriate contour. A collagen
barrier (Collatape or Collaplug) will then be placed over the socket orifice and secured
with sutures. Flaps will not be reflected to obtain primary closure. If a large dehiscence
exists following extraction, which would most likely affect the facial socket wall, a
collagen barrier with a longer resorption time, such as the Zimmer collagen socket repair
membrane or BioGide collagen membrane will be used instead of Collatape or Collaplug. As
part of standard care, patients will be prescribed systemic doxycycline 100mg twice a day
for 7 days after surgery (if patient has sensitivity to doxycycline, alternate will be
amoxicillin 500mg three times a day for 7 days). The patient will be seen 7-10 days after
extraction/ridge preservation to assess healing, and again 1 month after the procedure.
The implant will be placed 8-10 weeks after ridge preservation in Group 1 and 18-20 weeks
after ridge preservation in Group 2. At the time of implant placement, the first osteotomy
will be prepared using a hollow trephine drill instead of a solid drill. Use of a hollow
trephine allows retention of the bony core; whereas, use of solid drills results in removal
of the bone in very small particles that cannot be examined histologically. Drilling of the
pilot implant osteotomy has historically been done both ways (trephine drill or solid
drill). The bone core in the trephine will be removed from the trephine, placed in 10%
formalin, and prepared for histologic examination. The study will end immediately after
removal of the trephined bone core.
Following initial preparation of the implant site with the trephine, the osteotomy will be
completed and an implant of the appropriate length and diameter will be placed. The size of
the implant will be such that it will engage not only newly formed bone in the socket
itself, but at least 2-3mm of bone apical to the former socket site. A healing abutment will
then be placed.
All subjects will be examined at 7-10 days and 1 month following implant placement. The
patient will then be referred to their restorative dentist for final restoration.
The histologic cores will be processed for demineralized sections and will be stained. The
following histologic parameters will be measured: percent new bone formation, percent
residual graft material, and percent connective tissue/other.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04367766 -
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05612737 -
Evaluation of a Novel Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Technique in Dentistry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04775940 -
Use of Perforated Barrier Membranes and IPRF Nano- Micro Sticky Bone
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02842619 -
Filling Bone Defects/Voids With Autologous BonoFill-II for Maxillofacial Bone Regeneration
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02998632 -
Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06140277 -
Using Of Chitosan in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05339971 -
Modified Surgical Technique for Lateral Block Augmentation Prior to Implant Installation
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02406924 -
Bone Augmentation Using Particulated Biomaterial and Autogenous Bone, Stabilized by Collagen Membrane and Pins (PaMP)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04462575 -
Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Ridges Using Mandibular Blocks With and Without Coverage Using Collagen Membrane
|
N/A |