View clinical trials related to Bladder Cancer.
Filter by:A Clinical Investigation to Confirm Performance and Safety of the Multi4 System in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Bladder Cancer Lesions
The study will be offered to all consecutive patients undergoing scheduled cystoscopy at the Hospitalisation De Jour (HDJ) Chirurgicale, either as part of a diagnostic approach in the event of suspected bladder tumor (exploration of macroscopic hematuria in particular), or as part of the follow-up of a bladder tumor, according to current recommendations (French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: bladder cancer). Once non-opposition has been obtained, clinical data at the time of inclusion will be collected and pseudonymized. Urine is collected prior to cystoscopy, on voided urine, for a minimum sufficient quantity of 50 ml. The urine sample is then separated into transport jars, one of which is used for standard cytological analysis, the other for VISIOCYT cytology (sent to a laboratory platform). In the event of a tumor or suspicious lesion detected at the cystoscopy, a trans-urethral bladder resection (TURB) will be scheduled. Anatomopathological data from this RTUV will also be collected for comparative analysis to establish the diagnostic performance of the test. The tests performed (apart from the urine sample) are part of the usual care pathway. No additional visits will be specifically requested by the protocol. Data from examinations carried out as part of standard pathology management, or suspected pathology, will be used for this research. At the same time, prospective questionnaires on patients' preferences with regard to the various diagnostic examinations for bladder tumours (discrete choice analysis) will be given to patients and completed at the time of cystoscopy.
This is an integrated Phase 1, single centre, 2-part, open-label, dose-escalation study conducted in healthy volunteers to assess the safety, tolerability, and PK of APL-1501 ER capsules in comparison to APL-1202 IR tablets.
The study seeks to delve into the firsthand experiences of patients diagnosed with bladder cancer who partake in a separate clinical trial featuring a specific medical intervention. The primary emphasis will be on meticulously tracking the rates of trial completion and withdrawal among these individuals. By joining this clinical trial, individuals have the unique opportunity to contribute to the betterment of future bladder cancer patients and play an active role in advancing medical research.
The purpose of this study is to test a randomized, controlled diet and physical activity intervention designed to be simple and address barriers to participation in lifestyle intervention among 16 urinary bladder cancer patients. Aim 1 is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Aim 2 is to measure the feasibility of collecting data on the intervention effects on complication rate, nutritional status, weight loss, and quality of life post-surgery among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy ± neoadjuvant therapy. Secondarily, we will determine the magnitude of association between study group and outcomes to inform power calculations in a future, well-powered trial. Participants will: - attend two dietetic consultations at baseline and post-surgical recovery where nutritional status will be evaluated with patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) - complete baseline questionnaires (TCC, FACT-BI-Cys, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin) - receive weekly BOOST boxes - complete pre-surgery weekly BOOST check ins - complete post-surgery weekly BOOST check ins - complete an ASA food recall pre and post-surgery - complete an exercise familiarization consult - record weekly resistance and aerobic exercise performed at home - complete a 6 month follow-up questionnaire - receive compensation Researchers will compare to a Usual Care group to determine differences that could be attributed to the BOOST Box intervention.
A multicenter, retrospective research was conducted. Patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in 10 large medical centers in China were enrolled, comparing the oncologic outcomes of the patients.
A multicenter, retrospective research was conducted. Patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) from for bladder cancer in 32 institutions in China were enrolled in this study. Baseline condition, perioperative, pathological, and survival outcome were collected. The study was aimed to report the real-world condition of RARC in China, and evaluate its effectiveness.
The goal of this pilot study is explore the parameters that can be obtained in bladder tumours by Field-Cycling Imaging (FCI) in patients with both muscle-invasive and non-muscle invasive tumours. The main question it aims to answer is if FCI can give more diagnostic information than conventional tests. Participants will have one FCI scan and the results will be correlated with the results of CT urogram or CT scan.
Multiple lines of evidence have shown that anesthesia method is associated with long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery due to cancers, including lung, breast, prostate, and bladder cancer, etc. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been validated as prognostic biomarkers of a number of cancers. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of anesthesia methods on the number of CTCs in patients receiving transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). The difference of anesthesia method is achieved by using general anesthesia in one group and spinal anesthesia in the other group.
Study design This study is a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center, global study to determine the efficacy of a single immediate intravesical chemotherapy instillation (SI) in the prophylaxis of intravesical recurrence after diagnostic uretero-renoscopy (URS) of patients 18 years of age or older with the fist diagnosis of UTUC. This study will randomize 394 patients globally Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the interventional arm or to observation. Study period This study will include a screening period, a treatment and disease assessment period, safety follow-up visits and a 5-year survival follow-up period to begin immediately after the treatment. Screening period: The period up to 28 days prior to intervention during which the screening procedures occur. Treatment and disease assessment period: The period starting the day of diagnostic URS (Day 0) during which patients receive their assigned treatment (Day 0 to day 1) and disease assessments are performed. All patients must follow the disease assessment schedule, which includes disease assessments at screening and every 3 months (±1 week) from the date of intervention until 24 months from the date of randomization, and then every 6 months for up to 5 years. The treatment and disease assessment period will end at the time of intravesical recurrence, death, or MINERVA-CTU decision to terminate the trial early. Safety follow-up visits: Every patient in this study will be assessed for the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events from the time of signed informed consent until 90 days after the administration of SI. All patients who receive SI will have safety visits 4, 8, and 12 weeks following administration of SI. Safety assessments include targeted physical examination, complications according to Dindo-Clavien classification and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessments. Survival follow-up period: Patients will be followed up at in-clinic site visits, by telephone contact, or by contact with the patient's current physician for up to 5 years from the date of randomized into this study. Objectives Primary objective Efficacy of a SI in the prophylaxis of intravesical recurrence after diagnostic URS for UTUC Secondary objectives - Time to intravesical recurrence - 5-years intravesical recurrence rates - Incidence of high-grade BCa recurrence - Incidence and gravity of adverse events (AEs) due to the SI - To collect and store blood, urine and tissue samples according to each country's local and ethical procedures for identifying candidate markers that may correlate with likelihood of clinical benefit (optional) - To collect and store DNA according to each country's local and ethical procedures for future exploratory research into somatic mutations and genes/genetic variations that may influence oncologic outcomes, to study treatments and susceptibility to disease (optional) - To assess disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients with UTUC treated with SI compared those undergoing observation - To assess patient-reported treatment tolerability directly using specific PRO-CTCAE symptoms Target study population The study population includes patients 18 years of age or older with a primary diagnosis of UTUC, scheduled for diagnostic URS Duration of treatment Patients randomized to the interventional arm will receive a SI within 24h after diagnostic URS. In case of multiple diagnostic URS during the follow-up (including 2nd look for incomplete ablation, non-diagnostic first URS or UTUC recurrence) patients randomized to the interventional arm will receive a SI after each diagnostic URS for 2 years after the day of first diagnostic URS. Follow-up of subjects post discontinuation of study treatment Patients who have discontinued study treatment due to toxicity, symptomatic deterioration, intravesical recurrence or investigator's decision will be followed up for survival until 5 years from the date of diagnostic URS. Survival All randomized patients, regardless of disease status, will be followed up for survival until 5 years from the date of diagnostic URS. Investigational product, dosage, and mode of administration Patients randomized to the interventional arm will receive a SI. The chemotherapy will be at investigator's discretion and institutional availability. The selected chemotherapy must be approved by the MINERVA-CTU in discussion with the local investigator. Statistical methods This study will randomize 394 patients globally. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to SI or observation. Randomization will be stratified by the following factors: 1. Center 2. EAU UTUC risk stratification