View clinical trials related to Binge-Eating Disorder.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of nutritional intervention in eating disorders. Participants underwent an intervention without a control group over 8 weeks. This study aims to provide the maximization of nutritional rehabilitation and support changes in the construction of food autonomy, through a food and nutritional intervention.
Twenty women, ages 60 or older, will be consented and enrolled in a single-arm, pilot implementation trial of the age-tailored cognitive-behavioral based BE intervention. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, post-intervention, and at two follow-up timepoints; weekly BE frequency will be collected to monitor progress during the intervention period.
Adults and adolescents will be asked to participate in a 10-week intervention to better understand their emotions and improve their relationship with food.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of 2 doses of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) (200 milligrams [mg] and 400 mg total daily dose [TDD]) compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED).
This study evaluates whether virtual-reality-based inhibitory control trainings are more effective than computerized trainings in reducing binge eating symptomatology. These trainings are used to improve people's ability to resist their impulses towards highly palatable foods (such as chips or cookies). These trainings also offer promise as a companion to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, an often used and relatively effective therapeutic methodology.
Binge Eating Disorder (BED) patients tend to report low quality of life (Qol). However, research is limited. Most research on Qol in BED include generic measures, rather than disease specific. Obesity is prevalent in BED, but contradicting evidence exists on the influence of obesity in BED.
The Eva-PED-t project will evaluate implementation of a new therapy for eating disorders, called PED-t (Physical Exercise and Dietary therapy), in a new treatment arena for such illnesses. By this, Eva-PED-t evaluates effectiveness- and efficacy outcomes, with the latter highlighting both the user-, the therapists- and the management perspectives. The research group behind this initiative comprises the founders of the PED-t, and holds extensive expertise on research methodology, eating disorders, health science, and exercise medicine, affiliated high-ranked research-intensive universities. Previous documentation of poor implementation of evidence-based knowledge in public health services reveal poor or no translation of new research findings for improved screening, treatment or medical procedures into real life settings. This may impair public health service outcomes, as less effective or ineffective treatment or procedures are routinely preferred. In a randomized controlled trial, the Eva-PED-t partnership recently found a new therapy for eating disorders (PED-t) to be comparable effective to the currently recommended treatment (NCT02079935). Specific advantages with PED-t, are the use of professionals not currently used in therapy of mental disorders, and the efficiency of arranging therapy in groups, hence effectively dealing with the high request for therapy. The Eva PED-t collaborative is motivated by the knowledge of high prevalence of mental illnesses, for which there is a need to improve treatment access and -efficiency. Adding to this scenario, is the new and more prevalent diagnosis of eating disorders, binge eating disorder, for which specialized health services have no prioritization for treatment. Addressing requirements for improved therapy access demands investigation of new treatments and new ways of delivery. The PED-t responds to this request, still recommendation for a broad implementation necessitate exploration of implementation strategies and experiences.
Both behavioral, psychological, and cognitive differences related to social cognitive function have been related to illness-state in eating disorders, but interventions that directly target these problems are limited. This pilot intervention explores whether a brief art-therapy team-building intervention coupled with psychoeducation about social behavior can change self-concept or clinical symptoms in patients with eating disorders. Participants will complete pre-treatment assessments related to social behaviors and clinical symptoms, attend four two-hour group sessions, and provide two follow-up post-treatment assessments at 1-4 weeks after the treatment and 3-5 months later. Comparisons between the pre-intervention data and the first follow-up will be the primary outcome measures. The primary hypotheses are that participants will show increases in self-esteem and positive self-attributions and decreases in eating disorder symptoms after the intervention. The secondary hypothesis is that other clinical symptoms (depression, anxiety) will be improved after the intervention. Feedback from participants about their experience with the study will assess perceived benefits as well as acquisition of the psychoeducation targets.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a web-based intervention specifically designed for patients with Binge Eating Disorder (BED) in a blinded randomized controlled trial. After a sign-up process, a diagnostic interview, and a baseline assessment, eligible participants will be randomly allocated either to (1) an intervention group including the online web-based intervention for BED or (2) a waitlist control group with delayed access to the intervention (12 weeks). The program comprises six mandatory weekly sessions and six modular specialization areas resulting in a treatment period of 12 weeks. Minimal guidance is provided via a chat function. Assessments will be conducted at pretreatment (study entrance), six weeks after baseline (mid-treatment), and 12 weeks after baseline (post-treatment). The investigators expect that the intervention group will show lower frequencies of binge eating episodes as the primary outcome variable after the 12 weeks of treatment compared to a waitlist control condition. Moreover, the investigators assume that there will be a higher reduction in global eating disorder symptoms, comorbid psychopathology, and a higher increase in well-being and self-esteem over 12 weeks in the intervention group compared to the waitlist control group. Finally, the investigators expect that the intervention group will demonstrate a significantly higher reduction in functional impairment, substantially better restoration of work capacity, and an improved ability to regulate emotions after the 12 weeks of treatment.
This study will check how and to whom Vyvanse is prescribed in Australia by retrospectively analyzing a prescription database with additional information provided by a physician survey.