View clinical trials related to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease.
Filter by:The aim of this prospective registry is to evaluate the clinical impact of the new Navitor prosthesis (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in BAV and evaluate both the main sizing methods (the classical annular or the supra-annular with ICD measurement at 4 mm above the virtual basal ring).
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is being offered to younger patients affected by severe aortic stenosis as an alternative to surgery. Although historically excluded from the main randomized clinical trials, patients with native bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are commonly treated in daily TAVI practice. Indeed, several observational studies reported similar outcomes of TAVI in BAV patients compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. Notably, BAV is frequently associated with aortic dilatation (20% to 84% of BAV patients). Surgical patients usually undergo concomitant aortic root replacement if aortic diameter exceed 50 mm (5). TAVI patients do not undergo treatment of the concomitant aortopathy, but currently there is a paucity of data regarding the progression of the aortopathy after AS treatment (6,7). The main aim of this ambispective, multicenter study is to evaluate the progression of the bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy in patients undergoing TAVI by computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment at follow-up.
The goal of the NEO2 BAV registry is to investigate the safety, effectiveness, and clinical performance of TAVI using the ACURATE neo2 valve in patients with severe BAV stenosis. The clinical, procedural, and imaging characteristics will be collected from patients with severe BAV stenosis, regardless of the phenotype, and treated with TAVI using the ACURATE neo2 bioprosthesis worldwide.
This study is to elucidate the impact of germline mutations and clonal hematopoiesis (CHIP) on the progression of early aortic valve calcification in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The study will be conducted over a recruitment period of one year and a follow-up observation period of two years. Considering a 2-year event rate and a 33% occurrence rate of clonal hematopoiesis, each group requires a minimum of 102 participants. Accounting for a 15% dropout rate, a total of 120 participants are needed for each group (type I error (α) = 5%, type II error (β) = 20%). Therefore, the total study population, including patients with normal aortic valve function, is set at 240 participants.
The goal of this non-interventional, retrospective data analysis is to validate the circle method for patients with bicuspid aortic heart valves undergoing transcatheter aortic heart valve implantation (TAVI). The main aims are: - to assess whether patients with bicuspid aortic valves that received a TAVI suffered from fewer complications - if valve size was identical to the one determined using the circle method compared to - a case where circle method derived valve size is different from the actually implanted valve - to develop recommendations on how to size the valve using the circle method.
Aortic valve bicuspid disease is the most common congenital heart disease. It affects 0.5-2% of the population and is associated with an increased risk of developing aortic or ascending aortic valve complications. There is no agreement regarding the opportunity for a "prophylactic" simultaneous aortic valve replacement in the case of mild or moderate aortic valve disease in the bicuspid valve, in patients with an indication for replacement of the ascending aorta due to an aneurysm involving its supra-coronary tract. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term evolution of mild and moderate aortic valve disease in untreated bicuspid valve during supracoronary ascending aortic replacement surgery at our institution.
Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart disease with an incidence ranging from 0.16% in Asians to 2% in Westerners. Asian populations with BAV have different morphological characteristics from those of the Western populations, and further elucidation of these differences will serve as a guide for the treatment and follow-up of Asian patients. Therefore, we conducted this multicentre retrospective study to analysis the clinical features, long-term development and surgical prognosis of BAV .
The goal of this observational study is to assess the changes of ascending aortic diameter in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. whether the ascending aortic diameter increases or remains stable after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, especially in patients with preoperative ascending aortic dilatation; 2. the determinants of postoperative ascending aortic dilatation.
Aortic stiffness is an important imaging biomarker of vascular aging. The ascending aorta is the most elastic segment, and it is excluded by reference non-invasive method carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). We propose to use laser-doppler vibrometry (LDV) to record superficial vibrations generated by cardiac activity and arterial pulses for measuring heart carotid PWV, a surrogate for ascending aorta. The trial aims to demonstrate the equivalence between heart-carotid PWV made by laser-doppler vibrometry (LDV) with the reference MRI measurement (4D-FLOW MRI). As secondary objectives, A) we aim to assess the reproducibility of LDV, compared with MRI, B) show that aortic stiffness measured by LDV fulfils international recommendations, C) to study the association between PWV and age or other cardiovascular risk factors, D) assess the acceptability of the measurement. For this, we include 100 consecutive patients, 50 women, 50 men, scheduled for clinically indicated thoracic aorta MRI.
The goal of this prospective, non-randomized, single-center, observational study is to assess whether there is a progressive dilation of ascending aorta after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients who underwent elective aortic valve replacement or TAVR for stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) at our institution from 2015 to June 2022. Participants will undergo both a CT and an echocardiographic assessment at least 90 days after surgery.