View clinical trials related to Benign Prostate Hyperplasia.
Filter by:The study was designed as a prospective, randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. According to power analysis in regards of previous studies in the literature with diclofenac sodium, using a total of 144 patients are needed for Power: 80% and Efficacy: 0.05. diclofenac (20 mg) and placebo drugs to be used in the study will be numbered 1 and 2 individually. Patient randomization was performed using random.org in 144 patients. On the day of cystoscopy, the patient randomized according to inclusion criteria will be given a medication package corresponding to the number given in randomization. It will not be known by the staff and cystoscopy will be performed by the physician who does not know which package is an effective drug. Parameters: 1. Visual Pain Score during cystoscopy 2. Cystoscopy comfort - a questionnaire to be filled by the doctor 1. Excellent 2. Very good 3. Good 4. Bad 5. Too bad 3. Cystoscopy: Is it efficient? Not efficient? - Will be answered by the doctor. Post-Op: 1. 1st hour Visual Analog Pain Scale inquiry, dysuria, frequency 2. 24th Hour dysuria, Frequency, A total of 144 patients, we plan to arrive at the end of 1 month.
Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin/Solifenacin Combination therapy in Patients with voiding symptoms and moderate to severe storage symptoms due to Benign Prostate Hyperplasia : a randomized, double blinded, parallel design, active controlled, multi-center, phase 3 clinical trial
The primary objective of the post-marketing study is to collect safety and effectiveness data for 5 years on subjects treated with Prolieve®. The collection of 5-year safety information will be used to evaluate the occurrence of any long-term side effects from the treatment. The collection of long-term effectiveness data on subjects treated with Prolieve® will provide information on the long-term effects of treatment and time to re- treatment (any treatment initiated for BPH since Prolieve'" treatment, including a second treatment with Prolieve").
The primary objective is to assess whether prostatic artery embolization has a similar efficacy and safety profile as GreenLight PVP in treating patients with urinary retention secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Subjects who consent will be randomized to either the Prostate embolization (PAE) arm or to the GreenLight PVP arm. The primary endpoint of efficacy of the procedure is measured by the ability of the patient to void. The secondary endpoints recorded will include patients' satisfaction measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) will be measured at 3, 6, and 12 months post treatment. Also, reduction in prostate volume is considered by MRI preoperatively, 3 months and 12 months.