Benign Gynecologic Neoplasm Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures Between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents
NCT number | NCT05710601 |
Other study ID # | 712-15-11-19 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date | January 1, 2023 |
Verified date | January 2023 |
Source | University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The kind of equipment used during laparoscopic surgery may have an effect on how quickly resident surgeons improve their skills. The effects of these technologies on various general and specialized procedures have been the subject of numerous research, all of which have produced comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Although a minimally invasive laparoscopy represents the gold standard method in over 70% of procedures for uterine and adnexal benign diseases, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the potential advantages or disadvantages of such kinds of devices in gynecologic laparoscopy. Based on this, the purpose of this study was to determine whether using a hemostatic surgical device affects how quickly gynecology residents learn to execute simple laparoscopic procedures and how well they perform surgically.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | January 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Senior gynecological surgeons - At least 4 years of residency in gynecology Exclusion Criteria: - Junior residents, fellows, consultants - Operative procedures due to malignancy - Women who were not suitable for or denied a laparoscopic approach - Declined the procedure - Did not sign a written informed consent form - Suffering from a gynecologic malignant disease or severe systemic illnesses - Laparotomic conversion |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli | Napoli |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" |
Italy,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Vision of the surgical field | Numeric Rate Scale (NRS) 0-10 considering 0 for "inadequate vision" and 10 for "optimal vision" | 7 days | |
Primary | Interpretation of the difficulty of the intervention | NRS 0-10 (considering 0 for "extremely easy" and 10 for "extremely difficult") | 7 days | |
Secondary | Overall procedural satisfaction | NRS 0-10 (considering 0 for "complicated or incomplete procedure" and 10 for "uncomplicated and satisfying intervention") | 7 days | |
Secondary | Procedure time | Procedure |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03645304 -
Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Wound Infusion After Laparoscopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03009604 -
Does Simethicone Improve Operative Field in Gynecological Operations
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05629611 -
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Vi-sealer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03548831 -
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
|