Basilar Artery Occlusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Recanalisation of Acute Stroke Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion: The Posterior Circulation ASTER Randomized Trial
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) present a devastating, life-threatening prognosis. Urgent recanalization with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is routinely performed in patients with BAO although the level of evidence is lower than that in anterior circulation occlusions (randomization in this population versus medical treatment alone having been impossible in recent studies). Recently, a large retrospective study supports the interest of thrombectomy in this population . Speed and grade of the recanalisation have a major impact on clinical outcome. Favorable outcome at 90 days is strongly associated with the successful recanalization status at the end of the endovascular procedure (OR=4.57, 95%CI=1.24-16.87, P=0.023). First pass effect has been shown to be a strong marker of efficacy of endovascular procedure with significant correlation with clinical outcome. Thrombectomy with Stent retrievers dramatically changed the prognosis of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion strokes and currently used in BAO patients (posterior circulation). Contact aspiration (CA) is currently used in anterior large vessel occlusions (COMPASS trial, Lancet 2019), with similar rates of recanalization and favorable outcomes (Boulanger M, 2019), as well as in BAO patients . However, the benefit of CA compared to SR for the treatment of BAO remains under debate with the superiority of first line CA compared to SR or no difference. Available data are based on retrospective studies with no data from RCT. In this context, a randomized controlled trial is needed to assess the benefit of CA versus SR.
n/a
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT01717755 -
Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06101667 -
Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion With Extended Time Window (ANGEL-BAO)
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05615038 -
A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05105633 -
Extending the Time Window for Tenecteplase by Recanalization of Basilar Artery Occlusion in Posterior Circulation Stroke
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04177615 -
Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment in Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke in 115 Hospital
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05827042 -
Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Thrombectomy on Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05701956 -
Intravenous Tenecteplase Plus EVT Versus EVT Alone on 4.5 to 24 Hours After Basilar Artery Occlusion
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT02737189 -
Basilar Artery Occlusion Chinese Endovascular Trial
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05580822 -
Additive Effects of Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Successful Thrombectomy Due to Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT04751708 -
Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05512910 -
Minocycline for Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Treatment Due to Basilar Artery Occlusion (MIST-B)
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05402878 -
OUTCOME AND SAFETY OF RECANALIZATION TREATMENTS IN ISCHEMIC STROKE DUE TO ACUTE BASILAR ARTERY OCCLUSION
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05631847 -
Direct Endovascular Treatment Versus Bridging Treatment In Basilar Artery Occlusive Stroke
|
N/A |