Basic Life Support Clinical Trial
Official title:
Self-learning Versus Instructor-led Learning in Basic Life Support Training - A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study investigates whether there is a difference in the BLS skills in first year medical students directly after training and three months later, when randomly assigned to self-learning versus instructor-led training courses.
This is a randomized controlled trial investigating whether self-learning versus
instructor-led learning results in the same BLS skills in first year medical students
directly after training and three months later.
When participants attend the "Erweiterte Erste Hilfe für Studierende der Humanmedizin" they
will receive a short introduction about the study. The investigators will invite all first
year students to participate in the study. As the study is voluntarily, participants need to
sign a written informed consent. After that, the investigators will randomize the students to
either group A or Group B. Group A will train their technical CPR-skills with supervision by
a tutor (either general practitioner or medical student, all trained in CPR teaching) and
group B will train without supervision. The participants in group B will not be allowed to
communicate with each other during the training and they will be prevented from watching each
other. The training will take about 30 minutes for each group. Directly after the training
each group will be tested and the printed report form from the Laerdal Skill Reporter will be
obtained for each participant. In the test the students will perform CPR in a simulated
scenario as a first responder. The scenario is: "A male person has collapsed at the railway
station." The participant should start CPR as learned in the training. During the CPR a
departmental research fellow will observe the study participants and record BLS/AED actions
on a scoring sheet.
The investigators will record three cycles of two minutes CPR (with five times 30:2
compression : ventilation intervals, as recommended by the current international
resuscitation guidelines). During the three cycles an AED will be delivered and the study
participant has to apply the AED and deliver a shock - after three cycles the study
terminates.
After the BLS/AED competence testing, both groups will continue the rest of their first aid
course together and the first part of the study ends. Three months later, the investigators
will repeat the same scenario over the same time interval and record the same parameters. At
the end of the second testing, a short feedback will be provided on the BLS/AED competence
and further practice will be provided to the students to improve their CPR competence. From
this point forward no further data will be collected.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05522166 -
Digital and Face-to-face Basic Life Support Training for Teacher Candidates
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03893253 -
Early or Late Booster in Basic Life Support for Health Care Professionals
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02998723 -
Early or Late Booster for Basic Life Support?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02059395 -
Mastery Learning Versus Time-based Education: Skill Acquisition and Retention of Basic Life Support in Laypeople
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03618888 -
Pedagogical Aspects on Training in Basic Life Support
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06213961 -
The Effect of Pecha Kucha Presentation for Basic Life Support Training on Students' Knowledge and Practices Levels
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06016153 -
The Efficacy of Basic Life Support Education Among Teenagers
|
N/A |