View clinical trials related to Back Pain With Radiation.
Filter by:This study is a First in Human, prospective, multi-center clinical study intended to collect safety and performance information for the Spinal Stabilization Technologies PerQdisc® Nucleus Replacement System and procedure concurrently following a successful discectomy using a minimally invasive posterolateral (MIPL) approach. Patients that are at least 21 years or older, presenting with symptomatic radiculopathy from a focal lumbar disc herniation that requires surgical decompression will be included in this study.
This will be a placebo controlled, randomized, double-blind, comparative effectiveness study, in which we patients are enrolled during an emergency department (ED) visit for acute radicular low back pain (LBP) and followed by telephone two and seven days later. Patients will be randomized to receive an oral dose of dexamethasone for 2 consecutive days or placebo during an ED visit for acute radicular LBP. Every patient will receive a 7 day supply of ibuprofen and a low back pain education session.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely applied therapy to treat chronic neuropathic pain, and one of the most common indications is persisting radicular neuropathic pain following lumbar spine surgery. In traditional SCS therapies, the objective has been to replace the pain sensation with paresthesia. The anticipation is that the electrical current alters pain processing by masking the sensation of pain with a comfortable tingling or paresthesia. Although patients mostly cope with paresthesia, a significant proportion reports that the sensation is unpleasant. 'Burst' SCS utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli. This SCS technique seems to provide paresthesia-free stimulation, resulting in better pain relief of low back and leg pain then traditional tonic stimulation. The widespread use of SCS has not been backed by solid evidence. The absence of placebo-controlled trials has long been an important point of criticism, but due to the nature of the intervention with sensation of paresthesia, studies with placebo control have so far not been considered possible. When 'burst' SCS is used the stimulation is often unnoticed by the patient, allowing comparison with placebo stimulation. The aim of this randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 'burst' spinal cord stimulation for chronic radicular pain following spine surgery.
Study Design: Prospective, single-blinded, multi-center, randomized, controlled, pivotal study Study Objective: To evaluate if P-15L is not inferior in effectiveness and safety to local autologous bone (and allograft as extender where necessary) when applied in instrumented TLIF in subjects with Degenerative disc disease (DDD) Study Endpoints: Primary endpoint: Month 24 Composite Clinical Success (CCS): - Achievement of fusion (Evidence of continuous trabecular bridging bone in the intervertebral space) - At least 15-point improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - No new or worsening, persistent neurological deficit - No subsequent surgical intervention at the index level Once fusion is radiographically confirmed, it will be assumed that fusion has occurred at all subsequent time points without the need to reconfirm fusion status at later time points. Multiplicity Controlled Secondary endpoint: • Visit at which fusion is confirmed. Other Secondary endpoints: - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, changes over time, and achievement of a 20 mm improvement (Back, left leg, right leg); - Physical Function and Mental Health Composite Scores (Short Form Health Survey SF-12 and changes over time).